Comparative Discourse Analysis of Moral Dilemmas of Students Attending Hungarian Schools of Three Models

The culture of inquiry in moral thought had already introduced the method of eliciting judgement about images and stories through open-ended questions in the first third of the 20th century. In our research, we investigated the moral reasoning of students. We sought to answer how pupils in public, Catholic, and Waldorf schools judge moral dilemmas in fictional stories. Students’ (N=1144) responses to single-choice selective closed-ended (yes or no?) and open-ended (why?) questions about the reason for their choice were used to judge the decisions of the characters in three realistic, believable, age-appropriate stories. In the first story, taking unlawful advantage was accepted most by public school students and least by Catholic school students. In the second story, the actors’ solution method was rejected mainly by Waldorf students, with social justification. In the third story, there was no significant difference between the perceptions of the school models’ pupils, with a similar pattern of rejection. The results are only valid for Hungary.

REFERENCES:

• Brown, E., Chen, D., Davies, I., Urbina Garcia, A., & Munguia Godinez, I. (2021). Educating young people about society in China, England, Mexico and Spain: similar approaches to values education from different contexts. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 51(4), 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1647513
• Choi, Y.-J., Han, H., Dawson, K. J., Thoma, S. J., & Glenn, A. L. (2019). Measuring moral reasoning using moral dilemmas: evaluating reliability, validity, and differential item functioning of the behavioural defining issues test (bDIT). European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(5), 622–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2019.1614907
• Christner, N., Pletti, C., & Paulus, M. (2022). How does the moral self-concept relate to prosocial behaviour? Investigating the role of emotions and consistency preference. Cognition & Emotion, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2067133
• Conway, P. (2018). The core of morality is the moral self. In K. J. Gray, & J. Graham (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology (pp. 149–164). The Guilford Press.
• Ellemers, N., van der Toorn, J., Paunov, Y., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The Psychology of Morality: A  Review and Analysis of Empirical Studies Published From 1940 Through 2017. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 23(4), 332–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318811759
• Engelmann, N., & Waldmann, M. R. (2022). How to weigh lives. A computational model of moral judgment in multiple-outcome structures. Cognition, 218, 104910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104910
• Evstafeeva, E., & Voronina, N. (2022). Moral self-determination and legal representations of adolescents. In I. Gafurov, & T. Baklashova (Eds.), ARPHA Proceedings, VII International Forum on Teacher Education (pp. 397–405). Pensoft Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3897/ap.5.e0397
• Gawronski, B., Conway, P., Armstrong, J., Friesdorf, R., & Hütter, M. (2018). Effects of incidental emotions on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 18(7), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000399
• Gray, K. J., & Graham, J. (Eds.). (2018). Atlas of moral psychology. The Guilford Press.
• Hyry-Beihammer, E. K., Lassila, E. T., Estola, E., & Uitto, M. (2022). Moral imagination in student teachers’ written stories on an ethical dilemma. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1860013
• Jennings, P. L., Mitchell, M. S., & Hannah, S. T. (2015). The moral self: A review and integration of the literature. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S104–S168. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1919
• Lapsley, D., & Stey, P. C. (2014). Moral self-identity as the aim of education. In L. P. Nucci, T. Krettenauer, & D. Narváez (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook. Handbook of moral and character education (pp. 84–100). Routledge.
• Lind, G. (2019). How to Teach Moral Competence. Logos Verlag Berlin.
• Lo, J. H.-Y., Fu, G., Lee, K., & Cameron, C. A. (2020). Development of moral reasoning in situational and cultural contexts. Journal of Moral Education, 49(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2018.1563881
• McGrath, M. C. (1923). A story of the moral development of children. Psychological Monographs, 32(2), i–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093194
• Metcalfe, J., & Moulin-Stożek, D. (2021). Religious education teachers’ perspectives on character education. British Journal of Religious Education, 43(3), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2020.1713049
• Niedenthal, P. M., & Ric, F. (2017). Psychology of emotion (Second edition / Paula M. Niedenthal and François Ric). Principles of social psychology. Psychology Press.
• Sticker, R. M., Christner, N., Pletti, C., & Paulus, M. (2021). The moral self-concept in preschool children: Its dimensions and relation to prosocial behaviors. Cognitive Development, 58, 101033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101033
• Thornberg,  R., & Oğuz,  E. (2016). Moral and citizenship educational goals in values education: A cross-cultural study of Swedish and Turkish student teachers’ preferences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.002
• Yusoff, N., Shaharum, M. H., & Kueh, Y. C. (2022). Malay Version of Moral Identity Scale: A Cross-Cultural Validation in Malaysian Youth. IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.31436/imjm.v21i1.1981
• Zhou, Z., Shek, D. T. L., Zhu, X., & Lin, L. (2021). The Influence of Moral Character Attributes on Adolescent Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Responsible Behavior. Child Indicators Research, 14(3), 1293–1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-020-09797-7