The Triarchic Psychopathy Domains and Romantic Relationship Quality : The Role of Boldness

The study aimed to investigate associations between psychopathic traits (disinhibition, boldness, and meanness) and indicators of relationship quality (satisfaction, commitment, feelings toward the partner, closeness, and relationship costs) using a variable-centred and a person-centred approach. A total of 1,292 participants completed measures assessing psychopathic traits and relationship quality. Correlation analysis indicated that boldness was positively, while disinhibition and meanness were negatively correlated with relationship quality. Subsequently, cluster analysis was conducted to identify groups of participants with different combinations of psychopathic traits. Three clusters were extracted: “disinhibited”, “callous”, and “brave-resistant”. The last cluster had an elevated level of boldness and was relatively “positive” regarding relationship quality. The results seem congruent with the presumption of a different role of boldness, compared to meanness and disinhibition, in the domain of close relationships.

REFERENCES:

• Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
• Bourbonnais, K., & Durand, G. (2018). Using the Triarchic model of psychopathy to replicate “Greed is good? Student disciplinary choice and self-reported psychopathy.” The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 14(1), 1–7. DOI: 10.20982/tqmp.14.1.r001
• Bronchain, J., Raynal, P., & Chabrol, H. (2020). Heterogeneity of adaptive features among psychopathy variants. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 11(1), 63–68. DOI: 10.1037/per0000366
• Čopková, R., & Šafár, L. (2021). Psychometric Properties of the Slovak Version of Short Dark Triad. European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 11(3), 649–666. DOI: 10.3390/ejihpe11030047
• Du, Y. Y. L., & Templer, K. J. (2022). The Happy Subclinical Psychopath: The Protective Role of Boldness in Successful Psychopathy. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(3), 1143–1168. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-021-00444-8
• Hicks, B. M., & Drislane, L. E. (2018). Variants (“subtypes”) of psychopathy. In Handbook of psychopathy, 2nd ed. (pp. 297–332). The Guilford Press.
• Mejia, C. Y., Donahue, J. J., & Farley, S. D. (2020). Mean, uncommitted, and aggressive: Divergent associations between triarchic psychopathy, elements of love, and caustic relationship behaviors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(4), 1193–1215. DOI: 10.1177/0265407519890414
• Patrick, C., Fowles, D., & Krueger, R. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21(3), 913–938. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000492
• Persson, B. N., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2019). Social status as one key indicator of successful psychopathy: An initial empirical investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 209–217. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.020
• Pilch, I., Lipka, J., & Gnielczyk, J. (2022). When your beloved is a psychopath. Psychopathic traits and social status of men and women’s relationship and sexual satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 184, 111175. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111175
• Pilch, I., Sanecka, E., Hyla, M., & Atłas, K. (2015). Polska adaptacja skali TriPM do badania psychopatii w ujęciu triarchicznym. [The Polish adaptation of the TriPM scale measuring psychopathy]. Psychologia Społeczna [Social Psychology], 10, 435–454. DOI: 10.7366/1896180020153506
• Robertson, E. L., Walker, T. M., & Frick, P. J. (2020). Intimate partner violence perpetration and psychopathy: A comprehensive review. European Psychologist, 25(2), 134–145. DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000397