Decoding state fragility : Recent trends and developments (2015–2019)
- Institution: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
- ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5384-6884
- Year of publication: 2020
- Source: Show
- Pages: 41-52
- DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/rop2020303
- PDF: rop/13/rop1303.pdf
The article highlights the main developments in the study of state fragility in the period between 2015 and 2019. The goal is to cover the main trends in the study of the subject as well as the most prominent projects of recent years. The article presents the main findings and recommendations of different international agencies, including the reports by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, LSE-Oxford Commission on State Fragility, Growth and Development, United States Institute for Peace Fragility Study Group and the Task Force on Extremism in Fragile States. The article covers the main approaches to state fragility, recent academic novelties and trends in the field. Among these is popularizing the notion of resilience in a set of OECD States of Fragility reports. The fragility trap and regarding state fragility as a syndrome with a set of symptoms is analyzed on the basis of the Commission on State Fragility report. The US agencies’ attitude is also taken into account. The preventive approach towards extremism and fragile states as well as the steps to be taken by different agencies together with international partners are covered in this article. Fragility Study Group, the Task Force on Extremism in Fragile States, and Global Fragility Act are analyzed as interconnected and a part of the same doctrine and political strategy towards the four-S framework implementation. The article acknowledges the continuity in the work of different research groups that culminated in the Global Fragility Act. The need to reconsider previous approaches to the root causes of state fragility is emphasized. The importance of coordinated prevention in fragile states and conflict-affected areas is seen as critical for international security. The article also traces recent adjustments in the attitude toward the main gaps in state functions and the views on the root causes of state fragility and ways to combat the issue and the emerging security, political and economic threats.
REFERENCES:
- Allison, G. (2017). Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s trap. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
- Burns, W.J., Flournoy, M. & Lindborg, M. (2016). Fragile states and the next President: What Washington should do. Foreign Affairs. Downloaded from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2016-09-11/fragile-states-and-next-president
- Buzan, B. (2006). Will the ‘global war on terrorism be the new Cold War?, International Affairs, 82:6, 1101-1118.
- Call, C. (2008). The fallacy of the ‘failed state’. Third World Quarterly, pp. 1491-1507. Carment, D., Prest, S. & Samy, Y. (2010). Security, development and the fragile state. London: Routledge. Collier, P. (2008). The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can
- be done about it. Oxford University Press. Collier, P., & Sambanis, N. (2002). Understanding сivil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution,
- Commission on State Fragility, International Growth and Development. (2018). Escaping the fragility trap. Downloaded from: https://www.theigc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Escaping-the-fragility-trap.pdf
- Fragility Study Group (FSG) (2016). U.S. leadership and the challenge of ‘state fragility’. Fragility Study Group Report. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, September 2016). Downloaded from: https://www.usip.org/publications/2016/09/us-leadership-and-challenge-state-fragility
- Global Fragility Act, H.R.2116, 116th Congress (2019-2020) (2019). Downloaded from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2116/titles
- Grävingholt, J., Ziaja, S. & Kreibaum, M. (2015). Disaggregating state fragility: a method to establish a multidimensional empirical typology. Third World Quarterly, 36:7, 1281-1298.
- Marshall, M., Gurr, T. & Jaggers, K. (2016). POLITY™ IV PROJECT Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2015 Dataset Users’ Manual. 1st ed. Centre for Systemic Peace.
- OECD (2015). States of fragility 2015: Meeting post-2015 ambitions. Paris: OECD Publishing. Downloaded from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264227699-en
- OECD (2015). States of Fragility 2015: Meeting Post-2015 Ambitions, OECD Publishing, Paris. Downloaded from: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264227699-en.
- Pospisil, J., & Kühn, F. (2016). The resilient state: new regulatory modes in international approaches to state building?, Third World Quarterly, 37(1), 1-16.
- Task Force on Extremism in Fragile States. (2018) Beyond the homeland: Protecting America from extremism in fragile states (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, September 2018). Downloaded from: https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/Taskforce-Extremism-Fragile-States-Interim-Report.pdf.
- Task Force on Extremism in Fragile States. (2019) Preventing extremism in fragile states: A new approach. (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, February 2019). Downloaded from: https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/2019-02/preventingextremism-in-fragile-states-a-new-approach.pdf
- UN DESA (2016). The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015, UN, New York. Downloaded from: https://doi.org/10.18356/6cd11401-en.
- UN General Assembly (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 21 October 2015, A/RES/70/1. Downloaded from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html
- United States (2002). The national security strategy of the United States of America. Washington: President of the U.S.
- United States (2010). The national security strategy of the United States of America. Washington: President of the U.S.
- United States. (2017). The national security strategy of the United States of America. Washington: President of the U.S.
- Walt, S. (1991). The renaissance of security studies. International Studies Quarterly, 35, 2, pp. 211-239. Downloaded from: https://doi.org/10.2307/2600471
- World Bank LICUS. Downloaded from: http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/692741468338471327/pdf/892750WP0Harmo00Box385276B00PUBLIC0.pdf
international security prevention fragility trap transnational threats fragile states