Social Relations of Urban Children in the Liminal Time of the Pandemic Period

Author: Marzenna Nowicka
Institution: University of Warmia and Mazury, Poland
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0032-9944
Year of publication: 2022
Source: Show
Pages: 34-44
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2022.70.4.03
PDF: tner/202204/tner7003.pdf

This paper analysed the social relations of Polish children during the SARSCoV- 2 pandemic. The period of isolation and remote learning was approached as a transitional time using Victor Turner’s concept of liminality. The concept offered a new perspective on children’s experiences during the regime of health protection constraints and the resulting limitations. The research material was collected using focus group interviews with 41 urban children aged 7 and 9 to describe liminal features of their everyday life and characterise their social interactions. The findings reveal the risks and the potential of the pandemic period with respect to the social world and its construction by children. The most important observation concern is that educators and caregivers exploit children’s aversion to mediated interaction and assistance in reconstructing the world of actual interaction of children using creative rituals within the family and at school.

REFERENCES:

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
  • Fite, K. E., & Garcia, J. L. (2007). A Perspective on Ritual, Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 2(1), 75–84. DOI: 10.1300/J456v02n01_07
  • Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing Qualitative Data. Sage Publications.
  • Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. SAGE Publications.
  • Lorenzi, F., & White, I. (2019). Liminality in education: generating a creative space of encounter and dialogue between teachers and students within educational structures. Pastoral Care in Education, 37(3), 190–207. DOI: 10.1080/02643944.2019.1648538
  • Punch, S. (2002). Research with children. The same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321–341.
  • Quantz R.A, O’Connor, T., & Magolda, P. (2011). Rituals and Students Identity in Education: Ritual Critique for the New Pedagogy. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Thomassen, B. (2009). The uses and meaning of liminality. International Political Anthropology, 2(1), 5–28.
  • Turner, V. (1964). Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites de passage. The Proceedings of the American Ethnological Society 1964. Symposium on New Approaches to the Study of Religion (pp. 4–20). Reprinted in: Lessa, W. A., & Vogt, E. Z. (1979). Reader in Comparative Religion: An Anthropological Approach (4th Edition). Harper & Row.
  • Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Turner, V. (1974). Liminal to liminoid, in play, flow, and ritual: An essay in comparative symbology. Rice Institute Pamphlet – Rice University Studies, 60(3), 53–92.
  • Van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage. Chicago University Press.

liminality pandemic children social relationships rituals

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart