Four Problems of De Facto State Studies: A Central European Perspective

De facto states are entities that resemble normal states, except for one difference: they lack international recognition or enjoy it only to a limited extent. Scott Pegg initiated a scholarly inquiry on these entities in 1998 when he published his seminal book, International Society and the De Facto State. Counting about twenty years after the birth of de facto state studies, scholars have started publishing their reflections on the problems that these studies face and directions for future research. I follow this reflective trend in my essay, drawing on my nearly two-decade-long experience of researching de facto states. More precisely, I discuss four problems of de facto state studies and suggest how they can be solved. These problems are as follows: 1. no consensus on a definition of a de facto state, 2. imperfect existing definitions, 3. insufficient engagement with the non-Western literature, and 4. indifference to other concepts and frameworks when studying de facto states.

REFERENCES:

• Bahcheli, T., Bartmann, B., & Srebrnik, H. (Eds.) (2004). De Facto States: The Quest for Sovereignty. Routledge.
• Broers, L. (2015). Recognising Politics in Unrecognised States: 20 Years of Enquiry into the De Facto States of the South Caucasus. Caucasus Survey, 1(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2013.11417283
• Byman, D., & King, C. (2012). The Mystery of Phantom States. The Washington Quarterly, 35(3), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2012.703580
• Caspersen, N. (2012). Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System. Polity.
• Caspersen, N. (2015). Degrees of Legitimacy: Ensuring Internal and External Support in the Absence of Recognition. Geoforum, 66, 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.10.003
• Comai, G. (2018a). Conceptualising Post-Soviet De Facto States as Small Dependent Jurisdictions. Ethnopolitics, 17(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2017.1393210
• Comai, G. (2018b). Developing a New Research Agenda on Post-Soviet De Facto States. In A. Ferrari & C. Frappi (Eds.), Armenia, Caucaso e Asia Centrale [Armenia, the Caucasus, and Central Asia] (pp. 145–159). Università Ca’ Foscari.
• Dembinska, M., & Campana, A. (2017). Frozen Conflicts and Internal Dynamics of De Facto States: Perspectives and Directions for Research. International Studies Review, 19(2), 254–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix010
• Devyatkov, A., & Kosienkowski, M. (2013). Testing Pluralism: Transnistria in the Light of 2011 Presidential Elections. In M. Kosienkowski (Ed.), Spotkania polsko-mołdawskie: Księga poświęcona pamięci Profesora Janusza Solaka [Polish-Moldovan Encounters: The Commemorative Book for Professor Janusz Solak] (pp. 303–328). Episteme.
• Florea, A. (2014). De Facto States in International Politics (1945–2011): A New Data Set. International Interactions, 40(5), 788–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2014.915543
• Geldenhuys, D. (2009). Contested States in World Politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Griffiths, R. D. (2021). Secessionist Strategy and Tactical Variation in the Pursuit of Independence. Journal of Global Security Studies, 6(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz082
• Hoch, T. (2011). EU Strategy towards Post-Soviet De Facto States. Contemporary European Studies, 2, 69–85.
• Hoch, T. (2020). Independence or Unification with a Patron State? Not Such Dichotomous Ideas as One Would Think: Evidence from South Ossetia. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 12(1), 68–89.
• Hoch, T., & Kopeček, V. (2011). Transforming Identity of Ajarian Population (Why the 1991–2004 Conflict Did Not Assume Armed Character). The Annual of Language & Politics and Politics of Identity, 5, 57–72.
• Hoch, T., & Kopeček, V. (Eds.) (2020). De Facto States in Eurasia. Routledge.
• Hoch, T., Kopeček, V., & Baar, V. (2017). Civil Society and Conflict Transformation in De Facto States. Problems of Post-Communism, 64(6), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2016.1184982
• Hoch, T., & Rudincová, K. (2015). Legitimization of Statehood in De Facto States: A Case Study of Somaliland. Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Geographica, 1, 37–49.
• Isachenko, D. (2012). The Making of Informal States: Statebuilding in Northern Cyprus and Transdniestria. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Johnson, M. C., & Smaker, M. (2014). State Building in De Facto States: Somaliland and Puntland Compared. Africa Today, 60(4), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.2979/africatoday.60.4.3
• Ker-Lindsay, J. (2015). Engagement without Recognition: The Limits of Diplomatic Interaction with Contested States. International Affairs, 91(2), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12234
• Ker-Lindsay, J. (2022). De Facto States in the 21^st Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-635
• Klich, S. (2022). De Facto State Identity and International Legitimation. Routledge.
• Kolstø, P. (2006). The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States. Journal of Peace Research, 43(6), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343306068102
• Kolstø, P., & Paukovic, D. (2013). The Short and Brutish Life of Republika Srpska Krajina: Failure of a De Facto State. Ethnopolitics, 13(4), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2013.864805
• Kopeček, V., Hoch, T., & Baar, V. (2016). Conflict Transformation and Civil Society: The Case of Nagorno-Karabakh. Europe-Asia Studies, 68(3), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2016.1147528
• Kosienkowski, M. (2008). Quasi-państwo w stosunkach międzynarodowych [The Quasi-state in International Relations]. Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations, 38(3–4), 151–162.
• Kosienkowski, M. (2011). The Alliance for European Integration and the Transnistrian Conflict Settlement. Sprawy Narodowościowe – Nationalities Affairs, 38, 23–32.
• Kosienkowski, M. (2012). Continuity and Change in Transnistria’s Foreign Policy after the 2011 Presidential Elections. The Catholic University of Lublin Publishing House.
• Kosienkowski, M. (2013). Is Internationally Recognised Independence the Goal of Quasi-States? The Case of Transnistria. In N. Cwicinskaja & P. Oleksy (Eds.), Moldova: In Search of its Own Place in Europe (pp. 55–65). Epigram.
• Kosienkowski, M. (2015). Ethnic Policy of Moldova. In H. Chałupczak, R. Zenderowski, & W. Baluk (Eds.), Ethnic Policy in Contemporary East Central European Countries (pp. 261–302). Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press.
• Kosienkowski, M. (2017a). The Gagauz Republic: An Autonomism-Driven De Facto State. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 44(3), 292–313. https://doi.org/10.1163/18763324-20171233
• Kosienkowski, M. (2017b). The Gagauz Republic: Internal Dynamics of De Facto Statehood. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio K: Politologia, 24(1), 115–133.
• Kosienkowski, M. (2020). The Patron-Client Relationship between Russia and Transnistria. In T. Hoch & V. Kopeček (Eds.), De Facto States in Eurasia (pp. 183–207). Routledge.
• Kosienkowski, M. (2021a). The Russian World as a Legitimation Strategy Outside Russia: The Case of Gagauzia. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 62(3), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2020.1793682
• Kosienkowski, M. (2021b). The 2006 Sovereignty Referendum in Transnistria: A Device for Electoral Advantage. Ethnopolitics. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2021.1953317
• Kosienkowski, M., Schreiber, W., & Hahn, J. (2015). Social Media in the Service of Territorial Reintegration in the post-Soviet Area. In W. Schreiber & M. Kosienkowski (Eds.), Digital Eastern Europe. The Jan Nowak Jezioranski College of Eastern Europe.
• Kursani, S. (2020, March 31). Empirical-Procedural Applicability of the Contested State, 1945-2017. https://bookdown.org/shpendole/empiricalpa/EmpiricalPA.html
• Kursani, S. (2021). Reconsidering the Contested State in Post-1945 International Relations: An Ontological Approach. International Studies Review, 23(3), 752–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa073
• Levy, J. S. (2008). Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388940701860318
• Marszałek-Kawa, J., & Plecka, D. (Eds.) (2019). The Dictionary of Political Knowledge. Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
• Ó Beacháin, D., Comai, G., & Tsurtsumia-Zurabashvili, A. (2016). The Secret Lives of Unrecognised States: Internal Dynamics, External Relations, and Counter-Recognition Strategies. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 27(3), 440–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2016.1151654
• Palani, K. (2022). Kurdistan’s De Facto Statehood: A New Explanatory Framework. Routledge.
• Pegg, S. (1998). International Society and the De Facto State. Ashgate.
• Pegg, S. (2004). From De Facto States to States-Within-States: Progress, Problems, and Prospects. In P. Kingston & I. Spears (Eds.), States-Within-States: Incipient Political Entities in the Post-Cold War Era (pp. 35–46). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Pegg, S. (2017). Twenty Years of de facto State Studies: Progress, Problems, and Prospects. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-516
• Pegg, S., & Berg, E. (2016). Lost and Found: The WikiLeaks of De Facto State-Great Power Relations. International Studies Perspectives, 17(3), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12078
• Seth, M. J. (2022). Not on the Map: The Peculiar Histories of De Facto States. Lexington Books.
• Spanke, T. (2019). Nurturing Dependence: The Role of Patron States in the State and Institution Building Processes of De Facto States (PhD diss.). The London School of Economics and Political Science.
• Spears, I. (2004). States-Within-States: An Introduction to their Empirical Attributes. In P. Kingston & I. Spears (Eds.), States-Within-States: Incipient Political Entities in the Post-Cold War Era (pp. 15–34). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Toomla, R. (2014). De Facto States in the International System: Conditions for (In-)formal Engagement. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.
• Toomla, R. (2016). Charting Informal Engagement between De Facto States: A Quantitative Analysis. Space and Polity, 20(3), 330–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2016.1243037
• Uyangoda, J. (2011). Government–LTTE Peace Negotiations in 2002–2005 and the Clash of State Formation Projects. In J. Goodhand, J. Spencer, & B. Korf (Eds.), Conflict and Peacebuilding in Sri Lanka: Caught in the Peace Trap? (pp. 16–38). Routledge.
• Von Steinsdorff, S., & Fruhstorfer, A. (2012). Post-Soviet De Facto States in Search of Internal and External Legitimacy: Introduction. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 45(1–2), 117–121.
• Yemelianova, G. M. (2015). Western Academic Discourse on the Post-Soviet De Facto State Phenomenon. Caucasus Survey, 3(3), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2015.1086572