Conciliatory and Conflictual Ethnopolitical Concepts in the Republics of the Russian Federation: Tatarstan and Chechnya

  • Author: Andrzej Wierzbicki
  • Institution: University of Warsaw
  • ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5493-164X
  • Author: Sylwia Gorlicka
  • Institution: University of Warsaw
  • ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1205-030X
  • Published online: 17 December 2021
  • Final submission: 9 March 2021
  • Printed issue: 2021
  • Source: Show
  • Page no: 17
  • Pages: 131-147
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202157
  • PDF: ppsy/50/ppsy202157.pdf

Russia is a state with a multi-ethnic federal structure inherited from the USSR. Implementing an ethnic policy that would unite and integrate its citizens is one of its most important goals. Among Russia’s federal subjects are also national republics pursuing their own ethno-political concepts, either conciliatory or conflictual. Tatarstan and Chechnya are examples of such republics. With the use of the comparative method, the article is an attempt at demonstrating many factors that have an impact on the shaping and implementing of the ethnic policy through such criteria as the status of the republics, the concept of the nation, and ethnocentrism, historical memory, the role of Islam and its politicization, and the language policy. The article also outlines their consequences and possible future scenarios.

REFERENCES:

  • Avioutskii, V. (2005). Géopolitique du Caucase. Armand Colin.
  • Ben-Dior, G. (1988). Ethnopolitics and the Middle Eastern State. In M. J. Esman, & I. Rabinovich (Eds.), Ethnicity, Pluralism and the State in the Middle East (p. 72). Cornell University Press.
  • Chandra, K. (2012). Introduction. In K. Chandra (Ed.). Constructivist Theories of Ethnic Politics (pp. 12–13). Oxford University Press.
  • Chuev, S. (2004). Prokliatye soldaty. Predateli na storone reicha. Eksmo.
  • Cordell, K., & Wolff, S. (2004). Ethnopolitics in Contemporary Europe. In K. Cordell & S. Wolff (Eds.), The Ethnopolitical Encyclopaedia of Europe (pp. 5–12). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Galperin, Ch. (2003). Vymyshlennoe rodstvo. Moskoviia ne byla naslednitseĭ Zolotoĭ Ordy. Rodina, 12, 68-71.
  • Gdański, J. (2005). Zapomniani żołnierze Hitlera. De Facto.
  • Grochmalski, P. (1999). Rys prawdziwy. Alta 2.
  • Guboglo, M. (1998). Iazyki etnicheskoĭ mobilizatsii. Studia Historica.
  • Hakim, R. (2003). Rus’ tatarskaia. In Tatarskiĭ put’: prava naroda i politkorrektnost’ (p. 35). Izdatel’stvo “Magarif".
  • Hakimov, R. (2005). Dva istoka rossiĭskoĭ gosudarstvennosti. Rodina, 8, 45–47.
  • Karbainov, N. (2018). Ideologema 1552 goda v postsovetskom Tatarstanie: versiia ėlit i massovye predstavleniia. In Power and elites. Vol. 5 (pp. 225–227). Sotsiologicheskiĭ instytut RAN Federal’nogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo sotsiologicheskogo tsentra Rossiĭskoĭ akademii nauk.
  • Konstitutsiia Respubliki Tatarstan (v redaktsii zakonov Respubliki Tatarstan ot 19 aprelia 2002 gоdа № 1380, оt 15 sentiabria 2003 gоdа № 34-ЗRТ, оt 12 mаrtа 2004 godа № 10-ЗRТ, оt 14 mаrtа 2005 gоdа № 55-ЗRТ, оt 30 marta 2010 goda № 10-ЗRТ, оt 22 noiabria 2010 godа № 79-ЗRТ, оt 22 iiunia 2012 godа № 40-ЗRТ). (2020). http://minjust.tatarstan.ru/rus/konstitutsiya.htm?pub_id=1084014.htm
  • Latypov, R. (2009). Mif o tatarskom natsionalizmie. Zhertvy Chingizkhana i Shaĭmieva. https://apn-nn.com/analytic/mif-o-tatarskom-natsionalizme-zhertvy-chingizkhana-i-shaymieva-/
  • Makarova, G. (2018). Tatarstan v videnii ėlit i prostyh zhiteleĭ republiki. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, XXI(2), 75–105.
  • Malashenko A., Koppiters B., & Trenin D. (1997). ‘Ruskiĭ natsionalizm i islam’. In Etnicheskiie i regionalnye konflikty w Evrazii, vol. 2 (pp. 8-10). Ves’ mir.
  • Matsiev I. (2007). Iazykovaia dilemma Chechni. https://iwpr.net/ru/global-voices/%D1%8F%D0%B7%D1%8B%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F-%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%BC%D0%B0-%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%B8
  • Mirsiiapov I. (2004). Natsional'naia ideologiia i natsional'nye vzaimootnosheniia v Respublike Tatarstan. Izdatel’stvo Ves’ Mir.
  • Model’ Tatarstana – iskusstvo vozmozhnogo i nevozmozhnogo. (2000). http://shaimiev.tatarstan.ru/rus/index.htm/ppub/1348062.htm
  • Osobennosti kavkazskogo mentaliteta i “novaia Rossiia”. (2011). http://test.vnatio.org/biblioteka/node84/
  • Rothschild, J. (1981). Ethnopolitics. A Conceptual Framework. Columbia University Press.
  • Sharafutdinova, G. (2000). Chechnya versus Tatarstan. Understanding Ethnopolitics in Post-Communist Russia. Problems of Post-Communism, 47(2), 13–22.
  • Trepavlov, V. (2003). Belyĭ padishakh. Rodina, 12, 72–75.
  • Wierzbicki, A. (2011). Etniczność i polityka. Oficyna Wydawnicza ASPRA-JR.
  • Wolosky, L.S. (2000). Putin's Plutocrat Problem. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2000-03-01/putins-plutocrat-problem
  • Yusupova, G. (2018). Cultural nationalism and everyday resistance in an illiberal nationalising state: ethnic minority nationalism in Russia. Nations and Nationalism, 24(3), 624–647.

federal subject Chechnya Republic ethnopolitics Tatarstan Russia

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart