Decolonising Knowledge Production about Ukraine: A Security Aspect

  • Author: Ostap Kushnir
  • Institution: University of Portsmouth (United Kingdom)
  • ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4058-8059
  • Year of publication: 2024
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 139-153
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202434
  • PDF: ppsy/53-3/ppsy2024310.pdf

The article aims to identify some of the misrepresentations of Ukraine that originated in Russia and led to distorted perceptions of Ukraine in the English-speaking academia. Apart from that, the article aims to expose the reasons behind the emergence of such misrepresentations, the way to counter them, and the pitfalls of using them in security analysis. The article hypothesizes that the traditional colonial perception of Ukraine prevents Western scholars and policy-makers, whom these scholars consult, from adequately interpreting and securitizing the acuteness of the contemporary Russian threat. To complete the research, the article draws from decolonial and securitization theories. The article argues that the centuries-long othering and denial of agency of Ukraine, combined with the lack of specific expertise on the country and the colonial tradition of knowledge production, led to a comparatively inconsistent response of Western academia to the post-2014 Russian aggression against a sovereign nation. To address the existing inadequacy, Western scholars should become more open to the opinions of their Ukrainian colleagues, accept the merit of unconventional perspectives, and revise Russo-centrism in research frameworks and teaching curricula.

REFERENCES:

  • Aslund, Å. (2023, January 4). Opinion: The End of Post-Soviet Studies? The Kyiv Post. https://www.kyivpost.com/opinion/6385
  • Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security. A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Chernetsky, V. (2003). Postcolonialism, Russia and Ukraine. Ulbandus Review, 7, 32–62.
  • Chernetsky, V. (2006). On Some Post-Soviet Postcolonialisms. PMLA, 121(3), 833–836.
  • Dickinson, P. (2019, October 21). Kyiv not Kiev: Why Spelling Matters in Ukraine’s Quest for an Independent Identity. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/kyivnot-kiev-why-spelling-matters-in-ukraines-quest-for-an-independent-identity/
  • Donovan, V. (2023). Against Academic “Resourcification”: Collaboration as Delinking from Extractivist “Area Studies” Paradigms. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 65(2), 163–173. DOI: 10.1080/00085006.2023.2200669
  • Dudko, O. (2023). Gate-crashing “European” and “Slavic” Area Studies: Can Ukrainian Studies Transform the Fields? Canadian Slavonic Papers, 65(2), 174–189. DOI: 10.1080/00085006.2023.2202565
  • Goncharova, O. (2018, July 6). Honest History Episode 11: Saying “the Ukraine” Is More than a Mistake. The Kyiv Post. https://www.kyivpost.com/post/8043
  • Gretskiy, I. (2020). Lukyanov Doctrine: Conceptual Origins of Russia’s Hybrid Foreign Policy – The Case of Ukraine. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 64(1), 1–22.
  • Hansen, L. (2012). Reconstructing desecuritisation: the normative-political in the Copenhagen School and directions for how to apply it. Review of International Studies, 38(3), 525–546.
  • Hendl, T., Burlyukb, O., O’Sullivancand, M., & Arystanbek, A. (2024). (En)Countering epistemic imperialism: A critique of “Westsplaining” and coloniality in dominant debates on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Contemporary Security Policy, 45(2), 171–209. DOI: 10.1080/13523260.2023.2288468
  • Herbst, J., Kramer, D. J., & Taylor, W. (2023, February 24). Give Ukraine What It Wants. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/give-ukraine-what-it-wants-military-aid
  • Hosaka, S. (2023). A Way to “Toxic” Russian Studies: Stocktaking of Decolonizing, De-centering, and Rethinking Russian Studies. Working Paper for 7th Annual Tartu Conference on East European and Eurasian Studies 11-13 June 2023.
  • Huntington, S. P. (2011). Clash Of Civilizations And The Remaking Of World Order. Simon & Schuster.
  • Hyrych, I. (2022, July 28). “Ukraiina-Rus” chy “Kyivs’ka Rus”? Tsi Poniattia Maiut’ Riznyi Zmist – Istoryk [“Ukraine-Rus” or “Kyivan Rus”? These Concepts Have Different Meanings – Historian]. Radio Svoboda. https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/ukrayina-rus-terminolohiya/31530763.html
  • Jaroszewicz, M., & Grzymski, J. (2023). Securitization in the Shadow of Armed Conflict: The Internal Othering and Electoral Rights of IDPs in Ukraine. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 56(1), 1–22. DOI: 10.1525/cpcs.2022.1775572
  • Kamusella, T. (2023, September 5). Going Native: Russian Studies in the West. UAmoderna. https://uamoderna.com/war/going-native-russian-studies-in-the-west/
  • Kaplan, V. (2017). Historians and Historical Societies in the Public Life of Imperial Russia. Indiana University Press.
  • Kazharski, A. (2022, July 19). Explaining the “Westsplainers”: Can a Western Scholar Be an Authority on Central and Eastern Europe? Forum for Ukrainian Studies. https://ukrainian-studies.ca/2022/07/19/explaining-the-westsplainers-can-a-western-scholar-be-an-authority-on-central-and-eastern-europe/
  • Kazharski, A. (2023, March 17). Reasons for Russian Invasion of Ukraine: Realist, Liberal, and Constructivist Perspectives. Guest lecture at the University of Alberta.
  • Kohut, Z. E. (2001). Origins of the Unity Paradigm: Ukraine and the Construction of Russian National History (1620-1860). Eighteenth-Century Studies, 35(1), 70–76.
  • Kordan, B. (2022). Russia’s War Against Ukraine: Historical Narratives, Geopolitics, and Peace. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 64(2–3), 162–172. DOI: 10.1080/00085006.2022.2107835
  • Koval, N., Gaidai, O., Melnyk, M., Protsiuk, M., Tereshchenko, D., & Irysova, M. (2022). Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar Studies in the World: Problems, Needs, Perspectives. Ukrainian Institute. https://ui.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/ukrainian-and-crimean-tatar-studies-in-the-world_eng.pdf
  • Krapfl, J. (2023). Decolonizing Minds in the “Slavic Area,” “Slavic Area Studies,” and Beyond. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 65(2), 141–145. DOI: 10.1080/00085006.2023.2211460
  • Kulyk, V. (2020). Analizuiuchy Analityku: Pro Zasady Doslidzhennia Zahidnyh Naukovyh ta EkspertnoAnalitychnyh Publikatsii na Temu Rosiis’ko-Ukraiins’koho Konfliktu [Analyzing the Analysis: On the Principles of Research of Western Scientific and Expert-Analytical Publications on the Topic of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict]. In V. Kulyk (Ed.), Interpretatsii Rosiis’ko-Ukraiins’koho Konfliktu v Zahidnykh Naukovyh i Ekspertno-Analitychnyh Pratsiah (pp. 5–10). IPiEND im. I. F. Kurasa NAN Ukraiiny.
  • Kushnir, O. (2022). Overcoming “Otherness”: Central and Eastern European Nations and the Idea of “Europe.” The International Spectator, 57(4), 104–120. DOI: 10.1080/03932729.2022.2093934
  • Kuzio, T. (2018). Euromaidan Revolution, Crimea and Russia–Ukraine War: Why It Is Time for a Review of Ukrainian-Russian Studies. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 59(3–4), 529–53. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2019.1571428
  • Kuzio, T. (2019). Old Wine in a New Bottle: Russia’s Modernization of Traditional Soviet Information Warfare and Active Policies Against Ukraine and Ukrainians. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 32(4), 485–506. DOI: 10.1080/13518046.2019.1684002
  • Lawton, L. (1935, May 29). The Ukrainian Question and Its Importance for Great Britain. Speech to the House of Commons. http://willzuzak.ca/lp/lawton01.html
  • Lukas, E. (2019, March 25). It’s Time to Stop “Westsplaining.” Center for European Policy Analysis. https://cepa.org/article/its-time-to-stop-westsplaining/
  • Mälksoo, M. (2022). The Postcolonial Moment in Russia’s War Against Ukraine. Journal of Genocide Research, 25(3–4), 471–481. DOI: 10.1080/14623528.2022.2074947
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2022, June 23). The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine Crisis. The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/causes-and-consequences-ukraine-crisis-203182
  • Moore, D. C. (2001). Is the Post – in Postcolonial the Post – in Post-Soviet? Toward a Global Postcolonial Critique. PMLA, 116(1), 111–128.
  • Peppard, V. (2023). Teaching Russian Studies in the Wake of the War in Ukraine. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 65(2), 220–231. DOI: 10.1080/00085006.2023.2200671
  • Polegkyi, O. (2015). Identity-building in Post-communist Ukraine: Post-imperial vs Postcolonial Discourses. In B. Törnquist-Plewa, N. Bersand, & E. Narvselius (Eds.) Beyond Transition? Memory and Identity Narratives in Eastern and Central Europe (pp. 169–190). Centre for European Studies and Lund University.
  • Prince, T. (2023, January 1). Moscow’s Invasion Of Ukraine Triggers “Soul-Searching” At Western Universities As Scholars Rethink Russian Studies. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-war-ukraine-western-academia/32201630.html
  • Putin, V. (2021, July 12). On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians. President of Russia. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181
  • Riasanovski, N. V. (1963). A History of Russia. Oxford University Press.
  • Rudnytsky, I. L. (1963). The Role of the Ukraine in Modern History. Slavic Review, 22(2), 199–216.
  • Spivak, G. C. (2006). Are You Postcolonial? To the Teachers of Slavic and Eastern European Literatures. PMLA, 121(3), 828–829.
  • Stent, A. (2022, January 27). The Putin Doctrine. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/ukraine/2022-01-27/putin-doctrine
  • Sysyn, F. E. (2023, May 11). “The Unpredictable Past”: A Round-table Discussion on Transformations in Ukrainian Studies [Video]. Youtube – Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, 1:05:10-1:26:00. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XI8btnN3B8
  • Toynbee, A. J. (1916). British view of the Ukrainian question, the Ukraine – a problem of nationality. Ukrainian Federation of USA.
  • Tuan, Y. (1991). Language and the Making of Place: A Narrative-Descriptive Approach. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81(4), 684–696.
  • Von Hagen, M. (1995). Does Ukraine Have a History? Slavic Review, 54(3), 658–673.
  • Vorbrugg, A., & Bluwstein, J. (2022). Making sense of (the Russian war in) Ukraine: On the politics of knowledge and expertise. Political Geography, 98, 1–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102700
  • Williams, M. C. (2015) Securitization as political theory: The politics of the extraordinary. International Relations, 29(1), 114–120. DOI: 10.1177/0047117814526606c
  • Yas, O. (2022). Representation of Ukraine as Colony in Ukrainian and Russian Historiography. In S. Velychenko, J. Ruane, & L. Hrynevych (Eds.) Ireland and Ukraine: Studies in Comparative Imperial and National History (pp. 159–176). Ibidem-Verlag.
  • Yekelchyk, S. (2023, May 11). “The Unpredictable Past”: A Round-table Discussion on Transformations in Ukrainian Studies [Video]. Youtube – Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, 1:26:26-1:45:28. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XI8btnN3B8
  • Yurchuk, Y. (2022). War, Solidarity, and Resilience. Some Reflections from Sweden. TOPOS, 2, 42–47. DOI: 10.24412/1815-0047-2022-2-42-47
  • Zayarnyuk, A. (2022). Historians As Enablers? Historiography, Imperialism, and the Legitimization of Russian Aggression. East/West: Journal of Ukrainian Studies, 9(2), 191–212. DOI: 10.21226/ewjus754
  • Zhurzhenko, T. (2021). Fighting Empire, Weaponising Culture: The Conflict with Russia and the Restrictions on Russian Mass Culture in Post-Maidan Ukraine. Europe-Asia Studies, 73(8), 1441–1466. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2021.1944990

Russian colonialism Russo-Ukrainian war Ukrainian studies decolonization Russian aggression knowledge production securitization

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart