Author: Małgorzata Madej
Institution: University of Wrocław (Poland)
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5274-8614
Published online: 20 March 2021
Final submission: 14 November 2021
Printed issue: March 2022
Source: Show
Page no: 20
Pages: 133-152
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202213
PDF: ppsy/51/ppsy202213_9.pdf

After the post-communist transition, decentralisation and subsidiarity have become one of Poland's major principles of political organisation. Moreover, especially the original 1990 reform and establishment of self-governing communes are regarded as a success story, not only in improving the quality of governance and public service provision but also in the civil society and citizen participation, as evidenced by the development of modern urban movements. The article explores legal possibilities for further decentralisation of municipalities, analysing the role of ancillary units in regional capitals. Ancillary units in Poland have developed differently in the countryside and urban communes. Relying on publicly available information and data provided by the respective municipal offices, the article describes the ancillary units' statutory role, competencies, and actual activities. The findings enable the assessment of the application of the sublocal decentralisation solution in Polish cities and the identification of its benefits and shortcomings.

REFERENCES:

  • Act on Communal Government. (1990). Journal of Laws 1990, no. 16, item 95, as amended [Polish].
  • al Farid Uddin, K. (2018). Decentralisation and Governance. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer.
  • Augustyniak, M. (2010). Jednostki pomocnicze gminy. Wolters Kluwer.
  • Bahl, R. W. (2013). The Decentralisation of Governance in Metropolitan Areas. In R. W. Bahl, J. F. Linn, & D. L. Wetzel (Eds.), Financing Metropolitan Governments in Developing Countries. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  • Balaguer-Coll, M. T., Prior, D., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2010). Decentralisation and efficiency of local government. Ann Reg Sci, 45, 571–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0286-7
  • Bojanic, A. N. (2018). The Impact of Fiscal Decentralisation on Accountability, Economic Freedom, and Political and Civil Liberties in the Americas. Economies, 6(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6010008
  • Dolnicki, B. (2021). Samorząd terytorialny. Wolters Kluwer.
  • Faguet, J.-P. (2011). Decentralisation and governance. Economic Organisation and Public Policy Discussion Papers, EOPP 027. London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Goel, R., Mazhar, U., Nelson, M. A., & Ram, R. (2017). Different forms of decentralisation and their impact on government performance: Micro-level evidence from 113 countries. Economic Modelling, 62, 171–183.
  • Gómez-Álvarez, D., Rajack, R., López-Moreno, E., & Lanfranchi, G. (2017). Steering the Metropolis Metropolitan Governance for Sustainable Urban Development. Inter-American Development Bank.
  • Governance Overview. World Bank. (n.d.). https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/governance/overview
  • Grävingholt, J. et al. (2006). Strengthening Participation through Decentralisation. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.
  • Izdebski, H. (2015). Samorząd terytorialny. Podstawy ustroju i działalności. Wolters Kluwer.
  • Kingsley, G. T., McNeely, J. B., & Gibson, J. O. (1997). Community Building Coming of Age. Development Training Institute. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/66946/307016-Community-Building.PDF
  • Lazarus, S., Seedat, M., & Naidoo, T. (2017). Community Building: Challenges of Constructing Community. In M. Bond, I. Serrano-García, C. B. Keys, & M. Shinn (Eds.), APA handbook of community psychology: Vol. 2. Methods for community research and action for diverse groups and issues. American Psychological Association.
  • Levitas, A. (2018). Local government reform as state building: What the Polish case says about ‘decentralisation’. Zarządzanie Publiczne / Public Governance, 3(45), 5–25.
  • Loewen, B. (2018). From Decentralisation to Re-Centralization: Tendencies of Regional Policy and Inequalities in Central and Eastern Europe. Administrative Culture, 18(2), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.32994/ac.v18i2.162
  • Longlands, S., & Round, A. (2021). Why Devolution Matters: The Case of Cornwall. Institute for Public Policy Research. https://www.ippr.org/files/2021-03/why-devolution-matters-the-case-of-cornwall-final.pdf
  • Lopatka, R. (2019). Subsidiarity: Bridging the gap between the ideal and reality. European View, 18(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685819838449
  • Lukas, M. (2019). Urban Governance. In A. Orum (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies. Wiley Blackwell.
  • Mukhtar-Landgren, D., Kronsell, A., Voytenko Palgan, Y., & von Wirth T. (2019). Municipalities as enablers in urban experimentation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1672525
  • Mukrimin, M. (2018). Decentralisation and Ethnic Politics: A Reflection of Two Decades of Indonesia's Decentralisation. Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture, 10(2).
  • Olum, Y. (2014). Decentralisation in developing countries: preconditions for successful implementation. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 15. https://doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.v0i0.4061
  • Robinson, M. (2007). Does Decentralisation Improve Equity and Efficiency in Public Service Delivery Provision? IDS Bulletin, 38(1). https://gsdrc.org/document-library/does-decentralisation-improve-equity-and-efficiency-in-public-service-delivery-provision/
  • Saito, F. (2008). Decentralisation and Local Governance: Introduction and Overview. In F. Saito (Ed.), Foundations for Local Governance. Physica-Verlag HD.
  • Samorząd terytorialny w Polsce – JST dataset. http://administracja.mswia.gov.pl/adm/baza-jst/843,Samorzad-terytorialny-w-Polsce.html
  • Skelcher, C., Sullivan, H., & Jeffares, S. (2013). Challenges for Urban Governance. In Hybrid Governance in European Cities. Understanding Governance Series. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314789_1
  • Smoke, P. (2015). Managing Public Sector Decentralization in Developing Countries: Moving Beyond Conventional Recipes. Public Administration and Development, 35, 250–262.
  • Swianiewicz, P., Krukowska, J., Lackowska, M., & Kurniewicz, A. (2013). Błędne rondo marginalizacji? Jednostki pomocnicze samorządu w zarządzaniu dużymi miastami. Elipsa.
  • Sześciło, D. (2019). Polska samorządów. Silna demokracja, skuteczne państwo. Fundacja Batorego. https://www.batory.org.pl/upload/files/Programy%20operacyjne/Masz%20Glos/Polska%20samorzadow.pdf
  • Tomaney, J. (2016). Limits of devolution: Localism, economics and postdemocracy. Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-923X.12280
  • Yusoff, M. A., Sarjoon, A., & Hassan, M. A. (2016). Decentralisation as a tool for ethnic diversity accommodation: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Politics and Law. https://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jpl/article/view/57777

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart