Czy istnieją granice dozwolonej krytyki. O relacji kontratypu określonego w art. 41 ustawy – prawo prasowe z kontratypem zapisanym w art. 213 k.k.

  • Author: Paulina Kwiatkowska-Serafin
  • Institution: Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Year of publication: 2016
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 152-163
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tpn2016.2.08
  • PDF: tpn/11/TPN2016208.pdf

Form of an artistic expression, satire has been present in human’s life for ages. It has many varieties and forms. From the very beginning its practitioners have been subjected to the public authorities restrictions and have been getting into trouble with the ones who became objects of the artist projections. In Polish regulation – law, there is a justification of admissible satire, covered by the article 41 of the press law, witch is an extension to the justification of admissible criticism, covered by the article 213 of the polish penal code. However, there is no such thing as justification of art. due to this fact, the artist may be fully liable both for violation of personal rights and the offence of defamation.

artistic expression satire Polish penal code press law defamation wolność ekspresji artystycznej satyra prawo prasowe zniesławienie Kodeks karny

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart