Distance Learning, E-learning and Blended Learning Principles, Problems and Potential

New distance learning technologies are not necessarily better for learning than old methods. Consequently, choice of learning method should be related to course content and students' needs. In this context, a hybrid distance learning model is imperative. This paper is based on the authors' personal and practical teaching experience with distance learning over 30 years, i.e. since 1972. The authors use their knowledge of distance learning and distance learning technologies - combined with their considerable experience of education in different types of higher education institutions - to analyse and reflect on the current vogue of distance learning and elearning. Using an argumentative research approach, the authors draw upon data collected from their personal experiences of distance learning in the UK. In addition, the paper surveys current literature and distance learning activities outside the UK, in particular in the USA.

REFERENCES:

• Barratt, H., 2001: Virtual Universities, British Medical Journal, 8 September, Vol. 323, No. 7312, pp. 580.
• Bentley, R., 2003: Worldwide Universities Network - Online English course prepares students for postgraduate Internet studies, pp. 5, Computer Weekly, London, 13th May.
• Blackboard, Blackboard Content System, Washington: Blackboard Inc. http:// blackboard.com/highered/index.htm
• Berge, Z. L., Muilenburg, L. Y., Van Haneghan, J., 2002:Barriers to distance education and training - survey results, The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp 409- 418.
• Bersin, J., 2004: The blended learning book - best practices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned, New York: Pfeiffer.
• Bollag, B., Overland, M. A., 2001: Developing countries turn to distance education, Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 47, No. 40, pp. 29-31.
• Carr, S., 2001: The high cost of distance education, Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 47, No. 35, pp. 39-41.
• Dibiase, D., 2000: Is distance education a Faustian bargain? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 130-136.
• Delcorde - Jones , D., 2002: The Effect of IT on Management - A Canadian Perspective, PhD Thesis, London South Bank University.
• Fielding, R., 2003: Report slams e-learning hype, pp. 7,18 February, Computing, London.
• Galliers, R. D., 1992: Choosing information research approaches, pp. 144-162. In: Information Systems Research, Galliers, R. D. (Editor), Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.
• Ghazanfar, K., 2001: Could it all end in tears for e-learning, pp. 1, Computer Weekly, 1st October, London.
• Gottschalk, T. H., 2003: Distance Education - An Overview, Engineering Outreach, Idaho: University of Idaho.
• Graves, W. H., 2001: The new challenges of E-learning - Creating mutually beneficial partnerships, ACM Ubiquity, Vol. 1, No. 43, January.
• W.R., Junium.K., Mailhot.M., Tidmarsh, P., 2001:Implementation and Evaluation of a Medical Informatics Distance Education Program, Journal American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 570-584.
• Hentea, M., Shea, M. J., Pennington, L., 2003: A perspective on fulfilling the expectations of distance education, CITC4 '03, pp. 160-167, 16-18 Oct. Lafayette, Indiana, ACM.
• Holmes, W. N., 2001: The myth of the educational computer, IEEE Computer, Vol. 32, No. 9, pp. 36-42.
• Howell, S. L., Williams, P. B., Lindsay, N. K., 2003: An Informed Foundation for Strategic Planning - Thirty-two Trends Affecting Distance Education, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Volume VI, No. 3, State University of West Georgia, Distance Education Centre.
• Jonassen , D. H., 1993: Thinking technology, Educational Technology, January, pp. 35-37.
• Lane, V. P., 1991: A post-graduate training course to prepare doctors for decision making related to computing services in health authorities, Medical Education, May, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 251-257, London.
• Lane, V. P., 1999: Information Systems Projects - Are Successes Congenital or Acquired? In: J. Bryant (Editor) Current Perspectives in Healthcare Computing -Proc. HC'99, held in the Harrogate International Conference Centre, March 1999, pp 156-164, London: British Computer Society.
• Lane, V. P., Hayward, P. Lane, D. C, 2002: The Impact of E-Business Technologies on Healthcare - New Horizons or False Dawns? In: J. Piecha (Editor) Journal of Medical Informatics and Technologies. Vol. 3, IP 15-24, University of Silesia, Dept. of Electronics and Computer Systems.
• Laurillard, D., Preece, J., Shneiderman, B., Neal, L., 1998: Distance learning: is it the end of education as most of us know it? CHI 98 conference summary on Human factors in computing systems, April.
• Marold, K.A. Haga, W, 2003: The emerging profile of the on-line learner - relating course performance with pre-tests, pp. 248-251, IRMA Proceedings, Idea Group Publishing.
• McKimm, J., Jollie, C, Cantillon, P., 2003: ABC of learning and teaching - Web-based learning, British Medical Journal, London, Vol. 326, No. 7394, pp. 870-873, 19 April.
• Moore, M. G., 1994: Administrative barriers to adoption of distance-learning. American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 43-46.
• Nolan, R. L., 1979: Managing the crisis in data processing, Harvard Business Review, pp. 115- 126.
• Ogrinc, G., Splaine, M.E., Foster,T., Regan-Smith, M., Batalden, P., 2003: Exploring and embracing complexity in a distance learning curriculum for physicians, Academic Medicine, Vol. 78, N. 3, pp. 280-285.
• Open University, 2003: The Open University ranked in Top Five for Teaching Quality in UK Universities, http://www3.open.ac.uk/events/3/2003919_32223_ nr.doc, 2003. (Site last visited 1st March 2004).
• Paton, N., 2003: Hard lessons from the big e-learning experiment, The Guardian, 30 August, pp. 20- 21, London.
• Porter, M. E., 1985: Competitive advantage, New York, Free Press,
• Robinson, E., 2002: E-Commerce in distance education, Syllabus, pp. 15-17, February.
• Samuels, M., 2004: E-Learning scheme to undergo review, Computing, pp. 1, 4th March, London.
• Shaffer, D., 2000: Internet-based distance learning: a multi-continental perspective, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 4, December.
• Shih, T.K. ET AL., 2003: A survey of distance education challenges and technologies. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-210, January-March.
• Snaith, J., Lane, V. P., 2003: E-Business and E-Commerce - MBA Unit Guide, Internal Publication, London South Bank University.
• Twigg, C, 2000: Distance education: an oxymoron? ACM Ubiquity, Vol. 1, No. 21, July.
• Valentine, D., 2002: Distance learning - promises, problems and possibilities, On-line Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol. 5, No. 3, State University ofWestGeorgiahttp://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall53/valentine53. html (Site last visited 1st March 2004).
• Villanti, C, 2003: Making the pedagogical case for blended learning, On Campus, American Federation of Teachers, Washington, October http://www.aft.org/pubIications/on_campus/oct03/technology.html (Site last visited 11th July 2004)