Restrictions of Freedom of Press as an Indicator of Neo-Militant Democracy in Lithuania

For the first time, Karl Loewenstein had used the category of militant democracy concerning the Weimar Republic. Although the world’s situation has changed, the process of political systems taking over non-democratic regimes’ characteristics is still visible. Among the indicators that can testify to becoming militant democracy, the restriction of freedom of the press is distinguished. This article attempts to analyze the dynamics of this process in Lithuania based on the Freedom House reports. The research question formulated is: What restrictions on the press’s freedom in Lithuania occurred in the period? The hypothesis is: In 2008-2019 in Lithuania, there has been a regular restriction on the freedom of the press, which may indicate a progressive process of militant democracy. Results: The hypothesis has been partially verified positively. During the period considered, there were regular restrictions on the freedom of the press but were justified mainly by circumstances, or immediate counter-action was taken.

REFERENCES:

• Bäcker, R., Rak, J. (2019). “Trajektoria trwania opancerzonych demokracji”. Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem, 41(3), 63-82.
• Capoccia, G. (2005). Defending Democracy Reactions to Extremism in Interwar Europe. BaltimoreLondon.
• Freedom House. (2008). “Freedom in the world 2008 - Lithuania”. Retrieved from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/487ca222b.html.
• Freedom House. (2009). “Freedom in the world 2009 - Lithuania”. Retrieved from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4a6452a3c.html.
• Freedom House. (2010). “Freedom in the world 2010 - Lithuania”. Retrieved from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4c23123f28.html.
• Freedom House. (2011). “Freedom in the world 2011 - Lithuania”. Retrieved from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4e1efebc1a.html.
• Freedom House. (2012). “Freedom in the world 2012 - Lithuania”. Retrieved from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/5028efa932.html.
• Freedom House. (2013). “Freedom in the world 2013 - Lithuania”. Retrieved from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/5171048718.html.
• Freedom House. (2014). “Freedom in the world 2014 - Lithuania”. Retrieved from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/53b2b8bb12.html.
• Freedom House. (2015). “Freedom in the world 2015 - Lithuania”. Retrieved from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/55d444e06.html.
• Freedom House. (2016). “Freedom in the world 2016 - Lithuania”. Retrieved from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/57bc4f346.html.
• Freedom House. (2017). “Freedom in the world 2017 - Lithuania”. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/country/lithuania/freedom-world/2017.
• Freedom House. (2018). “Freedom in the world 2018 - Lithuania”. Retrieved from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/5b7bcc6fa.html.
• Freedom House. (2019). “Freedom in the world 2019 - Lithuania”. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/country/lithuania/freedom-world/2019.
• Freedom House. (2020). “Our issues”. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/issues.
• Ijabs, I. (2016). “After the Referendum: Militant Democracy and Nation-Building in Latvia”. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 2(30), 288-314.
• Kirshner, A. (2014). A Theory of Militant Democracy: The Ethics of Combatting Political Extremism. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
• Knoema (2020). “Lithuania - Press freedom index”. Retrieved from: https://knoema.com/atlas/Lithuania/Press-freedom-index.
• Macklem, P. (2006). “Militant Democracy, Legal Pluralism, and the Paradox of Self-determination”. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 3(4), 488-516.
• Mareš, M. (2012). “Czech Militant Democracy in Action: Dissolution of the Workers’ Party and the Wider Context of This Act”. East European Politics and Societies, 33(26), 33-55.
• Marszałek-Kawa, J. (2019). The Institutional Position and Functions of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland after the Accession to the European Union. Odessa: Helvetica Publishing House.
• Müller, J.-W. (2012). “Militant Democracy”. In M. Rosenfeld & A. Sajó (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of
• Comparative Constitutional Law (1119). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0062.
• Rak, J. (2020). “Conceptualizing the Theoretical Category of Neo-militant Democracy: The Case of Hungary”. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 49(2), 61-70.
• Sajó, A. (2005). “From Militant Democracy to the Preventive State”. Cardozo Law, 5(27), 2255-2294.