Executive-legislative interface and functioning of political institutions in Romania

The purpose of this study is to discuss the struggle between the prime minister and the president to exercise legislative and executive power. According to the constitution of Romania, there is a clear division of power between the President and the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister is the head of government but the President also plays a key role in the country. There are many examples of interference in legislative work by the President of Romania. The paper discusses power sharing between the legislative and executive power of the Prime minister and the President of Romania. Because of the semi-presidential system in the country, the President of Romania has equal legislative power as the Prime minister. This has in practice led to major contradictions in the functioning of the Romanian political system. The paper analyses the substantial power that the Constitution vests the President with affects the Prime Minister’s role in the country. That is why Romania’s democratic journey has been one of power struggle between the President and the Prime Minister. Apart from the many conflicts between the President and Prime Minister, there is a massive debate on corruption which has also critically affected institution-building in this new democracy. There are discussions about the pillar of democratic bodies which is fragile and lacks trust in political institutions.

REFERENCES:

• Barbu, D. (2004). Republica absenta: politica ui societate în România postcomunista [The Absent Republic: politics and society in post-communist Romania]. Bucharest: Nemira.
• Bharti, M. S. (2022). Political Institution Building in Post-Communist Romania. Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne, 1, 73–97.
• Bharti, S. S. (2022). Confronting Afghanistan’s Security and Development Challenges: A Contribution of the European Union. Geopolitics Quarterly, 18(4), 51–176.
• Brown, T. L., Wise, Ch. R. (2004). Constitutional Courts and Legislative-Executive Relations: The Case of Ukraine. Political Science Quarterly, 119(1), 143–169.
• Brunclík, M., Kubát, M. (2016). Contradictory Approaches: Discussing Semi-Presidentialism in Central Europe. Annals of the University of Bucharest, Political Science Series, 18(1).
• Carey, H. F. (ed.). (2004). Romania since 1989: politics, economics, and society. Lexington books.
• Cavatorta, F., Elgie, R. (2010). The impact of semi-presidentialism on governance in the Palestinian Authority. Parliamentary Affairs, 63(1), 22–40.
• Constitution of Romania, Art 69(1) of the Law on Local Public Administration No. 215/2001. Retrieved from: http://www.cdep.ro/pls/dic/site.page?den=act2_2&par1=3.
• Constitutional Court of Romania (1992). Law number 47/1992, on the Organizational and Operational of the Constitutional Court. Retrieved from: https://www.ccr.ro/Legea-nr-471992.
• Constitutional Court of Romania, Constitutional Court decisions 375, 601 and 602 in 2005. Retrieved from: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-REF(2012)031-e.
• De Waele, J.-M., Gueorguieva, P., Soare, S. C. (2003). Parlamentele din Europa Centrala si Orientala: Bulgaria, Polonia si Romania. Studia Politica, 3(1), 141–161.
• Dryzek, J. S., Holmes, L. (2004). Post-communist democratization: political discourses across thirteen countries. Cambridge University Press.
• Elgie, R. (2011). Semi-presidentialism: Sub-types and democratic performance. Oxford University Press.
• Florin Bucur Vasilescu, cited in: C. Calinoiu, V. Duculescu, G. Duculescu (2007). Drept Constitutional Comparat [Comparative Constitutional Law], Vol. 1, 4th edition. Bucharest: Lumina Lex Publishing House.
• Government of Romania (2016). Government’s Working Apparatus. Retrieved from: http://gov.ro/en/government/government-s-working-apparatus#null.
• Government of Romania (2016a). Legislative Process. Retrieved from: http://gov.ro/en/government/legislative-process.
• Government of Romania (2016b). Legislative Initiative. Retrieved from: http://gov.ro/en/government/legislative-process/legislative-initiatives.
• Government of Romania (2016). Romanian Government’s Objectives. Retrieved from: http://gov.ro/en/objectives/objectives.
• Ionescu, M., Treptow, K. (1999). Romania and Euro-Atlantic Integration. Iasi-Oxford- Portland: The Center for Romanian Studies.
• Kentish, B. (2016). Romanian President rejects first ever Muslim Prime Minister. Independent, December 27.
• Lijphart, A. (2004). Constitutional design for divided societies. Journal of Democracy, 15(2), 96–109.
• Linz, J. (1997). Introduction: Some Thoughts on Presidentialism in Post-Communist Europe. In: R. Taras (ed.). Post-Communist Presidents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Linz, J. J., Valenzuela, A. (eds.). (1994). The failure of presidential democracy. Vol. 1. JHU Press.
• Marszałek-Kawa, J., Plecka, D. (eds). (2019). The Dictionary of Political Knowledge. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2002). Politica dupa Comunism: structura, culturaui psihologie politica [Politics after Communism: structure, culture and political psychology]. Bucharest: Humanitas, 42–43.
• O’Brennan, J. (2006). The eastern enlargement of the European Union. Routledge.
• Petru, C. (2007). Ce este suspendarea din functie a Presedintelui Romaniei [What is the suspension from office of the Romanian President]. BBC Romania, January 21, 2007.
• Protsyk, O. (2006). Intra-executive competition between president and prime minister: patterns of institutional conflict and cooperation under semi-presidentialism. Political studies, 54(2), 219–244.
• Sartori, G. (2002). Sul Sistema Constituzionale Romeno [On the Romanian Constitutional System]. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 2(1), 9–12.
• Sedelius, T., Mashtaler, O. (2013). Two decades of semi-presidentialism: issues of intraexecutive conflict in Central and Eastern Europe 1991–2011. East European Politics, 29(2), 109–134.
• Shugart, C. (1992). Presidents and assemblies: Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
• The Constitution of Romania (Art. 109 para. 2 of the Constitution). Retrieved from: http://www.cdep.ro/pls/dic/site2015.page?den=act2_2&par1=3#t3c3s0sba109.
• The Constitutional Court of Romania by Decision no 356/2007 published in Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, No.322 from May 14th 2007. Retrieved from: https://www.ccr.ro/decisions/pdf/en/2007/D356_07.pdf.
• The Constitutional Court of Romania, Art. 20 of Law 47/1992 on the organization and functioning of the Constitutional Court. Retrieved from: https://www.ccr.ro/wpcontent/uploads/2020/11/LAW-No47.pdf.
• The Constitutional Court of Romania, Art. 20 of Law 47/1992 on the organization and functioning of the Constitutional Court. Retrieved from: https://www.ccr.ro/wpcontent/uploads/2020/11/LAW-No47.pdf.
• The Constitutional Court’s decision No. 988 of 1st October 2008. Retrieved from: https://www.ccr.ro/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/ROMANIA-eng.pdf.
• Tudorel, T., Marieta (2012). The constitutional court’s relationship to parliament and government, National report prepared for the 15th congress of the conference of European constitutional court of Romania. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/371412190/Journal-2012, 200–203.
• Verga, C. M. (2016). Aspects of the Romanian State practice regarding the President’s relating with the Parliament. Retrieved from: http://www.ugb.ro/Juridica/Issue9EN/6.%20Practica%20romaneasca%20privind%20raporturile%20Presedinte-Parlament.Crina%20Verga.EN.pdf.
• Verga, C. M. (2015). Aspects théoriques et pratiques concernant le référendum en Roumanie. Constitution, démocratie et élections. ïnstitutul European Publishing House, Iasi, 167–168.
• Wolchik, S. L., Curry, J. L. (eds.). (2011). Central and East European politics: From communism to democracy. Rowman & Littlefield.