Published online: 16 July 2021
Final submission: 29 June 2021
Printed issue: December 2021
Author: Jarosław Nocoń
E-mail: jaroslaw.nocon@ug.edu.pl
Institution: Univeristy of Gdańsk (Poland)
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1202-7580
Year of publication: 2021
Source: Show
Page no: 14
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202139
PDF: ppsy/50/ppsy202139.pdf

Applying systems analysis in political science research is still one of the important dimensions of political science methodology. Reconstruction of the functional model of the social system seems to be an attractive proposition for policy researchers. Signed by the name of Jeffrey Charles Alexander, the American version of neofunctionalism is one of the responses to the crisis of traditional forms of structural functionalism. The main purpose of the reconstruction of T. Parsons’s theory was its revitalization consisting in restoring the possibility of its application in contemporary social research. The reinterpretation of the classical approach was to a large extent “forced” by harsh criticism of the current approach and focused especially on attempts to overcome the limitations contained therein, which manifested in the impossibility of correlation of functional theorems with newly developing research currents Jeffrey Alexander restored relevance and emphasizes suitability for interpreting and explaining political processes and phenomena. Understanding the concept of functions and functional relations in the political environment allows for effective application in the analysis of contemporary political systems. Therefore, changing the method of functional analysis is a useful methodological tool in developing a political theory.

REFERENCES:

  • Alexander, J. (1983). The Modern Reconstruction of Classical Thought: Talcott Parsons. University of California Press.
  • Alexander, J.C. (1985). Introduction. In J.C. Alexander (Ed.), Key Issues in Sociological Theory. Sage.
  • Alexander, J., & Colomy, P. (1990). Neofunctionalism Today: Reconstructing of a Theoretical Tradition. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Frontiers of Social Theory: The New Synthesis. Columbia University Press.
  • Alexander, J. (1998). Neofunctionalism and After. Blackwell Publishers.
  • Almond, G.A. (1990). A Discipline Divided. Schools and Sects in Political Science. Routledge.
  • Barber, B. (1993). Constructing the Social System. Transaction Publishers.
  • Biernat, T. (2000). Legitymizacja władzy politycznej. Elementy teorii. Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
  • Blum, W.T. (1971). Theories of Political System: Classics of Political Thought and Modern Political Analysis. Prentice Hall.
  • Collins, R. (1985). Jeffrey Alexander and the Search for Multidimensional Theory. Theory and Society, 14, 877-892.
  • Easton, D. (1993). The Idea of a Political System and the Orientation of Political Research. In J. Farr, & R. Seidelman (Eds.), Discipline and History. Political Science in United States. University of Michigan Press.
  • Eisenstadt, S.N. (1993). The political System of Empires. Transaction Publishers.
  • Etzioni, A. (1968). The Active Society. A Theory of Societal and Political Process. Free Press.
  • Gibson, J.E., & Scherer, W.T. (2007). How to Do System Analysis. John Wiley and Sons Publication.
  • Giddens, A. (1990). Robert K. Merton. On Structural Analysis. In J. Clark, C. Modgil, and S. Modgil (Eds.), Robert K. Merton, Consensus and Controversy. The Falmer Press.
  • Joas, H. (1993). Pragmatism and Social Theory. University of Chicago Press.
  • Layder, D. (2006). Understanding Social Theory. Sage Publications.
  • Legg, K.L. (1974). Patrons, Clients and Politicians. New Perspectives on Political Clientelism. University of California Press.
  • Lidz, V. (2001). Language and the „Family” of Generalized Symbolic Media. In J. Trevino (Ed.), Talcott Parsons Today: His Theory and Legacy in Contemporary Sociology. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Mahler, M., & Bunge, M. (2001). Function and Functionalism: A Synthetic Perspective. Philosophy of Science, 68(1), 75-94.
  • Maj, P., & Paruch, W. (2008). The Concept of “Political System” in Political Science Research in Poland – Aspects and Controversies Related to the Concept’s Definition. Politics and Society, 5.
  • Nocoń, J. (2010). Między tradycją a modernizacją. Przeobrażenia badań politologicznych w świetle neofunkcjonalizmu Jeffreya C. Alexandra. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kazimierza Wielkiego.
  • Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Free Press.
  • Parsons, T. (1969). Politics and Social Structure. Free Press.
  • Parsons, T. (1972). Szkice z teorii socjologicznej. PWN.
  • Turner, J.H. (2001). Can functionalism be saved? In J. Trevino (Ed.), A. Talcott Parsons Today: His Theory and Legacy in Contemporary Sociology. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Woroniecka, G. (2001). Działanie polityczne. Próba socjologii interpretatywnej. Oficyna Naukowa.
  • Wróbel, S. (1990). Przywództwo polityczne i władza polityczna w ujęciu T. Parsonsa. Studia Nauk Politycznych, 1-3.

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart