The relevance of the study is determined both by the insufficient study of the diplomatic ceremonials of the USSR, and the fact that knowledge of the laws of their functioning expands our ideas about the cultural component of the life of Soviet society.
Taking into account the absence in Russian historiography of a special study devoted to the problem of the interaction of arts at diplomatic ceremonies, the author set the goal to conduct a comprehensive research of the problem of the interaction of arts in diplomatic ceremonials.
The article considers the stay of the Diplomatic Corps in Moscow from the point of view of the influence of foreign policy priorities on the norms of the diplomatic protocol.
Examples of balls, sports, receptions, organized by the embassies of Germany and Italy, which in the 20–30s played a leading role in the life of the Diplomatic Corps, are given.
The content of concert programs of official foreign visits, which contributed to the creation of a positive image of the country on the world stage, is analyzed.
For the first time the term “diplomatic counterculture” is introduced into scientific circulation – an intentional violation of the diplomatic protocol and diplomatic etiquette in order to achieve a specific result in international communication.
It was revealed that the diplomatic ceremonial in itself is a synthesis of arts – the picturesque design of space, music, choreography, costume.
Already in the first years of Soviet power, symbols of power entered the “struggle for power.” At diplomatic ceremonies this struggle was in the form of a confrontation between European protocol traditions and the rules of the Soviet diplomatic protocol and etiquette newly created by the employees of the Protocol Division of the USSR People’s Commissariat for Foreign Affairs.
Dress code, concert programs, a list of dishes served – everything had to meet the standards of Bolshevik ideology.
Hospitality is an important component of national politics. The Protocol Division, through its work, tried to destroy stereotypes about the USSR as an evil empire. The multinational Soviet culture contributed to the creation of a positive image of the state on the world stage.
- Alyakrinskaya, M.A. (2012). Dance and ideology: foxtrot in Soviet culture of the 19201930s. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University of Culture, no. 3.
- Barkov, V.N. (1939). Diary. Moscow. AFP RF. F. 057. I. 19. F. 113. C. 1. P. 75.
- Barkov, V.N. (1941). Letter to A.Y. Vyshinsky. Moscow. AFP RF. F. 057. I. 21. F. 115. C. 4. P. 23.
- Concert program at the Central House of the Red Army (1945). Moscow. AFP RF. F. 057. I. 25. F. 123. C. 6. P. 84.
- Churchill, W. (1955). World War II. М.,. V. VI. P. 228.
- Florinsky, D.T. (1927). Diary. Moscow. AFP RF. F. 057. I. 7. F. 104. C. 4. P. 16, 23.
- Florinsky, D.T. Diary. Beginning of the 30s. Moscow. AFP RF. F. 057. I. 10. F. 108. C. 1. P. 14.
- Fomin, (1944). Letter to A.Y. Vyshinsky. Moscow. AFP RF. F. 057. I. 24. F. 120. C. 7. P. 33.
- Golubev, A.V. & Nevezhin V.A. (2016). Formation of the image of Soviet Russia in the surrounding world by means of diplomacy. 1920s - first half of the 1940s. М., P. 209.
- Herriot’s visit to Moscow (1922). Moscow. AFP RF. F. 057. I. 1. F. 101. C. 2. P. 14.
- Karahan, (1929). Letter to the People’s Commissar of Education of the RSFSR Bubkov. Moscow. AFP RF. F. 057. I. 9. F. 108. C. 7. P. 6.
- Molochkov, F.F. (1946). Letter to V.M. Molotov. Moscow. AFP RF. F. 057. I. 6. F. 127. C. 8. P. 32.
- Sokolin. Diary. 1928. Moscow. AFP RF. F. 057. I. 8. F. 105. C. 1. P. 128.
- Sokolin. Diary. 1931. Moscow. AFP RF. F. 057. I. 11. F. 109. C. 2. P. 74.
- Sukhodrev V.M. (1999) My tongue is my friend. From Khrushchev to Gorbachev. Memoirs. Мoscow. P. 220.
- The list of gifts to the Princess of Iran A. Pahlavi (1946). Moscow. AFP RF. F. 057. I. 26. F. 127. C. 7. P. 18.
- Reception in the Kremlin (1957). Moscow. AFP RF. F. 057. I. 41. F. 125. C. 15. P. 64.
- Zakharova, O.Y. (2018). How the USSR received distinguished guests. М. P. 495.