The problem of migrants from Africa in the politics of Poland and Hungary

The EU treaty law distinguishes competences between the EU and its Member States. The scope of EU competence is constantly growing. The governments of the Member States wanted to ensure their decisions in matters of security. However, this area of international affairs is beginning to be dominated by EU institutions. It causes problems and conflicts of competence. An example is the issue of the allocation of immigrants between EU Member States and various concepts of the new EU external border security system. The division of these competencies should therefore be determined precisely. The lack of these regulations weakens the EU’s integrity and threatens to break it down. This hypothesis is confirmed by Brexit and the current political and social situation in several EU countries. e.g. in Poland and Hungary. The purpose of the article is to indicate the current legal status and postulates de lege ferenda of acquis communautaire.

REFERENCES:

• Bradlay K., Legislating in the European Union, [in:] Barnard C. (ed.), European Union Law, Oxford University Press, 2014.
• Colino C., Molina I., National Governments and the European Union, [in:] Hoek van der M.P. (eds.), Handbook of Public Administration and Policy in the European Union, Boca Raton: Routledge, 2005.
• Csicsmann L., The Syrian refugee crisis reconsidered: The role of the EU-Turkey Agreement, „Corvinus Journal of International Affairs” 2016, no 1.
• Czapliński, W., European Union Law and Laws of the Members Statep. Sources of EU Law, Warsaw: University of Warsaw, 2013.
• Czaputowicz J., Suwerenność, Warszawa: PISM, 2015.
• Gálik Z., Molnár A., Regional and Bilateral Relations of the European Union, Budapest: Dialog Campus, 2019.
• Hagemann P., Høland B., Bicameral Politics in the European Union, „Journal of Common Market Studies” 2010, no. 48.
• Hussain K. (ed.), The European Commission in the Twenty-First Century, Oxford: University Press, 2013.
• Lasok P., General Principles of EU Law, [in:] Vaughan D., Robertson A., Yevgenyeva A. (eds.), Law of the European Union, Oxford: University Press, 2013.
• MacCormick N., Sovereignty and after, in: Kalmo H. & Skinne Q. (eds.), Sovereignty in Fragmentp. The Past, Present and Future of a Contested Concept, Oxford: University Press, 2014.
• Manzella A., The Role of Parliaments in the Democratic Life of the Union, in: Micossi P., Tosato G.L. (eds.), The European Union in the 21st Century, Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies, 2009.
• Marks G., Nielsen F., Ray L., Salk J., Competencies, Cracks and Conflicts, Regional Mobilization in the European Union, [in:] Marks G., Scharp, F.W. Scmitter P.C. (eds.), Governance in the European Union, London, 2006.
• Marszałek-Kawa J., Plecka D., Hołub A. (red.), Social Security. Selected Aspects, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, Toruń 2018.
• Nugent N., The Government and Politics of the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010,
• Piattoni P., The Evolution of the Studies of European Union MLG, [in:] Ongaro E, Massey A., Holzer M., Wayenberd E. (eds.), Governance and Intergovernmental Relations in the European Union and the United States: Theoretical Perspectives, Cheltenham: E. Elgar, 2010.
• Pollack M.A., The Engines of European Integration. Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting in the EU, Oxford: University Press, 2005.
• Szmitter P.C., Neo-neofunctionalism, [in:] Wiener A., Diez T. (eds.), European Integration Theory, Oxford: University Press 2013.
• Tomaszewski W., Władza wykonawcza w Polsce z perspektywy funkcjonowania państwa w Unii Europejskiej. Pomiędzy normatywizmem a realizmem, Olsztyn: Wyd. UWM, 2015.
• Vink E., Multi-Level Democracy: Deliberative or Agonistic? The Search for Appropriate Normative Standards, „Journal of European Integration” 2007, no 3.
• Warleigh A., Conceptual Combinations: Multilevel Governance and Policy Networks, in: Cini M., Bourne A.K. (eds.), Palgrave Advances in European Union Studies, Basingstoke, New York: Macmillan, 2005.