Meta-Systemic Model of Transformation: A General Complexity-Based Approach in Political Science and International Relations

System-based research remains an important yet usually outdated and internally contradictory approach in political science and international relations. Based on concepts borrowed from physiology, cybernetics, and general system theory, the system-based approach popularised in the 1960s was cast away as outdated and ill-focused. Despite those systems, the theory was developed in natural sciences, eventually creating a paradigm more applicable to domestic and international politics. The weakest element of past systems (like the one proposed by D. Easton) was that they did not allow for a sudden and catastrophic transformation and lacked emergence. This paper aims to present a model that would allow for the system’s ordinary and catastrophic transformation. The complex adaptive system features were defined using relevant literature on a paradigm of complexity. Connecting it with the propositions of D. Easton, R. Axelrod, and M. Cohen, as well as R. Jervis, such a model was constructed. The theoretical introduction is supplanted with a general case study of the early phases of the Arab Spring in Tunisia. The model mirrors the complex systems’ dynamics, considering the agent-structure problem.

REFERENCES:

• Abouzeid, R. (2011). Bouazizi: The Man Who Set Himself and Tunisia on Fire. Time. https://web.archive.org/web/20110122064850/http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2043557,00.html
• Axelrod, R., & Cohen, M. (2000). Harnessing Complexity: Organisational Implications of a Scientific Frontier. Basic Books.
• Ball, P. (2004). Critical Mass, How One Thing Leads to Another. Farras, Straus and Giroux.
• Beaumont, P. (2013). Mohammed Bouazizi: the dutiful son whose death changed Tunisia’s fate. The Guardian. https://web.archive.org/web/20130729101326/http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/20/tunisian-fruit-seller-mohammed-bouazizi
• Benbya, H., & McKelvey, B. (2006). Toward a complexity theory of information systems development. Information Technology & People, 19(1).
• Bertalanaffy von, L. (1984). Ogólna teoria systemów: podstawy, rozwój, zastosowania. PWN.
• Busquet, A. (2011). Complexity theory, systems thinking and international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 24(1).
• Condorelli R. (2016). Complex Systems Theory: Some Considerations for Sociology. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 6, 422–448.
• Easton, D. (1965). A System Analysis of Political Life. University of Chicago Press.
• Easton, D. (1969). The New Revolution in Political Science. The American Political Science Review, 63(4).
• European Parliament Sakharov Awards 2011, Mohamed Bouazizi – 2011, “Arab Spring”. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sakharovprize/en/mohamed-bouazizi-2011-arab-spring-tunisi/productsdetails/20200331CAN54202
• Fahim, K. (2011). Slap to a Man’s Pride Set Off Tumult in Tunisia. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/22/world/africa/22sidi.html?_r=1&pagewanted=2&src=twrhp
• Gałganek, A. (2020). Filozofia Nauki o Stosunkach Międzynarodowych. Universitas.
• Grobman, G. M. (2005). Complexity Theory: a new way to look at organisational change. Public Administration Quarterly, 29(3).
• Gunitsky, S. (2013). Complexity and theories of change in international politics. International Theory, 5(1).
• Holland, J. H. (2014). Complexity. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
• Karwat, M. (2017). Uczestnictwo i poczucie uczestnictwa. Analiza pojęć. Eastern Review, 6.
• Korotayev, A., Issaev, L., Malkov, S., & Shishkina, A. (2014). The Arab Spring: A Quantitative Analysis. Arab Studies Quarterly, 36(2).
• Louth, J. (2009). Imagining a Complex World, Doctoral dissertation. University of Adelaide.
• Marszałek-Kawa, J., & Dmochowski, T. (Eds.) (2021). Selected Socio-Economic and International Relations Issues in Contemporary Asian States. Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
• Mitchel, M. (2009). Complexity. A Guided Tour. Oxford University Press.
• Murphy, E. (2014). Complex Adaptive Systems and the Development of Force Structures for the United States Air Force. Air University Press.
• Page, S. (2015). What Sociologists Should Know about Complexity. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 21–41.
• Poston, T., & Stewart, I. (1978). Catastrophe Theory and its Applications. Pitman.
• Potulski, J. (2015). Współczesne problemy badawcze w politologii. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
• Querido, A., & van Gijn, J. (1994). The Wisdom of the Body: the Usefulness of Systems Thinking for Medicine, The Discipline of Medicine: Emerging Concepts and their Impact upon Medical Research and Medical Education. KNAW/Elsevier.
• Thurner, S., Hanel, R., & Klimek, P. (2018). Introduction to the Theory of Complex Systems. Oxford University Press.
• Wendt, A. (1987). The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. International Organisation, 41(3), 335–370.
• Wolfe, E. L., Barger, A. C., & Benison, S. (2000). Walter B. Cannon, science and society. Boston Medical Library.
• Zdanowski, J. (2020). Historia Najnowsza Bliskiego Wschodu i Afryki Północnej. Wydawnictwo Akademickie Dialog.
• Zeeman, E. C. (1976). Catastrophe Theory. Scientific American.