Sustaining and Growing Innovations in Democracy and Co-Creation

  • Author: Susan Baines
  • Institution: Manchester Metropolitan University (the United Kingdom)
  • ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3859-9448
  • Year of publication: 2023
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 13-25
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202350
  • PDF: ppsy/52/ppsy202350s.pdf

Co-creation of public services implies new roles and responsibilities that, at least potentially, change the balance of control. In this way, it aligns closely with democratic renewal. This paper draws on the outcomes of a collaborative innovation project Co-creation of Service Innovation in Europe (CoSIE) funded under Horizon 2020. CoSIE built upon the idea that public sector innovations can be best achieved by creating collaborative partnerships between service providers (public sector agencies, third sector organisations, private companies) and citizens who receive services directly or indirectly. CoSIE was implemented through ten real-life innovation pilots in different public services across Europe. Results showed how co-creative methods could promote democratic dimensions, increasing the civic participation of marginalised and often voiceless population groups (residents of depleted urban neighbourhoods, disabled people in remote rural areas, citizens adrift from the world of work, and non-EU migrants). Some CoSIE pilots were more successful than others in extending impact beyond their immediate localities and service contexts. The paper highlights common factors that helped share learning and evolve project innovations into the ‘modus operandi’ of institutions and societies.

REFERENCES:

  • Albury, D., Beresford, T., Dew, S., Horton, T., Illingworth, J., & Langford, K. (2018). Against the Odds: Successfully Scaling Innovation in the NHS. The Health Foundation.
  • Arnstein, S. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224.
  • Baines, S., Wilson, R., Narbutaite Aflaki, I., Wiktorska-Święcka, A., Bassi, A., & Jalonen, H. (2022). Editorial: Innovating ‘co-creative’ relationships between services, citizens and communities. Public Money & Management, 42(5), 295–297.
  • Bonvin, J. M., & Laruffa, F. (2018). Human beings as receivers, doers and judges. The anthropological foundations of sustainable public action in the capability approach. Community, Work & Family, 21(5), 502–518.
  • Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2018). Definitions of Co-Production and Co-Creation. In T. Brandsen, T. Steen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Co-Production and Co-Creation. Routledge.
  • Brandsen, T., Evers, A. Cattacin, S., & Zimmer, A. (2016). Social Innovation: A Sympathetic and Critical Interpretation. In T. Bransden, A. Cattacin, S. Evers, & A. Zimmer (Eds.), Social Innovations in the Urban Context (pp. 3–20). Springer International Publishing.
  • CoSIE. (2021). CoSIE Innovations. https://cosie.turkuamk.fi/arkisto/innovations/index.html
  • Cottam, H. (2018). Radical help: How we can remake the relationships between us and revolutionise the Welfare State. Hachette UK.
  • Csoba, J., & Sipos, F. (2022). Politically-driven public administration or co-creation? On the possibility of modernizing public services in rural Hungary. Public Money & Management, 42(5), 314–322.
  • Driss, O. B., Mellouli, S., & Trabelsi, Z. (2019). From citizens to government policy-makers. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 560–570.
  • Dudau, A., Glennon, R., & Verschuere, B. (2019). Following the yellow brick road? (Dis)enchantment with co-design, co-production and value co-creation in public services’. Public Management Review, 21(11), 1577–1594.
  • EESC, European Economic and Social Committee. (2016). Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Social innovation, networking and digital communication’ (own initiative opinion). Official Journal of the European Union, 2016/C013/16. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52014IE4902&from=EN
  • Evers, A., & Brandsen, T. (2016). Social Innovations as Messages: Democratic Experimentation in Local Welfare Systems. In T. A. Brandsen, S. Cattacin, A. Evers, & A. Zimmer (Eds.), Social Innovations in the Urban Context (pp. 161–180). Springer International Publishing.
  • Fox, C. (forthcoming). Understanding Co-creation: strengths and capabilities. In S. Baines, R. Wilson, C. Fox, I. Narbutaite Aflaki, A. Bassi, & R. Prandini (Eds.), Co-creation in public services for innovation and social justice: Concrete Elasticity. The Policy Press.
  • Fox, C., Baines, S., Wilson, R., Jalonen, H., Narbutaite Aflaki, I., Prandini, R., Bassi, A., Ganugi, G., & Aramo- Immonen, H. (2021). A new agenda for co-creating public services. Turku University of Applied Sciences. http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522167842.pdf
  • Fox, C., Grimm, R., & Caldeira, R. (2016). An Introduction to Evaluation. SAGE.
  • Jalonen, H., Jäppinen, T., & Bugarszki, Z. (2019). Co-creation of Social Innovation Policy Brief: Co-creation of Service Innovation in Europe (CoSIE). https://docplayer.net/200121040-Co-creation-of-socialinnovation.html
  • Jamieson, D., & Martin, M. (2022). Supporting Co-Creation processes through modelling: The development of a Digital Modelling tool for complex service innovation environments. Public Money & Management, 42(5), 353–355.
  • Kangro, K., & Lepik, K-L. (2022). Co-creating public services in social hackathons: adapting the original hackathon concept. Public Money & Management, 42(5), 341–348.
  • Kazepov, Y., Saruis, T., & Colombo, F. (2019). Consolidating Social Innovation. In S. Oosterlynck, A. Novy, & Y. Kazepov (Eds.), Local Social Innovation to Combat Poverty and Exclusion. The Policy Press.
  • Lember, V., Brandsen, T., & Tonurist, P. (2019). The potential impacts of digital technologies on coproduction and co-creation. Public Management Review, 21(11), 1665–1686.
  • Moulaert, F., & MacCallum, D. (2019). Advanced Introduction to Social Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishers.
  • Narbutaité Aflaki, I., & Lindh, M. (2021). Empowering first-line managers as change leaders towards co-creation culture: the role of facilitated sensemaking. Public Money & Management. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2021.2007636
  • Oosterlynck, S., Novy, A., & Kazepov, Y. (Eds.) (2019). Local Social Innovation to Combat Poverty and Exclusion. The Policy Press.
  • Osborne, S. P. (2018). From Public Service-dominant Logic to Public Service Logic: Are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation? Public Management Review, 20(2), 225–231.
  • Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653.
  • Phills J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43.
  • Sen, A. (1990). Development as Capability Expansion. In K. Griffin, & J. Knight (Eds.), Human Development and the International Development Strategy for the 1990s (pp. 41–58). Macmillan.
  • Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford Paperbacks.
  • Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration & Society, 51(5), 795–825.
  • Trowbridge, H., & Willoughby, M. (2022). Debate: Re-Humanising the System or: How storytelling can be used to bridge the divide between services and citizens. Public Money & Management, 42(5), 298–299.
  • Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357.

co-creation public services Social innovations lived experience evaluation

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart