Studia regionalne w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych do 1989 roku

Regional studies within the discipline of international relations to 1989

The aim of the article is to analyse the genesis and evolution of regional studies from the interwar period to the end of the Cold War. It is based on the research assumption that regional studies throughout this period developed in close association with the study of international relations, reaching the status of a sub-discipline of international relations. Regional studies are a sub-discipline of studies of international relations because their subject matter is international relations in a given region (regional system), which, according to the adopted systematics of the discipline’s research area, is an intermediate level of analysis between the state and the global system. Therefore, it is natural to ask what premises and assumptions were the basis for the interdependent development of research on regionalism and international relations, which led to the formation of regional studies as a sub-discipline of international relations? Trying to answer this research question, the following hypothesis can be formulated: regional studies as a sub-discipline of international relations was created through the efforts of international relations researchers to find an optimal level of research and theorizing that could combine the perspective of the state and its foreign policy with the perspective of the entire international system. It was also a manifestation of the desire to deepen research understood as the formulation of fully verifiable theories based on more available empirical data at the regional subsystem level.

Регионоведение в науке о международных отношениях

Цель статьи – представить истоки и эволюцию «региональных исследований» от межвоенного периода до конца холодной войны. Статья построена на исследовательском предположении, что регионоведение на протяжении анализируемого периода развивалось в тесной связи с исследованиями международных отношений, достигнув статуса субдисциплины науки о международных отношениях. Регионоведение является субдисциплиной науки о международных отношениях, поскольку занимается международными отношениями в данном регионе (региональной системе), что, согласно принятой систематике области исследования дисциплины, является промежуточным уровнем анализа между государством и глобальной системой. Таким образом, вполне естественным кажется вопрос о том, какие предпосылки и предположения были основой для взаимозависимого развития исследований регионализма и международных отношений, которое привело к формированию регионоведения как субдисциплины науки о международных отношениях? Пытаясь ответить на этот вопрос, можно сформулировать следующую гипотезу: регионоведение как субдисциплина науки о международных отношениях было создано в результате стремлений исследователей международных отношений, направленных на поиск оптимального уровня исследований и теоретизирования, сочетающих точку зрения государства и его внешнюю политику, и перспективу всей международной системы. Это также было проявлением желания углубить исследования, подразумеваемые как формулировка полностью проверяемых теорий, основанных на более доступных эмпирических данных на уровне региональной подсистемы.

REFERENCES:

• Acharya, A. (2012). Comparative Regionalism. A Field Whose Time Has Come? International Spectator, 1, 3–15.
• Acharya, A. (1992). Regional Military-Security Cooperation in the Third World: A Conceptual Analysis of the Relevance and Limitations of ASEAN, Journal of Peace Research, 29, 9.
• Antonowicz, L. (1964). Likwidacja kolonializmu ze stanowiska prawa międzynarodowego. Warszawa: PWN.
• Balassa, B. (1962). Theory of Economic Integration. London: Allen and Unwin.
• Barnes, T.J., Farish, M. (2006). Between Regions: Science, Militarism, and American Geography from World War to Cold War. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 4, 807-826.
• Bierzanek, R. (1977). Bezpieczeństwo regionalne w systemie ONZ. Warszawa: Wyd. MON.
• Bierzanek, R. (1971). Współczesne stosunki międzynarodowe. Warszawa: Wyd. UW.
• Binder, L. (1958). The Middle East as subordinate international system. World Politics, 10, 403–429.
• Brecher, M. (1963). International Relations and Asian Studies: The subordinate state system of Southern Asia. World Politics, 15, 213–235.
• Cantori, L., Spiegel, L. (1969). International Regions: A Comparative Approach to Five Subordinate Systems. International Studies Quarterly, 4, 361–380.
• Cantori, L., Spiegel, L. (1970). The International Politics of Regions: A Comparative Approach. New York: Prentice-Hall.
• Cantori, L., Spiegel, L. (1973). The Analysis of Regional International Politics: The Integration Versus the Empirical Systems Approach. International Organization, 4, 465–494.
• Chmielewski, J. et al. (1956). Antologia literatury chińskiej. Warszawa: PWN.
• Cohen, S.B. (1963). Geography and Politics in a World Divided. New York: Random House.
• Cummings, B. (1997). Boundary Displacement: Area Studies and International Studies during and after the Cold War. Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 1, 6–26.
• Dedeoglu, B., Bilener, T. (2017). Neofunctional Regional Integration Theory Put to Test in Asia: New Regionalism around India and ASEAN. Insight Turkey, 4, 155–174.
• Deutsch, K. et al. (eds.) (1957). Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Duroselle, J. (1952). Area Studies: Problem of Methods. International Social Science Bulletin, 4, 636–647.
• Falk, R.A., Mendlovitz, S.H. (eds.). (1973). Regional Politics and World Order (p. vi). San Francisco: WH Freeman.
• Farish, M. (2005). Archiving Areas. The Etnographic Board and Second World War. Annuals of the American Geographers, 3, 663–679.
• Fawcett, Z.L. (1994). Regionalism in Historical Perspective. W: L. Fawcett, A. Hurrell (eds.). Regionalism in World Politics. Regional Organization and International Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 9–37.
• Gilas, J. (1975). Wstęp do nauki stosunków międzynarodowych. Toruń.
• Haas, E. (1958). The Uniting of Europe. Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950–1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Haas, E. (1975). The obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies.
• Haas, M. (1970). International subsystems: stability and polarity. American Political Science Review, 64(1), 98–123.
• Haas, E. (1976). Turbulent Fields and the Theory of Regional Integration. International Organization, 2, 173–212.
• Haliżak, E. (1982). Kategoria regionalizmu w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Stosunki Międzynarodowe, 1, 49–59.
• Haliżak, E. (1992). Regionalizm morski. Stosunki Międzynarodowe, 16, 58–71.
• Haliżak, E. (2004). Regionalizm w stosunkach międzynarodowych. W: E. Haliżak, R. Kuźniar (red.), Stosunki międzynarodowe. Geneza. Struktura. Dynamika. Warszawa: Wyd. UW, 281–310.
• Haliżak, E. (2019). Udział Polski w pracach Międzynarodowego Instytutu Współpracy Intelektualnej i Konferencji Wyższych Studiów Międzynarodowych w okresie międzywojennym (1923–1939). W: E. Haliżak, T. Łoś-Nowak, A. Potyrała, J. Starzyk- -Sulejewska (red.), Polska w instytucjach międzynarodowych. Warszawa: Narodowe Centrum Kultury, 57-81.
• Hartshorne, R. (1939). Nature of Geography: A Critical Survey of Current Thought in the Light of the Past. Washington.
• Hoffmann, S. (1966). Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation State and the Case of Western Europe. Daedalus, 3-4, 862–916.
• Kaplan, M. (1957). System and Process in International Politics. New York: John Wiley.
• Katzenstein, P. (2001). Area and Regional Studies in the United States. PS: Political Science and Politics, 4.
• Klein, J. (1993). Reflections on Geopolitics: From Pangermanism to the Doctrines of Living Spaces and of Moving Frontiers. W: C.E. Zoppo, Ch. Zorgbibe, On Geopolitics: Classical and Nuclear. Brussels, 60–66.
• Kruczkowski, A. (ed.). (1965). 20 lat polityki zagranicznej Polski Ludowej: materiały sesji naukowej PISM, Warszawa, 15–16 września 1964. Warszawa: Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych.
• Lachs, M. (1955). Zagadnienia prawne walki narodowowyzwoleńczej. Warszawa, PISM.
• Lombarde, Z.P.D., Soderbaum, P., Langehove L., Baert., F. (2010). The Problem of Comparison in Comparative Regionalism. Review of International Studies, 3, 731–753.
• Miu, K. (2019). The SSRC and the founding movement of „area studies” in America 1943–1953. China International Strategy Review, 1, 283–309.
• Modelski, G. (1961), International Relations and Area Studies: The Case of South – East Asia, International Relations, 2, 143–155.
• Morgenthau, H. (1952). Area studies and the study of International Relations. International Social Science Bulletin, 4, 647–654.
• Mrozek, B. (1973). Orientalistyka a nauki polityczne, w świetle problematyki badawczej państw podkontynentu Indyjskiego. Przegląd Orientalistyczny, 2.
• Nye, J. (1970). Comparing Common Markets: A Revised Neo-Functionalist Model. International Organization, 4, 796–835.
• Postel-Vinay, K. (2007). The Historicity of the International Region: Revisiting the ‘Europe and the Rest’ Divide. Geopolitics, 12, 555–569.
• Rafael, V. (1994). The Cultures of Area Studies in the United States. Social Text, 41, 91–111.
• Rafael, V. (1999). Regionalism. Area Studies and the Accident of Agency. The American Historical Review, 4, 1208–1220
• Redzik, S. (2006). Lwowska Szkoła Dyplomatyczna. Zarys historii Studium Dyplomatycznego przy Wydziale Prawa Uniwersytetu Jana Kazimierza we Lwowie (1930–1939), Warszawa: Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych.
• Rodziński, W. (1958). Historia Chin. Warszawa: PWN.
• Równy, K. (1982). Układy regionalne podczas tworzenia światowych organizacji bezpieczeństwa. Stosunki Międzynarodowe, 1, 59–83.
• Russett, B.M. (1967). International regions and the international system. Westport: Greenwood Press.
• Russett, B. (1968). Delineating International Regimes. W: W.D. Singer (red.), Quantitative International Politics: Insights and Evidence. New York, 305–325.
• Schmitter, P. (1969). Three Neofunctionalism Hypotheses about Regional Integration. International Organization, 1, 161–166.
• Schweller, R.L. (1999). Fantasy theory. Review of International Studies, 25(1), 147–150.
• Thompson, W.R. (1973). The regional subsystem: a conceptual explication and a propositional inventory. International Studies Quarterly, 17(1), 89–117.
• Thompson, W.R. (1981). Delineating Regional Subsystems: Visit Networks and the Middle Eastern Case. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 13(2), 213–235.
• Waltz, K. (1959). Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Singer, J.D. (1961). The level-of-analysis problem in international relations. World Politics, 14(1), 77–92.
• Winiarski, B. (1928). Bezpieczeństwo, arbitraż, rozbrojenie. Poznań: Fiszer i Majewski.
• Vayrynen, R. (1984). Regional Conflic Formations: Intractable Prolem of International Relations Theory. Journal of Peace Research, 21, 353–355.
• Zajączkowski, J. (2013). Poziom analizy regionalnej w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych. W: E. Haliżak, M. Pietraś (red.), Poziomy analizy stosunków międzynarodowych, t. 1, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Rambler, 65–88.
• Zartman, I. (1967). Africa as a subordinate state system in International Relations. International Organization, Vol. 21, 545–564.