Liberals Among Us: Socio-Demographic Determinants of Liberal Attitudes in Poland

The authors of this article attempt to describe in detail the determinants and structure of the beliefs and views of Polish society on a liberal to anti-liberal values continuum. The first research objective was to determine the extent of social and economic freedom that respondents expect in their relations with others and in their relations with state institutions. In addition, the authors wanted to identify the socio-demographic characteristics that significantly differentiate these liberal orientations, as well as the factors that independently determine the adoption of liberal views. The detailed hypotheses were verified based on an analysis of data collected in a nationwide telephone survey (CATI) conducted on a representative sample of 1,000 adult Polish citizens. The survey used an original questionnaire consisting of 31 quantitative scales, which were used to construct the Liberalism/Libertarianism Index (LLI) and to categorize respondents into “Polish Liberals” and “Polish Libertarians.” Higher index values indicate stronger and more consistent liberal attitudes in economic as well as axiological (social) terms. More liberal orientations were found to be held by respondents declaring higher incomes, younger, better educated, and less religious, although only age, some party preferences, and religious practices act as independent predictors of LLI.

REFERENCES:

• Barthes, R. (2009). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.; Vintage Classics; Revised edition). Vintage Classics.
• Boaz, D. (1998). Libertarianism: A primer. Free Press.
• Boaz, D., & Kirby, D. (2006). The Libertarian Vote. Policy Analysis, 580, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.975672
• Boaz, D., & Kirby, D. (2010). The Libertarian Vote in the Age of Obama. Policy Analysis, 658, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1543989
• Chandler, R. (1972). Public Opinion: Changing Attitudes on Contemporary Political and Social Issues. R. R. Bowker Co.
• Chmielowski, M. (2015). Agoryzm: Teoria i praktyka. Fundacja Wolności i Przedsiębiorczości.
• Chmielowski, M. (2020). Economic Society in Kraków as Polish Pre-war Pro-Liberty Think Tank. In F. N. Fernández, B. Kolm, & V. Schmid (Eds.), The Indispensability of Freedom: 8th International Conference the Austrian School of Economics in the 21st Century: Papers presented on November 13th and 14th, 2019 (pp. 103–113). Austrian Economics Center and Fundación International Bases.
• Davis, D. W., & Silver, B. D. (2004). Civil Liberties vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00054.x
• Dominiak, Ł. (2017). Libertarianism and Original Appropriation. Historia i polityka, 22(29), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2017.026
• Dominiak, Ł., & Block, W. E. (2017). Libertarian Theory of Bribery and Incitement: A Reformulation. MEST Journal, 5(2), 95–101.
• Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity. Political Psychology, 35(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12055
• Gallup (2002). Which Freedoms Will Americans Trade for Security? https://news.gallup.com/poll/6196/Which-Freedoms-Will-Americans-Trade-Security.aspx
• Gerson, G. (2017). Liberalism: The Life of an Idea. The European Legacy, 22(5), 618–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2017.1304052
• Gibbins, R., Ponting, J. R., & Symons, G. L. (1978). Attitudes and Ideology: Correlates of Liberal Attitudes Towards the Role of Women. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 9(1), 19–40.
• Hankus, P. (2018). Libertarianizm nie jest utopizmem. Dlaczego twierdzenia o utopijności libertarianizmu są fałszywe? Dialogi polityczne, 22, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.12775/DP.2017.001
• Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P., & Haidt, J. (2012). Understanding Libertarian Morality: The Psychological Dispositions of Self-Identified Libertarians. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e42366. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042366
• Juruś, D. (2012). W poszukiwaniu podstaw libertarianizmu: W perspektywie Rothbardowskiej koncepcji własności. Księgarnia Akademicka.
• Kaleta, K. (2016). Libertarian Movement in Poland 1976-1991 in Its International Context. https://kaletakris.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/libertarianism-poland.pdf
• Kaleta, K. (2023). Beyond The Freedom Line: Analysing Libertarian Digital Community in Poland. Manchester Metropolitan University (Unpublished thesis, planned defence Autumn 2023).
• Kiley, J. (2014). In Search of Libertarians. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/shortreads/2014/08/25/in-search-of-libertarians/
• Kłosińska, K. (2012). Etyczny i pragmatyczny: Polskie dyskursy polityczne po 1989 roku. Narodowe Centrum Kultury.
• Maddox, W. S., & Lilie, S. A. (1984). Beyond Liberal and Conservative: Reassessing the Political Spectrum. Cato Institute.
• McCloskey, D. N. (2011). Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World. University of Chicago Press.
• Marzęcki, R. (2008). IV RP i mit liberalizmu – analiza mitów polskiej polityki w świetle koncepcji G. Sorela, R. Girardeta, E. Cassirera i R. Barthesa. In B. Szklarski (Ed.), Mity, symbole i rytuały we współczesnej polityce: Szkice z antropologii polityki (pp. 84–95). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
• Megger, D. (2021). Determinism, Free Will, and the Austrian School of Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 28(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2021.1926528
• Nowakowski, P. (2017). Anarchokapitalizm – ideologia polityczna, doktryna polityczno-prawna czy nurt filozoficzno-polityczny? Societas et Ius, 5, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.12775/SEI.2016.003
• Oakeshott, M. (1999). On History and Other Essays. Liberty Fund.
• Pew Research Center (2017). The Partisan Divide on Political Values Grows Even Wider. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/10/05/the-partisan-divide-on-political-values-grows-even-wider/
• Rogaczewska, K. (2011). Ekonomiczny wymiar polskiego liberalizmu: Od fizjokratyzmu do Szkoły Krakowskiej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
• Sartori, G. (1987). The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Part Two: The Classical Issues. Chatham House Publishers.
• Schreiber, E. M. (1975). The Social Bases of Opinions on Woman’s Role in Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 1(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3340011
• Slenzok, N. (2021). Libertarianism, Property Rights, and the COVID-19 Pandemic Policies. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 25(1), 272–299.
• Slenzok, N. (2022). The Libertarian Argumentation Ethics, the Transcendental Pragmatics of Language, and the Conflict-Freedom Principle. Analiza i Egzystencja, 58(2), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.18276/aie.2022.58-03
• Swedlow, B. (2008). Beyond Liberal and Conservative: Two-Dimensional Conceptions of Ideology and the Structure of Political Attitudes and Values. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(2), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310802075969
• Titlestad, P. J. H. (2010). Liberalism. English Academy Review, 27(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10131752.2010.514989
• Turowski, K., Machaj, M. (2022). The Present State of Austrian School of Economics in Europe. Contributions to Economics. In A. Godart-van der Kroon & J. Salerno (Eds.), The Austrian School of Economics in the 21st Century (pp. 85–115). Springer.
• Wiśniewski, J. B. (2022). The Capital Structure of Libertarian Production. Studia Humana, 11(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2022-0005