The Impact of Brexit on the Transformation of Majoritarian Democracy in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

The article attempts to answer whether, and if so, to what extent, the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union (the so-called Brexit) impacted the British model of democracy. The starting point for the analysis is the famous classification of Arend Lijphart, who distinguished two main models of democracy – Westminster and consensus – identifying the United Kingdom as a prime example of the first of them. Using the method of institutional and legal analysis and the historical method, the author tries to prove the thesis that Brexit has shaken the foundations of the majoritarian democracy in the United Kingdom. However, the transformations of this model are not a new phenomenon, as they are part of the trend of changes occurring in this country, at least since the end of the 1990s. The article also proves the thesis that the serious political and systemic tensions to which Brexit – for very different reasons – led can be treated as temporary, as there is little indication that these tensions would permanently undermine the foundations of the Westminster model of democracy in the United Kingdom.

REFERENCES:

• Bagehot, W. (1867). The English Constitution. Oxford University Press.
• Baldini, G., Bressanelli, E., & Massetti, E. (2018). Who is in control? Brexit and the Westminster Model. The Political Quarterly, 89(4), 537–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12596
• Baldini, G., Bressanelli, E., & Massetti, E. (2022). Back to the Westminster model? The Brexit process and the UK political system. International Political Science Review, 43(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120967375
• Baldini, G., Bressanelli, E., & Massetti, E. (2023). The Brexit Effect. What Leaving the EU Means for British Politics. Routledge.
• Bogdanor, V. (2001). Devolution in the United Kingdom. Oxford University Press.
• Bogdanor, V. (2009). The New British Constitution. Hart Publishing.
• Bogdanor, V. (2019). Beyond Brexit: Towards a British Constitution. I.B. Tauris.
• Bogdanor, V. (2011). The Coalition and the Constitution. Hart Publishing.
• Busch, A. (1994). Central bank independence and the Westminster model. West European Politics, 17(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425001
• Cabinet Office. (2010, December 14). The Cabinet Manual. A guide to laws, conventions and rules on the operation of government. UK Government. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cabinet-manual
• Constitution Committee – Twelfth Report. (2011, March 7). The Cabinet Manual, UK Parliament. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201011/ldselect/ldconst/107/10702.htm
• Cutts, D., Goodwin, M., Heath, O., & Surridge, P. (2020). Brexit, the 2019 General Election and the Realignment of British Politics. The Political Quarterly, 91(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12815
• Dahl, R. (1956). A Preface to Democratic Theory. University of Chicago Press.
• Danel, Ł. (2017). Brytyjskie dylematy konstytucyjne “Pytania z West Lothian”. Studia Polityczne, 45(4), 109–127.
• Danel, Ł. (2018). Prawno-konstytucyjne implikacje wystąpienia Wielkiej Brytanii z Unii Europejskiej – perspektywa brytyjska. Politeja, 15(3(54)), 163–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.15.2018.54.11
• Danel, Ł. (2021). Wybory do brytyjskiej Izby Gmin z 2019 roku – kryzys czy tryumf demokracji? In J. Jaskiernia, & K. Spryszak (Eds.), Wyzwania dla europejskiego systemu ochrony praw człowieka u progu trzeciej dekady XXI wieku. T. 2 (pp. 992–1006). Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
• Danel, Ł. (2022). Zrozumieć Brexit. Przyczyny wystąpienia Zjednoczonego Królestwa Wielkiej Brytanii i Irlandii Północnej z Unii Europejskiej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
• Dixon, R. G. (1968). Democratic Representation: Reapportionment in Law and Politics. Oxford University Press.
• European Union (Withdrawal) Bill 2017–2019.
• Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011.
• Flinders, M. (2002). Shifting the Balance? Parliament, the Executive and the British Constitution. Political Studies, 50(2), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00357
• Flinders, M. (2005). Majoritarian Democracy in Britain: New Labour and the Constitution. West European Politics, 28(1), 61–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238042000297099
• Flinders, M. (2010). Democratic Drift. Majoritarian Modification and Democratic Anomie in the United Kingdom. Oxford University Press.
• Flinders, M., Judge, D., Rhodes, R. A. W., & Vatter, A. (2022). ‘Stretched But Not Snapped’: A Response to Russell and Serban on Retiring the ‘Westminster Model’. Government and Opposition, 57(2), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.19
• Giddings, P., & Drewry, G. (2004). Britain in the European Union – Law, Policy and Parliament. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Giuliani, M. (2022). Westminster as Usual? Three Interpretations for UK Democracy. Government and Opposition, 57(3), 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.20
• Hazell, R. (Ed.) (2008). Constitutional Futures Revisited. Britain’s Constitution to 2020. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Laver, M., & Schofield, N. (1990). Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford University Press.
• Leyland, P. (2012). The Constitution of the United Kingdom. A Contextual Analysis. Hart Publishing.
• Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Yale University Press.
• Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Yale University Press.
• Mansbridge, J. (1980). Beyond Adversary Democracy. Basic Books.
• Matthews, F. (2015). Inaction and Reaction – Coalition Government and Constitutional Reform in the United Kingdom. British Politics, 10, 308–334. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.34
• Mitchell, J. (2009). Devolution in the UK. Manchester University Press.
• Quinn, T., Bara, J., & Bartle, J. (2011). The UK Coalition Agreement of 2010: Who Won? Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 21(2), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2011.562610
• Rhodes, R. A. W., Wanna, J., & Weller, P. (2009). Comparing Westminster. Oxford University Press.
• Riker, W. (1962). The Theory of Political Coalitions. Yale University Press.
• Russell, M. (2010). A Stronger Second Chamber? Asserting the Impact of House of Lords Reform in 1999 and the Lessons for Bicameralism. Political Studies, 58(5), 866–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00810.x
• Russell, M., & Cowley, P. (2018). Modes of UK Executive-Legislative Relations Revisited. The Political Quarterly, 89(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12463
• Russell, M., & Lodge, G. (2005, November). Westminster and the English Question. University College London. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/sites/constitution-unit/files/128.pdf
• Russell, M., & Serban, R. (2021). The Muddle of the ‘Westminster Model’: A Concept Stretched Beyond Repair. Government and Opposition, 56(4), 744–764. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2020.12
• Russell, M., & Serban, R. (2022). Why it is indeed time for the Westminster model to be retired from comparative politics. Government and Opposition, 57(2), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.49
• Strohmeier, G. (2015). Does Westminster (still) represent the Westminster model? An analysis of the changing nature of the UK’s political system. European View, 14, 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-015-0368-0
• Vospernik, S. (2018). A perfect match? Referendums and consensus democracy in Europe. Participations, 20(1), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.3917/parti.020.0143
• Żukiewicz, P. (2020). Koalicje w systemie politycznym Nowej Zelandii. Od klasycznych do sieciowych porozumień. Instytut Politologii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.