Multi-Domain Concept of Using A2/AD Capabilities in the Military Strategy of the Russian Federation

This article presents the results of research, which set out to clarify the importance and role played by the concept of using A2/AD capabilities in the military strategy of the Russian Federation. Analysis and criticism of the literature were used to solve the research problems. In order to guide the research process, a hypothesis was formulated, assuming that the Russian concept of using A2/AD capabilities is an operationalisation of a broader military strategy for defeating the adversary, as well as an effective deterrence mechanism. The research process established that the Russian concept of using A2/AD capabilities is a theory and operational practice, a broader military strategy of achieving multi-domain superiority over the adversary by conducting strategic offensive operations. Integrating offensive and defensive operational capabilities plays a key role in this concept, which guarantees possession of the strategic initiative and maintenance of dominance in the international security environment and supports the idea of creating Russian spheres of influence. It also prompts NATO states to counter the supremacy of the Russian Federation.

REFERENCES:

• Adamsky, D. (2018). From Moscow with Coercion: Russian Deterrence Theory and Strategic Culture. Journal of Strategic Studies, 41(1), 1–28. DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2017.1347872
• Adamsky, (2020). Discontinuity in Russian Strategic Culture? A Case Study of Mission Command Practice. Security Insights, 49, 1–9.
• Banasik, M. (2021). Rywalizacja, presja i agresja Federacji Rosyjskiej. Konsekwencje dla bezpieczeństwa międzynarodowego. Warszawa.
• Belousov I. I., & Kokoshin A. A. (2014). Outstanding theorist and military commander Alexander Andreevich Svechin. On his life, ideas, works, and hopes for our society and society. Voprosy historii, 4.
• Bogdanov, S. A., & Chekinov, S. G. (2013). On the Character and Content of Wars of a New Generation. Voennaya Mysl, 10, 13–24.
• Bonds, T. M., Predd, J. B., Heath, T. R., Chase, M. S., Johnson, M., Lostumbo, M. J., Bonomo, J., Mane, M., & Steinberg, P. S. (2017). What Role Can Land-Based, Multi-Domain Anti-Access/Area Denial Forces Play in Deterring or Defeating Aggression? Santa Monica.
• Borshchevskaya, A. (2020). The Role of the Military in Russian Politics and Foreign Policy Over the Past 20 Years. Orbis, 64(3), 434–446. DOI: 10.1016/j.orbis.2020.05.006
• Bowen, A.S., (2020, August 20). Russian Armed Forces: Military Doctrine and Strategy. Congressional Research Service. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/IF11625.pdf
• Bredesen, M. G., & Friis, K. (2020). Missiles, Vessels and Active Defence. What Potential Threat Do the Russian Armed Forces Represent? The RUSI Journal Volume, 165(5-6), 68–78. DOI: 10.1080/03071847.2020.1829991
• Bruusgaard, K. V. (2016). Russian Strategic Deterrence. Survival, 58(4). DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2016.1207945
• Buyanovski, S., & Runov, V. (2016). Maneuver Defense: Role and Place in Battle. Armeiskiy Sbornik, 1, 22–26.
• Defense Activity. Ministry of RF. https://encyclopedia.mil.ru/encyclopedia/dictionary/details.htm?id=2750@morfDictionary
• Depczyński, M., Markiewicz, S., & Wrzosek, M. (2022). Challenges and Threats to Military Reconnaissance and Radio Combat from the Aspect of the Anti-Access System. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 35(1), 73–93. DOI: 10.1080/13518046.2022.2045798
• Dinicu, A. (2014). Cyber threats to national security. Specific features and actors involved. Scientific Bulletin of the “Nicolae Bălcescu” Land Forces Academy, 2(38), 109–113.
• Elak, L. (2018). Tactical Determinants of A2/AD Operations. Zeszyty Naukowe ASzWoj, 3(112), 5–20. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.08
• Erdogan, E. (2018). Russian A2AD Strategy and its Implications for NATO. Beyond the Horizon International Strategic Studies. https://behorizon.org/russian-a2ad-strategy-and-its-implications-for-nato
• Gerasimov, V. (2016). The Value of Science is in the Foresight New Challenges Demand Rethinking the Forms and Methods of Carrying out Combat Operations. Military Review January-February, 23–29.
• Giles, K., & Boulegue, M. (2019). Russia's A2/AD Capabilities: Real and Imagined. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 49(1), 21–36. DOI: 10.55540/0031-1723.2860
• Kartapolov, A. V. (2015). Lessons of Military Conflicts and Prospects for the Development of Resources and Methods of Conducting Them. Direct and Indirect Actions in Contemporary International Conflicts. Vestnik Academii Voennykh Nayk, 2(51), 26–36.
• Kofman, M. (2019). It’s Time to Talk About A2/AD: Rethinking the Russian Military Challenge. War on Rock. https://warontherocks.com/2019/09/its-time-to-talk-about-a2-ad-rethinking-the-russian-military-challenge
• Kofman, M., Fink, A., Gorenburg, D., Chesnut, M., Edmonds, J., & Waller, J. (2021). Russian Military Strategy: Core Tenets and Operational Concepts. Stuttgart.
• Kondakov, E. E. (2022). Nonmilitary measures of ensuring the military security of the Russian Federation and the main problems of their realisation. https://flot.com/publications/books/shelf/safety/11.htm
• Krepinevich, A., Watts, B., & Work, R. (2003). Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge. Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
• Kristensen, H. M., & Korda, M. (2022). Russian nuclear weapons. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Volume, 78, 98–121. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.2022.2038907
• Lasconjarias, G. (2019). NATO’s Response to Russian A2/AD in the Baltic States: Going Beyond Conventional? Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 2(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.18
• Lasconjarias, G., & Marrone, A. (2016). How to Respond to Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD)? Towards a NATO Counter-A2/AD Strategy. NDC Conference Report, 1, 1–12.
• Leonkov, A. (2019). Vne zony dostupa: sistema A2/AD stala kamnem pretknoveniya dlya NATO. Rossiyskaya gazeta. https://rg.ru/2019/10/08/vne-zony-dostupa-sistema-a2ad-stala-kamnem-pretknoveniia-dlia-nato.html
• Mickiewicz, P., & Kasprzycki, D. (2021). Expanding The External Ring Of Russian Defense Policy In Practice: 2015–2020. The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies, 1, 55–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/CJPS.2021.003.
• Nechaev, A. (2020). Why NATO will not be able to copy the Russian A2/AD concept. Vzglyad. https://vz.ru/world/2020/1/26/1020242.html
• Paździorek, P. (2021). Operational Aspects of A2/AD Concept. Wiedza Obronna, 275(2), 43–70. DOI: 10.34752/2021-c275
• Petraitis, D. (2018). The Anatomy of Zapad-2017: Certain Features of Russian Military Planning. Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review, 16(1), 229–267. DOI: 10.2478/lasr-2018-0009
• Pietkiewicz, M. (2018). The Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 47(3), 505–520. http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/ppsy2018305
• Radomyski, A. (2021). Development of the Russian Anti Access/Anti Denial A2/AD Concept as a Threat to NATO and Poland. Torun International Studies, 1(14), 41–54. DOI: 10.12775/TIS.2021.00
• Russian First Deputy Defense Minister Gerasimov: 'Our Response' Is Based On The 'Active Defense Strategy'; 'We Must Act Quickly' To 'Preempt The Enemy... Identify His Vulnerabilities, and Create Threats of Unacceptable Damage to it'. (2019). Special Dispatch, 7943. https://www.memri.org/reports/russian-first-deputy-defense-minister-gerasimov-our-response-based-active-defense-strategy
• Shelomski, A., & Maksimov, M. (2020). Maneuver Defense: History and Modernity. Armeiskiy Sbornik, 5.
• Sokolov, A.G. (2019). Tendencies of development of military art. Nezavisimoe voennoe obozrenie, 36. https://nvo.ng.ru/realty/2019-10-04/1_1064_tendenzii.html
• Sukhankin, S. (2015). From ‘Bridge of Cooperation’ to A2/AD ‘Bubble’: The Dangerous Transformation of Kaliningrad Oblast. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 31(1), 15–35. DOI: 10.1080/13518046.2018.1416732
• Tangredi, S. J. (2013). A2/AD and Wars of Necessity. The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/commentary/a2-ad-wars-necessity-9524
• The Joint Operational Access Concept. (2012). Department of Defense USA. Washington. https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/JOAC_Jan%202012_Signed.pdf
• Tol, J. (2010). AirSea Battle: A Point-of-Departure Operational Concept. Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
• Trushin, V. V. (2020). On the Development of a Theory of Maneuver Defense. Military Thought, 3, 140–149.
• Voprosy sovremennoy strategii. Razvitie form voyny i strategii. (n.d.). http://militera.lib.ru/science/tuhachevsky/16.html#.
• West, S. D. (1999). Warden and the Air Corps Tactical School. Air University Press.
• Zarudnitskiy, V. B. (2021). Character and content of armed conflicts in modern conditions and near term perspective. Voennaya Mysl, 1, 34–43.