Author: Krzysztof Malinowski
Institution: Szczecin University
Year of publication: 2014
Source: Show
Pages: 20-34
DOI Address:
PDF: rop/2014/rop201402.pdf

The transformations of the North Atlantic Alliance in the wake of the 9/11 attacks and its mission in Afghanistan have proceeded hand in hand with the redefining of security interests in individual member states. Poland and Germany have also been affected by a polarization of views, particularly on the nature, place and role of NATO in today’s world. The countries’ geopolitics and their varying visions of European security have significantly affected their positions.


  • Busse N., Krieg gegen Russland? Die Nato diskutiert über die Lehren aus dem Georgien- Konflikt, “Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung”, 3.11.2008.
  • Clinton H., Atlantic Council of the United States, “Hillary Clinton: NATO’s Future”, 22.02.2010.
  • Daalder I., A New Alliance for a New Century, “The RUSI Journal” October/November 2010, Vol. 155, No. 5.
  • Daalder I., Goldgeier J., Global NATO, “Foreign Affairs”, Sept.–Oct. 2006.
  • Górka-Winter B., Madej M., Wstęp, in: B. Górka-Winter, M. Madej (eds.), Państwa członkowskie NATO wobec nowej koncepcji strategicznej Sojuszu. Przegląd stanowisk, The Polish Institute for International Affairs 2010.
  • Hecht T., Germany and its American Nukes, American Institute for Contemporary German Studies Johns Hopkins University, 12.09.2012,.
  • Jäger Th., Dylla D., Ballistic Missile Defense und polnische Sicherheitsinteressen, in: Th. Jäger, D. Dylla (eds.), Deutschland und Polen. Die europäische und internationale Politik, Wiesbaden 2008.
  • Jonson P., The debate about Article 5 and its credibility. What is it all about? Research Paper, Research Division – NATO Defense College 2010, Rome, No. 58.
  • Laborie Iglesias M.A., NATO-EU Cooperation in the Atlantic Alliance’s Future Strategic Concept, Real Instituto Elcano, Area: Security and Defense, “ARI” 2010, No. 25.
  • McNamara S., NATO Summit 2010: Time to Turn Words Into Action, Backgrounder. Published by The Heritage Foundation 2010, No. 2498.
  • Noetzel T., Schreer B., Does a multi-tier NATO matter? The Atlantic alliance and the process of strategic change, “International Affairs” 2009, Vol. 85, No. 2.
  • Poland’s Priorities in the Debate on a New Strategic Concept for NATO, “PISM Strategic Files” April 2010, No. 12,.
  • Schreer B., Challenges and prospects for NATO “Complex Operations”, in: Chr. M. Schnaubelt (ed.), Complex Operations: NATO at war and on the margins of war, NATO Defense College “NDC Forum Papers Series”, July 2010.
  • Thränert O., NATO and missile defence: Opportunities and open questions, “CSS Analysis in Security Policy” 2010, No. 86.

Message to:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart