Embedded Lifelong Learning: Demands on the Integration of Learning into the Daily Routine

Author: Christian Glahn
Institution: ARC Seibersdorf Research GmbH, research Studios, Austria, Studio eLearning Environments, Austria
Author: Gerhard Gassler
Institution: ARC Seibersdorf Research GmbH, research Studios, Austria, Studio eLearning Environments, Austria
Author: Theo Hug
Institution: ARC Seibersdorf Research GmbH, research Studios, Austria, Studio eLearning Environments, Austria
Year of publication: 2005
Source: Show
Pages: 243-254
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.05.5.1.20
PDF: tner/200501/tner520.pdf

The Research Studio eLearning Environments has developed the “Learning Pulse”. The “Learning Pulse” makes use of a PUSH technology and supports repetitive learning activities by utilizing ICT. The PUSH technology is based on external initiation of a learning activity. This terminology is derived from webapplication programming. This article reflects on the background and the relationship between the “Learning Pulse” and lifelong learning, focusing on aspects of motivation, flexibility, and learner dropouts. In the second part the idea behind the “Learning Pulse” is compared with the settings in which “conventional” self directed learning takes place. Based on these assumptions it is described how the PUSH approach can be used for embedding learning activities into the daily routine of a learner.

REFERENCES:

  • Aggeli A., Vassala P., (2003): Women in Distance Learning: 2nd chance or 3rd shift? In: Conference Proceedings; EDEN 2003 Annual Conference: The Quality Dialog; Integrating quality cultures in flexible, distance and elearning. June 2003; Rhodes, GR; pp. 156–161.
  • Chisholm L., (2004): Getting to work on lifelong learning: policy, practice and partnership. Luxembourg; European Communities, 2004.
  • Doherty P. B., (1998): “Learner control in asynchronous learning environments.” In: ALN Magazine; Vol. 2 (No. 2), October 1998.
  • Dörnyei Z., Ottó I., (1998): “Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation.” In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics. Vol 4; London; Thames Valles University; pp. 43–69.
  • Edelmann W., (2000): Lernpsychologie.Weinheim; Beltz.
  • EUROSTAT (2003): Information society statistics – pocketbook – 2003 edition. Luxenbourg, European Communities.
  • Faßler M., (1996): Mediale Interaktion – Speicherung, Individualität, Öffentlichkeit. Munich.
  • Fox S., (2002): Can e-learning based on computer-mediated communication improve distance education? [Internet] Working Paper; OSCAIL, Dublin City University. [Accessed 29.10.2004]
  • Fretwell D., (2003): Lifelong learning for the knowledge economy: implications for developing economies. In: Conference Proceedings; Policy, Practice and Partnership: getting to wrok on lifelong learning (LLL 2003). June 2003; ; pp. 53–55; pp. 265–271.
  • Fritsch H., (2003): Contrasting distance learning education drop out experience. [Internet] [Accessed 09.08.2004].
  • Fritsch H., (2004): Impact of organizational aspects on drop-out in e-learning and distance education; report of experiences. In: Conference Proceedings; EDEN Workshop 2004. March 2004; Oldenburg, D.
  • Gassler G., Hug T., Glahn C., (2004): Integrated Learning with micro activities during access delays. In: Conference Proceedings; ED-MEDIA 2004; June 2004, Lugano, CH; pp. 3873-3876.
  • Gundavaram S., (1996): CGI Programming on the World Wide Web. Sebastopol/CA; O’Reilly.
  • Heitkämper P., (2000): Die Kunst des erfolgreichen Lernens. Paderborn; Junfermann.
  • Hodges C. B., (2004): “Designing to Motivate: Motivational techniques to incorporate in e-learning experiences.” In: The Journal of Interactive Online Learning; Vol 2(3).
  • Illeris K., (2003a): “Learning changes through life.” In: Lifelong Learning in Europe; Vol 8 (No. 1) May 2003; pp. 51–60.
  • Illeris K., (2003b): “Workplace Learning and Learning Theory.” In: Journal of Workplace Learning; Vol. 15 (No. 4); pp. 167–178.
  • Kallen D., (2002): Lifelong learning revisited. In: Instance D., Schuetze H. G., and Schuller T. eds., (2002): International perspectives on lifelong learning; from recurrent education to the knowledge society. Buckingham; Open University Press; pp. 32–38.
  • Krieger H., (2003): Engagement, time and money. In: Conference Proceedings; Policy, Practice and Partnership: getting to work on lifelong learning (LLL 2003). June 2003; pp. 186–193.
  • Mason R., (2002): Review of E-Learning for Education and Training. In: Conference Proceedings; Networked learning 2002, March 2002; Sheffield; [Internet] [Accessed 29.10.2004].
  • McCall M. W., Lombardo M. M., Morrisson A. M., (1988): Lessons of experience. Lexington; Lexington Press.
  • Mungania P., (2003): The seven e-learning barriers facing employes. Research Report. MASIE Center.
  • O‘Connor C., et al., (2003): Departure, abandonment and dropout of e-learning: dilemma and solutions. Research Report, MASIE Center.
  • OECD (1995): Learning beyond schooling; New forms of supply and new demands. [Report] Paris; OECD.
  • OECD (1997): Lifelong learning for all. Paris; OECD.
  • Sharples M., (2000): “The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning.” In: Computers & Education; Vol 34 (No. 3–4); pp 177–193.
  • Sloboda J., (2001): What is skill and how is it acquired? In: Paechter C., Preedy M., Scott D., Soler J., (eds.), (2001): Knowledge, power and learning. London; SAGE; pp. 98–108.
  • Vavoula G. N., Sharples M., (2001): Studying the Learning Practice: Implications for the Design of a Lifelong Learning Support System. Conference Proceedings; ICALT 2001; August 2001 Madison, USA; pp. 379–380.

micro activities flexibility of learning learner’s motivation information and communication technologies lifelong learning

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart