Clustering of Polish Citizens on the Bases of Their Support for Leaving and Remaining the European Union

The article presents the clustering of Polish citizens based on the empirical dimension of support for European integration. The structure of the work is based on three key elements constituting the basis of the presented text. The first refers to the development of a scale to measure the extent of support for the integration of Poland with the EU. The second element covers an area of support scale modelling. After the substantial and statistical analysis of the adequacy of the probability distribution for the support scale, it was decided that a model in which the scale underwent mixing non-standard Beta distributions would be adopted. Applying the Maximal Likelihood Method (ML), the components for its fitted probability densities and estimators of prior (or mixing) probabilities were indicated. The procedure allowed us to define the clusters of which the population of voters was composed. The paper’s final section presents many practical and theoretical conclusions for political parties and scientists interested in the discussed area. The novelty of applying the ML method goes hand in hand with the findings that previously appeared in political science literature, although under different economic and geopolitical conditions.

REFERENCES:

• Aitkin, M., Francis, B., Hinde, J., & Darnell, R. (2009). Statistical modelling in R. Oxford University Press.
• Arnarsson, A., & Zoega, G. (2016). On the Causes of Brexit. European Journal of Political Economy, 55C, 301–323.
• Barcik, J. (2018). Biała księga w sprawie przyszłości Europy w kontekście Brexitu. Europejski Przegląd Sądowy, 10(157), 4–10.
• Bayer, L. (2021, October 26). As EU seeks talks, Poland risks unravelling the bloc’s legal order. Politico EU. https://www.politico.eu/article/polish-legalwoes
• Beck, T., Underhill, G. (Eds.) (2017). Quo Vadis? Identity, Policy and the Future of the European Union. CEPR Press.
• Ben-Ami, S. (2022). Populism, Past and Present. https://www.projectsyndicate.org/commentary/populismeconomic-grievances-by-shlomo-benami-2016-08
• Betlej, A., & Soler, U. (2022). Network Society versus Societies of Networks: Brexit and the Issue of National Identity in Poland. In A. Betlej, R. Delina, B. Gavurova, K. Grabczuk, E. Huculova, A. Kutlu, M. Redo, L. Senderakova, U. Soler (Eds.), European Dilemmas of the Brexit Era (pp. 18–36). Faculty of Organisation Studies in Novo Mesto.
• Betlej, A., Delina, R., Gavurova, B., Grabczuk, K., Huculova, E., Kutlu, A., Redo, M., Senderakova, L., & Soler, U. (Eds.) (2019). European Dilemmas of the Brexit Era. Faculty of Organisation Studies in Novo Mesto.
• Bevelander, P., & Wodak, R. (Eds.) (2019). Europe at the Crossroads: Confronting Populist, Nationalist and Global Challenges. Nordic Academic Press.
• Biskamp, F. (2019). Six Theories and Six Strategies Concerning Right-Wing Populism. In P. Bevelander, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Europe at the Crossroads: Confronting Populist, Nationalist and Global Challenges (pp. 93–112). Nordic Academic Press.
• Bonikowski, B. (2016). Three Lessons of Contemporary Populism in Europe and the United States. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 23(1), 9–24.
• Boomgaarden, H. G., Schuck, A. R., Elenbaas, M., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Mapping EU attitudes. Conceptual and Empirical Dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU Support. European Union Politics, 12(2), 241–266.
• Brinegar, A. P., Jolly, S. K., & Kitschelt, H. (2004). Varieties of capitalism and political divides over European integration. In G. Marks, & M. R. Steenbergen (Eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict (pp. 62–89). Cambridge University Press.
• Buras, P. (2017). Europe and its discontents: Poland’s collision course with the European Union. European Council on Foreign Relations, 230, 1–14.
• Carey, S. (2002). Undivided Loyalties: Is National Identity an Obstacle to European Integration? European Union Politics, 3(4), 387–413.
• Carothers, T., & O’Donohue, A. (Eds.) (2019). Democracies Divided. The Global Challenge of Political Polarization. Brookings Institution Press.
• Cifarelli, D. M., & Regazzini, E. (1996). De Finetti’s Contribution to Probability and Statistics. Statistical Science, 11(4), 253–282.
• Cislak, A., Pyrczak, M., Mikiewicz, A., & Cichocka, A. (2020). Brexit and Polexit: Collective narcissism is associated with support for leaving the European Union. Social Psychological Bulletin, 15(1), 1–21.
• Clarke, H. D., Goodwin, M., Goodwin, M., & Whiteley, P. (2017). Brexit. Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge University Press.
• Curtice, J. (2017). Why leave won the UK’s EU referendum. Journal of Common Market Studies, 55, 19–37.
• Dankmar, B. (1999). Computer-assisted Analysis of Mixtures and Applications: Meta-analysis, disease mapping and others. CRC.
• De Grauwe, P. (2016). What Future for the EU After Brexit? Intereconomics, 51(5), 249–251.
• De Vries, C. E. (2017). Benchmarking Brexit: How the British Decision to Leave Shapes EU Public Opinion. Journal of Common Market Studies, 55, 38–53.
• De Vries, C. E. (2018). Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration. Oxford University Press.
• Diamond, P., Nedergaard, P., Rosamond, B., & Lequesne, C. (Eds.) (2018). The Routledge handbook of the politics of Brexit. Routledge Abingdon.
• Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy, Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150.
• Duodu, F. (2018). Brexit: Britain has Voted to Leave. An individual assessment of Britain’s 2016 EU Referendum vote. Political Science III. Stockholm University.
• Duszczyk, M. (2018). European Union at the crossroads: Which route will Poland take? In C. Schweiger, A. Visvizi (Eds.), Central and Eastern Europe in the EU (pp. 73–89). Taylor & Francis.
• Fabbrini, F. (2020). Brexit and the Future of the European Union. The Case for Constitutional Reforms. Oxford University Press.
• Feldman, M. (2019). On radical right mainstreaming in Europe and the US. In P. Bevelander, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Europe at the Crossroads: Confronting Populist, Nationalist and Global Challenges (pp. 23–48). Nordic Academic Press.
• Fetzer, T. (2019). Did austerity cause Brexit? American Economic Review, 109(11), 3849–3886.
• Fiszer, J. M. (2017). Szanse i zagrożenia dla Unii Europejskiej po Brexicie. Implikacje dla Polski. Myśl Ekonomiczna i Polityczna, 4(59), 213–249.
• Fomina, J. (2019). Of “Patriots” and Citizens: Asymmetric Populist Polarisation in Poland. In T. Carothers, & A. O’Donohue (Eds.), Democracies Divided. The Global Challenge of Political Polarization (pp. 126–152). Brookings Institution Press.
• Gastinger, M. (2021). Introducing the EU Exit Index Measuring Each Member State’s Propensity to Leave the European Union. European Union Politics, 22(3), 566–585.
• Goldston, J. A. (2018). Populism’s Corrupt Core. https://www.projectsyndicate.org/commentary/exposingpopulist-corruption-saves-liberaldemocracy-by-james-a–goldston-2018-07
• Hadjimichalis, C. (2021). An Uncertain Future for the post-Brexit, postCOVID-19 European Union. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28(1), 8–13.
• Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit Vote: A Divided Nation, a Divided Continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259–1277.
• Hobolt, S. B., Leeper, T. J., & Tilley, J. (2021, October). Divided by the Vote: Affective Polarisation in the Wake of the Brexit Referendum. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1476–1493.
• Hofelich, T. (2021). De facto differentiation in action: Why Poland will stay in the EU, with or without the blessing of Brussels. EUROPP Blog.
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2005). Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration. European Union Politics, 6(4), 419–443.
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2007). Sources of Euroscepticism. Acta Politica, 42(2), 119–127.
• Hubner, D. (2020). Talking Europe at the Time of Brexit. Scholar Publishing House.
• Jacobson, G. C. (2013). Partisan Polarisation in American Politics: A Background Paper. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 43(4), 688–708.
• Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1995). Continuous Univariate Distributions Vol. 2. John Wiley & Sons.
• Judis, J. B. (2016). The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics. Columbia Global Reports.
• Kaczorowska, M. (2016). Krajobraz polityczny po Brexicie. International Affairs, 69(3).
• (2021). Czy Polska powinna pozostać w Uunii Europejskiej? https://tvn24.pl/polska/czypolska-powinna-pozostacw-unii-europejskiej-sondaz-5410068
• Kozłowski, A. R. (2019). Populism as a Factor of Destabilisation in Consolidated Democracies. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, XII(2), 81–108.
• Krugman, P. (2016, December 27). European Populism and Trumpist Populism: Real vs Phony? The Business Times.
• Leruth, B., Ganzle, S., & Trondal, J. (2019). Exploring Differentiated Disintegration in a Post-Brexit European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(5), 1013–1030.
• Lindsay, B. G. (1995). Mixture models: Theory, Geometry, and Applications. Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
• MacLahlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. John Wiley & Sons.
• Marks, G., & Steenbergen, M. R. (Eds.) (2004). European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge University Press.
• Marszałek-Kawa, J., & Plecka, D. (2015). Political culture and the democratisation of a political regime. The case of Poland after 1989. European Journal of Transformation Studies, 3(2), 24–40.
• Matti, J., & Zhou, Y. (2017). The Political Economy of Brexit. Explaining the Vote. Applied Economics Letters, 24(16), 1131–1134.
• Medrano, J. D. (2003). Framing Europe. Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Princeton University Press.
• Norman, L. (2021). To Democratise or to Protect? How the Response to Anti-System Parties Reshapes the EU’s Transnational Party System. Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(3): 721–737.
• O’Rourke, K. H. (2017). Brexit, Political Shock Absorbers, and the Three Rs. In T. Beck, & G. Underhill (Eds.), Quo Vadis? Identity, Policy and the Future of the European Union (pp. 87–92). CEPR Press.
• Ostiguy, P., & Roberts, K. M. (2016). Putting Trump in Comparative Perspective: Populism and the Politicization of the Sociocultural Law. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 23(1), 25–50.
• Patel, O., & Reh, C. (2016). Brexit: The consequences for the EU’s political system, UCL Constitution Unit Briefing Paper. Economic and Social Research Council.
• Rashkova, E. R. (2021). The future of Europe and the role of Eastern Europe in its past, present and future. European Political Science, 20(2), 237–242.
• Rohrschneider, R. (2002). The Democracy Deficit and Mass Support for an EU-wide Government. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 463–475.
• Schweiger, C., & Visvizi, A. (Eds.) (2018). Central and Eastern Europe in the EU. Taylor & Francis.
• Shotter, J., & Foy, H. (2021, October 22). How Poland became Europe’s biggest rebel. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/d59e9054-95ba4093-b1cf-3ead1bae0982
• Sides, J., & Hopkins, D. J. (2015). Political Polarisation in American Politics. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
• Stankiewicz, A. (2016). Polacy nie chcą opuszczać UE. Rzeczpospolita. https://www.rp.pl/swiat/art3537771-polacy-nie-chca-opuszczacue#ap-2
• Stasinopoulos, M., Rigby, R., Heller, G., Voudouris, V., & Bastiani, F. D. (2017). Flexible Regression and Smoothing. Using GAMLSS in R. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
• Staunton, E. (2022). “France is Back”: Macron’s European policy to rescue “European civilisation” and the liberal international order. Third World Quarterly, 43(1), 18–34.
• Stout, C. T. (2020). The Case for Identity Politics: Polarisation, Demographic Change, and Racial Appeals. University of Virginia Press.
• Sus, M., & Hadeed, M. (2021). The transformation of political elites in the European Union after 2008. What is next after the constraining dissensus? Journal of European Integration, 43(4), 421–437.
• Sweeney, C. J. (2020). Democratic Backsliding and Political Polarization in Poland: Explaining the Erosion of Judicial and Media Freedoms. Master’s thesis. Universitat Wien.
• Szczerbiak, A. (2017). Should the EU be concerned about a possible “Polexit”? EUROPP Blog. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/09/08/should-theeu-be-concerned-about-a-possible-polexit
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.
• Torreblanca, J. I., & Leonard, M. (2013). The Continent-wide Rise of Euroscepticism. Pan-European thinktank. The European Council on Foreign Relations.
• Trosiak, C. (2020). Conditions for Initiating the Procedure of Poland’s Withdrawal from the European Union. Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej, 14, 215– 226.
• Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley.
• Usherwood, S., & Startin, N. (2013). Euroscepticism as a persistent phenomenon. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(1), 1–16.
• Yitzhaki, S., & Schechtman, E. (2013). The Gini Methodology: A Primer on a Statistical Methodology. Springer.
• Zaichuk, O., & Zaichuk, Y. (2020). Brexit–An Opportunity for Engagement? A Case for Smart Referenda. Yearbook of Ukrainian Law, 12, 33–37.
• Zalas-Kamińska, K. (2019). Polexit Narrative: A Case Study in Terms of Political Communication. Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne, 64(4), 203– 215.