Documentation and Management of Conflicts in Science Classrooms: Experience from Nigeria

  • Author: Kunle O. Oloruntegbe
  • Institution: Adekunle Ajasin University, AkungbaAkoko, Ondo State, Nigeria
  • Author: Gazi Mahabubul Alam
  • Institution: Univeristy of Malaysia, University of Malaya
  • Author: Sharifah N.A. Syed Zamri
  • Institution: Univeristy of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Year of publication: 2013
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 86-93
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.13.31.1.07
  • PDF: tner/201301/tner3107.pdf

Issues and controversies are part of student variables and characteristics in science learning. Not many teachers are prepared for the kinds of challenges that are capable of engendering new ideas and innovations when they occur in the science classroom. This study investigated the nature of conflicts that are generated in the science classroom. One hundred and four lessons taught by 15 pre-service science teachers in a few Nigerian secondary schools were analyzed. Fifteen negative conflicts were documented. The analysis of the responses to the questionnaire administered to another sample of 220 in-service science teachers not only confirmed the extent and gave the frequency of occurrences of these negative conflicts, but ranked students’ poor home background the highest cause of them. Good methods of teaching, adequately equipped laboratories, provision of an appropriate stimulating environment and training were ranked highest among the remedial strategies suggested by the respondents in tackling conflicts and controversies in the classrooms. Those useful but predictable findings are part of teachers’ customary narratives. For that reason, this study sought to constitute those surface experiences afresh and at deep level perceptions and resolve the conflicts through engaging students in out-of-school activities like visits to a science museum and community exposure.

REFERENCES:

  • Adigwe, J.C. (2004) School climate and chemistry classroom environment of senior secondary schools. Benin J. of Ed. Stud, 18, 1&2: 83–89.
  • Anderson, C. (1982). The search for school climate: review of research. Rev. of Ed. Res, 52: 365–420.
  • Awotua-Efebo, E.B. (1999). Effective Teaching: Principles and Practice. Nigeria, PortHarcourt, Paragraphics. Pp105–157
  • Braund M. & Reiss M. (2006). Towards a more authentic curriculum: the contribution of out-of-school learning. Int. J. of Sci. Edu, 28, 12, 1373–1388
  • Mendler, A.N. (2001). Connecting with Students. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, USA Alexandria, VA, pp. 23–41
  • Tennbaum, H.R. & Leaper, C. (2003) Parent-child conservations about science: the socialization of gender in equities. Dev. Psy. 39, 1 34–47
  • Tyler RW (1949). Basic Principle of Curriculum and Instruction. USA: University of Chicago Press, pp. 12–15.
  • Utulu, R. (2005). The Influence of Classroom Environment in Learning and Behavior of Nursery School Children.In B.O.Kerr, N.A.Ada. & P. Oriese (eds) New trends in Education; Issues and Challeges; Nigeria, Gboko; Peach Global Publication. pp. 85–94.
  • Wolfram, S. (2005). Measuring Socio-Economic Background of Students and its Effect on Achievement on PISA 2000 and PISA 2003. Being a paper prepared and presented during the Annual Meeting of the Americans Educational Research Association (San Francisco, CA. April 7–11, 2005)

nature of conflicts science classroom classroom management Conflict Resolution

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart