Individual Differences and Attitudes towards the Government’s Remembrance Policy

The paper presents results of the experimental study on the government's remembrance policy, attitudes towards it, and the influence of remembrance narratives. It discusses individual differences of participants on three different grounds: (1) interest in history or politics, and level of historical knowledge, (2) features of cognitive motivation measured by the need for closure questionnaire: preference of order, desire for predictability, discomfort with ambiguity, closed-mindedness and decisiveness, and (3) response to the presented narrative, including inspired emotions and an assessment of a story. Collected data and research observations offer an interesting and valuable insight into relationships between various factors and citizen's support for the remembrance policy. They also lead the team to formulate three conclusions which may be used to develop theoretical understandings of this aspect of politics within political science and related disciplines.

References:

• Assmann, J. (2008). Pamięć kulturowa. Pismo, zapamiętywanie i polityczna tożsamość w cywilizacjach starożytnych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
• Boyatzis, R.E., Smith, M.L., Beveridge, 'A.J. (2013). Coaching with Compassion: Inspiring Health, Well–Being, and Development in Organizations.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(2), pp. 153–178.
• Burke, P. J., Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity Theory. Oxford–New York: Oxford Univeristy Press.
• Cialdini, R. (2003). Influence. Science and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Crawford, M. (2006). Commemoration: Where Remembering and Forgetting Meets. In J.A. Parker, M. Crawford, P. Harrison (Eds.), Time and Memory(pp. 225–228). Leiden–Boston: Brill.
• Fredrickson, B. L., Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive Affect and the Complex Dynamics of Human Flourishing. American Psychologist, 60(7), pp. 678–686.
• Hoskins, G. (2007). The Politics of Memory and the World Trade Center Memorial Site. Journal of Social Philosophy, 38(2), pp. 242–254.
• Joule, R.-V., Azadia, T. (2003). Cognitive dissonance, double forced compliance, and commitment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, pp. 565–571.
• Kattago, S. (2001). Ambiguous Memory. The Nazi Past and German National Identity. Westport–London: Praeger.
• Kiesler, C. A. (1971). The psychology of commitment. Experiments linking behavior to belief. New York: Academic Press.
• Kiesler, C. A. (1977). Sequential events in commitment. Journal of Personality, 45(1), pp. 65–78.
• Koczanowicz, L. (1997). Memory of Politics and Politics of Memory. Reflections on the Construction of the Past in Post-Totalitarian Poland. Studies in East European Thought, 49, pp. 259–270.
• Kossowska, M. (2003). Różnice indywidualne w potrzebie poznawczego domknięcia. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 46, pp. 355–375.
• Kossowska, M., Bukowski, M., Czarnek, G. (2014). Two routes to closure: Time pressure and goal activation effects on executive control. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 45(3), pp. 268–274.
• Labanyi, J. (2008). The Politics of Memory in Contemporary Spain. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies, 9(2), pp. 119–125.
• Landau, M. J., Sullivan, D., Greenberg, J. (2009). Evidence That Self-Relevant Motives and Metaphoric Framing Interact to Influence Political and Social Attitudes. Psychological Science, 20, pp. 1421–1427.
• Le Goff, J. (2007). Historia i pamięć. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
• Maruszewski, T. (2001). Psychologia poznania. Sposoby rozumienia siebie i świata. Gdańsk: GWP.
• Misztal, B. A. (2010). Collective Memory in a Global Age. Leaning How and What to Remember. Current Sociology, 58(1), pp. 24–44.
• Singer, J. A., Conway, M.A. (2008). Should we forget forgetting?. Memory Studies, 1(3), pp. 279–285.
• Snyder, C. R. (2000). Genesis: Birth and growth of hope. In C.R. Snyder (Ed.), Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications (pp. 25–57). San Diego: Academic Press.
• Szacka, B. (2003). Historia i pamięć zbiorowa. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 47(4), pp. 3–15.
• Westen, D. (2008). The Political Brain. The role of emotion in deciding the fate of the Nation. New York: Public Affairs.