Global and Local Conflict Schemas in the Discourse of the Russia-Ukraine War

  • Author: Piotr Cap
  • Institution: University of Łódź (Poland)
  • ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7685-4112
  • Year of publication: 2024
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 205-226
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202451
  • PDF: ppsy/53-4/ppsy2024413.pdf

This paper explores the discourse of the Russia-Ukraine war to outline the dominant narrative schemas anchored in the spatial geopolitical representations of globalness and localness. It uses tools from the domains of critical cognitive discourse studies and narrative research (alternative futures, discourse scenarios, deictic space, proximization) to distinguish between two most salient schemas: the Global Conflict Schema GCS narrative and the Local Conflict Schema LCS narrative. The GCS narrative conceptualizes the Russia-Ukraine war as a growing international conflict, producing serious political, economic and material consequences for the global community. GCS uses coercive rhetoric to call for immediate measures to support Ukraine so the war can be stopped before spreading beyond its current borders. The principal narrator of GCS is Ukraine, though the narrative is recontextualized in other countries located in geographical proximity to the conflict. The LCS narrative, performed mostly by the Kremlin, construes the war as a local conflict providing no reasons for foreign intervention. LCS is distinctive for its large number of sub-narratives appropriated for different geopolitical audiences, which include the Russian and Ukrainian people, and different audience groups in the West and the Global South. The latter groups re-contextualize the LCS narrative, focusing primarily on economic issues.

REFERENCES:

  • Ballestrin, Luciana. 2020. The Global South as a political project. E-International Relations, July 3, 2020, https://www.e-ir.info/2020/07/03/the-global-south-as-a-political-project/
  • Cap, Piotr. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Cap, Piotr. 2017. The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Cap, Piotr. 2021. The Discourse of Conflict and Crisis. Poland’s Political Rhetoric in the European Perspective. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Cap, Piotr (ed.). 2022. Handbook of Political Discourse. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
  • Chilton, Paul. 2014. Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chilton, Paul. 2022. Language and politics, politics and language: Democracy and demagoguery. In P. Cap (ed.) Handbook of Political Discourse, 6-21. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • De Fina, Anna. 2022. Narratives and storytelling processes in the analysis of political discourse. In P. Cap (ed.) Handbook of Political Discourse, 204-218. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Dunmire, Patricia. 2005. Preempting the future: Rhetoric and ideology of the future in political discourse. Discourse & Society 16: 481-513.
  • Dunmire, Patricia. 2011. Projecting the Future through Political Discourse: The Case of the Bush Doctrine. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Filardo Llamas, Laura. 2010. Discourse worlds in Northern Ireland: The legitimisation of the 1998 agreement. In K. Hayward and C. O’Donnell (eds), Political Discourse and Conflict Resolution: Debating Peace in Northern Ireland, 62-76. London: Routledge.
  • Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Hart, Christopher. 2018. ‘Riots engulfed the city’: An experimental study investigating the legitimating effects of fire metaphors in discourses of disorder. Discourse & Society 29: 279-298.
  • Hartwell, Leon, Agnė Rakštytė, Julia Ryng and Ēriks K. Selga. 2022. Winter is coming: The Baltics and the Russia-Ukraine war. LSE IDEAS, December 2022, https://www.lse.ac.uk/ideas/Assets/Documents/ reports/2022-12-05-BalticRussia-FINALweb.pdf
  • Hodges, Adam. 2011. The “War on Terror” Narrative: Discourse and Intertextuality in the Construction and Contestation of Sociopolitical Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hrubec, Marek. 2016. Conflicts of the global state. International Critical Thought 6: 378-392.
  • Hrubec, Marek and Zuzana Uhde. 2019. Global conflicts and local interactions: Contradictions of global capitalism and civil society. Critical Sociology 45: 777-783.
  • Jary, Mark. 2010. Assertion. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Kadera, Kelly M. 2001. The Power-Conflict Story: A Dynamic Model of Interstate Rivalry. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Kundnani, Hans. 2023. The war in Ukraine, democracy, and the Global South: We have a problem. LMC 2023, https://lmc.icds.ee/the-war-in-ukraine-democracy-and-the-global-south-we-have-a-problem/
  • Lenoe, Matthew. 2022. Fact-checking Putin’s claims that Ukraine and Russia are ‘one people’. Rochester University News Center, https://www.rochester.edu/newscenter/ukraine-history-fact-checkingputin-513812/
  • Mann, William and Sandra Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A theory of text organization. Text 8: 243-281.
  • Mercier, Hugo and Dan Sperber. 2017. The Enigma of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Myers, Frank. 1999. Political argumentation and the composite audience: A case study. Quarterly Journal of Speech 85: 55-71.
  • Oddo, John. 2018. The Discourse of Propaganda: Case Studies from the Persian Gulf War and the War on Terror. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Richardson, Glenn W. 2022. Political advertising and election campaigns. In P. Cap (ed.) Handbook of Political Discourse, 288-300. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Ridolfo, Jim and Danielle De Voss. 2009. Composing for recomposition: Rhetorical velocity and delivery. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy 13: 20-35.
  • Silberstein, Sandra. 2004. War of Words. London: Routledge.
  • Tooby, John and Leda Cosmides. 2008. The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones and L. F. Barrett (eds), Handbook of Emotions, 114-137. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Van Dijk, Teun. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Van Eemeren, Frans and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Waller, David and Lynn Nadel (eds). 2013. Handbook of Spatial Cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Zarefsky, David. 2008. Strategic maneuvering in political argumentation. Argumentation 23: 317-330.

spatial representation political narrative Global Conflict Schema GCS Local Conflict Schema LCS Russia-Ukraine war

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart