The Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Service-learning in an Advanced Instructional Design and Technology Curricula: Implications for Teaching Professional Courses

This paper reports on the benefits and challenges of integrating service-learning pedagogy into a professional course taught at a US Midwestern university. Data were collected via observations, interviews and analyses of students’ online discussions, written reflections, and project work. Findings revealed that the servicelearning approach improves academic learning, increases motivation to learn and serve, escalates civic values and develops a sense of concern over broader social issues. Most importantly, it prepares students to be civic-minded professionals who are concerned with the betterment of society. Additionally, the authentic and open nature of service-learning was found to contribute to intense group conflicts. Suggestions to eliminate such challenges are also discussed.

REFERENCES:

• Aslanargun, E. (2012). The ethical responsibility of schools: an example of community service in Turkey. The New Educational Review, 29(3), 108–118.
• Astin, A.W., & Sax, L.J. (1998). How undergraduates are affected by service participation. Journal of College Student Development, 39(3), 251–263.
• Bringle, R.G., & Hatcher, J.A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 221–239.
• Buchanan, A.M., Baldwin, S.C., & Rudisill, M.E. (2002). Service learning as scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 28–34.
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis: Sage Publications.
• Eyler, J.S., Giles, D.E., Stenson, C.M., & Gray, C.J. (2001). At a glance: What we know about the effects of service-learning on college students, faculty, institutions and communities, 1993–2000. 3rd ed. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
• Jehn, K.A., & Mannix, E.A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238–251.
• Matthews, C., & Zimmerman, B.B. (1999). Integrating service learning and technical communication: Benefits and challenges. Technical Communication Quarterly, 8(4), 383–404.
• O’Hara, L.S.  (2001). Service-learning: Students’ transformative journey from communication student to civic-minded professional. Southern Communicaton Journal, 66(3), 251–266.
• Peterson, T.H. (2009). Engaged scholarship: Reflections and research on the pedagogy of social change. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(5), 541–552.
• Schine, J. (2001). Beyond test scores and standards: Service, understanding, and citizenship. In: J. Claus & C. Ogden (Eds.), Service learning for youth empowerment and social change (Vol. 5, pp. 9–24). NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
• Wilson, J.R., & Schwier, R.A. (2009). Authenticity in the process of learning about instructional design. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35(2).
• (2009). Analysis of the role of technology in technology-related servicelearning projects and development of the “Technology-Enhanced Service-Learning” (TeSL) framework. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) San Diego, CA.
• (2012). The civic-minded instructional designers framework: An alternative approach to contemporary instructional designers’ education in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 180–190.