Co-Creation of Local Development and Effective Public Participation. Sozialer Zusammenhalt („Social Cohesion”) Programme in Berlin as an Example of Practice

Co-creation of public policy can be considered a democratic innovation, all the more so as this approach seems to secure the possibility of „redefining what is democracy”. Understood this way, it is a direct source of changes in urban governance systems. Hence, the essence of the considerations is reflection on co-creation as a principle regulating the current urban governance practices and public participation in Berlin. The subject of the analysis in the empirical part of the paper is the Sozialer Zusammenhang („Social Cohesion”) Programme implemented since 2020. The aim is to present the specificity accompanying co-creation with citizens and evaluate the solutions’ effectiveness. Particular attention is paid to the key issue of what institutional arrangements support co-creation in a specific local context, i.e., at the neighbourhood level, and to discuss to what extent they can be considered effective public participation.

REFERENCES:

• Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2021). Public Governance as Co-creation. Cambridge University Press.
• Baines, S., Wilson, R., Fox, C., Narbutaite Aflaki, I., Bassi, A., Aramo-Immonen, H., & Prandini, R. (2023). Concrete and Elasticity – Co-creation in public services: policy and practice for innovation and social justice. Polity Press.
• Bevir, M. (2013). A Theory of Governance. University of California Press.
• Checkoway, B. (2011). What is youth participation? Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 340–345.
• Erlingsson, G., Karlsson, D., Wide, G., & Öhrwall, R. (2022). SNS Democracy Council report 2022: Local Democracy at a Crossroads. SNS.
• Fox, C., Baines, S., Wilsson, R., Jallonen, H., Narbutaite-Aflaki, I., Prandini, R., Bassi, A., Ganugi, G., & Aaramo-Immonen, H. (2021). A New Agenda for Co-creating Public Services. Turku University of Applied Sciences.
• Hendrikx, W., Kuiper M., & Van Gestel, N. (2020). Scientific Report on the Conditions for Involvement of Professionals in the Strategic Renewal of Local Governments and Public Agencies, Possible Impediments and Counteracting Mechanisms. CoGOV Project Report, D6.1. cogov.eu
• Henn, M., & Foard, N. (2012). Young People, Political Participation and Trust in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs, 65(1), 47–67.
• Jukić, T., Hržica, R., Vrbek, S., Benčina, R., Dečman, M., Pevcin, P., Jaman, P., Puzjak, M., Rilko, D., Subašić, A., & Gilja, B. (2020). Decision support system for assessment of organisational readiness for co-creation. CoGOV Project Report, D7.1. cogov.eu
• Leino, H. (2008). Kansalaisosallistuminen kaupunkisuunnittelussa: rajaorganisaatioita vai hybridien hallintaa? Alue ja Ympäristö, 37(2), 41–48.
• Narbutaite-Aflaki, I., & Lindh, M. (2021). Empowering first-line managers as leaders towards methodical co-creation: the role of facilitated sense-making. Public Money and Management. Nuorisoasiainkeskus. (2013).
• Nuorisoasiainkeskus lanseeraa osallistuvan budjetoinnin pilotin: RuutiBudjetin. Helsinki: Nuorisoasiainkeskus.
• Peart, M., Cubo-Delgado, S., & Gutiérrez-Esteban, P. (2022). Exploring the role of digital and socio-civic skills for promoting youth participation and digital citizenship. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 697–709.
• Pickard, S., & Bessant, J. (2018). Young People Re-Generating Politics in Times of Crises. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Pihlaja, R., & Sandberg, S. (2012). Alueellista demokratiaa? Lähidemokratian toimintamallit Suomen kunnissa. Valtiovarainministeriön julkaisuja, 27.
• Sooväli-Sepping, H. (Toim.) (2020). Eesti inimarengu aruanne 2019/2020. Linnastunud ühiskonna ruumilised valikud. Tallinn: SA Eesti Koostöö Kogu.
• Sørensen, E., Hendriks, C. M., Hertting, N., & Edelenbos, J. (2020) Political boundary spanning: politicians at the interface between collaborative governance and representative democracy. Policy and Society, 39(4).
• Suomen Nuorisovaltuustojen Liitto. (2020) Nuvalaisen käsikirja. Suomen Nuorisovaltuustojen Liitto ry.
• Torfing, J., Sørenssen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2016). Transforming the public sector into an arena for cocreation: barriers, drivers, benefits and ways forward. Administration and Society, 51(5), 795–825.
• Tuurnas, S. (2016). The Professional Side of Co-production. Tampere University.