International judicial precedent: features, types, significance
- Institution: National University “Odesa Maritime Academy”
- ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0400-2666
- Year of publication: 2022
- Source: Show
- Pages: 26-42
- DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/rop2022302
- PDF: rop/21/rop2102.pdf
The author’s concept of the essence of international judicial precedent is offered, claiming that international courts perform a law-making function. The author is convinced that 1) “jurisprudence constante” (established jurisprudence) is synonymous with judicial precedent; 2) precedent decisions are created by international courts as a consequence of the settlement of similar disputes, the issues of which are either vaguely regulated or not regulated at all by the norms of international law; 3) judicial precedent, as part of an international court decision, should be considered a formal source of international law; 4) judicial precedents should be included in the list of formal sources of international law, which are subsidiary sources. Given the numerous views on the nature, content, legal force of precedent decisions of international courts, it is proposed the definition of judicial precedent, which takes into account the characteristics of modern international relations. An international judicial precedent is a decision that contains legal positions that either clarify the content of the current rule or formulate a new rule. Such decisions shall be considered by the court which made them or by another court (or arbitral tribunal) in considering such a similar case; they are imperatively binding on the dispute parties, as well as politically binding on third actors of international law. The establishment by the court of a rule in the form of a legal position should be considered as a natural process in international law-making. A legal position can exist as a formula, which is initially a mandatory requirement of the motivating part of a court decision, but if such a legal position is repeated in subsequent decisions, it becomes an international custom, in particular, it becomes legally binding for an indefinite number of similar relations, or such a legal position is included in text of an international treaty. As the law-making function of international courts raises questions, there are offered the author’s definitions of “international judicial law-making”, “soft law”, “international judicial precedent”, “precedent of interpretation”, “vertical international judicial precedent”, “horizontal international judicial precedent”.
REFERENCES:
- Alexander, L., Sherwin, E. (2004). Judges as Rulemakers. University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, no.15, рр. 1−35.
- Anakina, T.M. (2008). Sudovyy pretsedent u pravi Yevropeysʹkoho Soyuzu [Judicial Precedent in the European Union Law]. (PhD Thesis). Kharkiv: Yaroslav Mudryi National Law Academy of Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
- Aspremont, J. (2011). Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules. Oxford University Press.
- Buromensky, M.V. (2015). Mizhnarodne pravo na tli vyklykiv ХХI stolittya. [International Law Against the Background of the Challenges of the XXI century]. Proceedings of the Current Issues of Modern International Law. І Kharkiv International Legal Readings, dedicated to in memory of prof. M.V. Yanovsky and V.S. Semenov. (Ukraine, Kharkiv, November 27, 2015). Kharkiv: Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, no. 1, pp. 5−17.
- Butkevych, O.V. (2010). Mizhnarodne pravo ХХI st.: utverdzhennya kontseptsiyi “zhyvoho prava” [International Law of the XXI century: the Adoption of the Concept of “Living Law”]. Almanac of International Law, no. 2, рр. 37−47.
- Butkevych V.G. (2005). Mizhnarodne pravo KHKHI stolittya: poshuk shlyakhiv do universalʹnosti. [International Law of the XXI Century: the Search for Ways to Universality]. Anthology of Ukrainian Legal Thought (ed. Yu. S. Shemshuchenko). Kyiv: “Yurydychna knyha”, no. 10, pp. 831−856.
- Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land. (1907, October). Retrieved from https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/INTRO/195
- Convention on the Continental Shelf. (1958, April). Retrieved from: https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI-4&chapter=21&clang=_en
- Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone. (1958, April). Retrieved from: https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXI-1&chapter=21
- Darcy, Sh. (2014). Judges, Law and War: The Judicial Development of International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Denza, E. (2008). Compromise and Clarity in International Drafting. Drafting Legislation: A Modern Approach (eds. Constantin Stefanou & Helen Xanthaki). London: Ashgate, pp. 231−244.
- Ginsburg, T. (2005). Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking. Journal of International Law, no. 45, рр. 631−674.
- Goldstein, L. F. (2004). From Democracy to Juristocracy. Law & Society Review, no. 38 (3), рр. 611−629.
- Hernández, G.I. (2016) International Judicial Lawmaking. Research Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Lawmaking (eds. C. Brölmann, Y. Radi. Cheltenham). Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 200−221
- III Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. (1949, August). Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocitycrimes/Doc.32_GC-III-EN.pdf
- IV Geneva Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of W ar. (1949, August). Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.33_GC-IV-EN.pdf
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. (1966, December). Retrieved from: https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%20999/volume-999-i-14668-english.pdf
- Jennings, R. (2002). International Courts and International politics. Contemporary Issues in International Law. A Collection of the Josephine Onoh Memorial Lectures (eds. D. Freestone, S. Subedi, S. Davidson). The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 13−28.
- Komarova, T.V. (2018). Sud Yevropeysʹkoho Soyuzu: rozvytok sudovoyi systemy ta praktyky tlumachennya prava YeS [Court of the European Union: Development of the Judicial System and Practice of Interpretation of EU Law]. Kharkiv: “Pravo”.
- Kyivets, O. (2011). Dzherelo mizhnarodnoho prava yak katehoriya pryrodnoho prava [Source of International Law as a Natural Law Category]. Public law, no. 1, рр. 76−81.
- Lauterpacht, H. (1958). The Development of International Law. Stevens & Sons, London. Grotius Classic Reprint Series: Cambridge University Press; Reissue edition.
- Lupu, Y., Voeten, E. (2012). Precedent in International Courts: A Network Analysis of Case Citations by the European Court of Human Rights. British Journal of Political Science, рр. 1−43.
- Marszałek-Kawa, J., Plecka, D., Daśko, N. (ed). (2021). Dictionary of Public Institutions. Odessa: Publishing House “Helvetica”.
- Onishchenko, N. (2016). Do pytannya pro katehoriyu “dzherelo prava”: retrospektyvnyy analiz, dyskusiyi, suchasnyy pohlyad [To A Question of Category «Source of Law»: Retrospective Analysis, Discussions, Modern View]. Law of Ukraine, no. 10, рр. 56−63.
- Panezi, M. (2007). Sources of Law in Transition Re-visiting General Principles of International Law. Anci la Juris, рр. 66−79.
- Tarasov, O.V. (2014). Sub’yekt mizhnarodnoho prava: problemy suchasnoyi teoriyi [Subject of International Law: Problems of Modern Theory]. Kharkiv: “Pravo”.
- UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. (1982, December). Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm.
- United Nations Charter (1945, June). Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text.
- ECtHR. Case of Ilaşcu and others v. Moldova and Russia (Application no. 48787/99). Retrieved from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61886.
- ECtHR. Case of Malhous v. the Czech Republic (Application no. 33071/96). Retrieved from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59590.
- ECtHR. Case of Öcalan v. Turkey (Application no. 46221/99). Retrieved from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022.
- ECtHR. Case of Varnava and others v. Turkey (Application no. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90, 16073/90). Retrieved from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-94162.
- ECtHR. Case of Loizidou v. Turkey (Application no.15318/89). Retrieved from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58201.
- ICC. The Appeals Chamber. Case of the Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, Aimé Kilolo Musamba, Jean-Jacques Mangenda Kabongo, Fifele Babala Wandu, Narcisse Arido. (Case no. ICC-01/05-01/13 A10). (2018, September) entitled “Decision Resentencing Mr Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, Mr Aimé Kilolo Musamba and Mr Jean- Jacques Mangenda Kabongo”. Retrieved from: https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2019_07226.PDF.
- ICTR. The Appeals Chamber. The prosecutor v. Michel Bagaragaza (Case no. ICTR-05- 86-S). Retrieved from: https://unictr.irmct.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-05-86/trial-judgements/en/091117.pdf.
- ICTR. The Appeals Chamber.Aloys Ntabakuze v. The prosecutor (Case no. ICTR-98- 41А-A). Retrieved from: https://unictr.irmct.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-99-46/appeals-chamber-judgements/en/120508.pdf.
- ICTY. Appeals Chamber Case no. IT-94-1 Du [Ko Tadi]. Retrieved from: http://www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/acjug/en/tad-aj990715e.pdf.
- ICTY. Appeals Chamber. Dragoljub Kunarac, Radomir Kovac and Zoran Vukovic. (Case no. ICTR-96-04). Retrieved from: http://www.icty.org/x/cases/kunarac/acjug/en/kun-aj020612e.pdf.
- ICTY. Appeals Chamber.Timomir Bla[ki]. (Case no. IT-95-14). Retrieved from: http://www.icty.org/x/cases/blaskic/acjug/en/bla-aj040729e.pdf.
- ICTY. The Appeals Chamber.. Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlic, Bruno Stojic, Slobodan Praljak, Milivoj Petrovic, Valentin Coric, Berislav Pusic. (Case no. IT-04-74-A.) Retrieved from: https://cld.irmct.org/assets/filings/16-07-18-Decision-on-Croatia-Amicus-Curiae-Application.pdf.
- Appellate body of World Trade Organization report. United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, WT/DS58/AB/R. Retrieved from: https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009DP.aspx?language=E&CatalogueIdList=58544&CurrentCatalogueIdIndex=0&FullTextHash=&HasEnglishRecord=True&HasFrenchRecord=True&HasSpanishRecord=True].
- ICJ. Case concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/caserelated/116/116-20051219-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/70/070-19860627-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/91/091-20070226-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia-Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia) (1996, July). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/91/091-19960711-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/144/144-20120720-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/143/143-20120203-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand). Separate opinion of sir Percy Spender. Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/caserelated/45/045-19610526-JUD-01-04-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Nuclear Tests case (Australia v. France). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/58/058-19741220-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Nuclear Tests case (New Zealand v. France). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/59/059-19741220-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Fisheries case (United Kingdom v. Norway). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/5/005-19511218-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Land, Island and Maritime Frontier dispute (El Salvador/Honduras: Nicaragua intervening). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/75/075-19920911-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Case concerning the Сontinental Shelf (Tunisia/Libyan Arab Jamahiriya). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/63/063-19820224-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Fisheries Jurisdiction case (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. Iceland). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/55/055-19740725-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. North Sea Сontinental Shelf cases (Federal Republic of Germany / Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany/ Netherlands). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/52/052-19690220-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Case concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area (Canada/United States of America). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/67/067-19841012-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/132/132-20090203-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Case concerning Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/120/120-20071008-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Territorial and Maritime dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/124/124-20121119-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ICJ. Case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua). Land Boundary in the Northern Part of Isla Portillos (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua). Retrieved from: https://www.icj-cij.org/files/caserelated/165/165-20170202-ORD-01-00-EN.pdf.
- ITLOS. Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar). Retrieved from: https://www.itlos.org/cases/list-of-cases/case-no-16/.
- ITLOS. Dispute concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire). Retrieved from: https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no.23_merits/C23_Judgment_23.09.2017_corr.pdf.
- PCA. Eritrea/Yemen - Sovereignty and Maritime Delimitation in the Red Sea. Award in the first stage of the proceedings (Territorial sovereignty and scope of the dispute). Retrieved from: https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/517.
- PCA. Eritrea/Yemen - Sovereignty and Maritime Delimitation in the Red Sea. Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Second Stage of the proceedings (Maritime Delimitation). Retrieved from: https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/518.
- ITLOS. The «Monte Confurco» Case (Seychelles v. France). Retrieved from: https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_6/published/C6-J-18_dec_20.pdf.
- ITLOS. The M/V «Virginia G» Case (Panama/Guinea-Bissau). Retrieved from: https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no.19/judgment_published/C19_judgment_14041.pdf.
- ITLOS. The «Juno Trader» Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea_Bissau). Retrieved from: https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_13/13_judgment_181204_en.pdf.
- ITLOS. The «Hoshinmaru» Case (Japan v. Russian Federation). Retrieved from: https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_14/14_judgment_060807_en.pdf.
- ITLOS. The «Camouco» Case (Panama v France). Retrieved from: https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_5/published/C5-J-7_feb_20.pdf.
- ITLOS. The « M/V SAIGA» Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea). Retriev ed from: https://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_1/published/C1-J-4_Dec_97.pdf.
- ECJ. Case C-105/03 Criminal proceedings against Maria Pupino. Retrieved from: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf?text=&docid=59363&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=5135024.
- ECJ. Case C-459/03. Commission v. Ireland. Retrieved from: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_7046/en/.
- ECJ. Case C-216/87. The Queen v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte Jaderow Ltd. Retrieved from: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf?text=&docid=95585&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=9173002.
- ECJ. Case C-120/99. Italian Republic v Council of the European Union. Retrieved from: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf?
- ECJ. Case C-286/90. Case of Poulsen. Retrieved from: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf?text=&docid=97386&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=9173002.
international courts court decision judicial practice established jurisprudence source of international law