Exploring Personality Traits and Loneliness in University EFL (English as a Foreign Language) Learners

  • Author: Po-Chi Kao
  • Institution: Chang Gung University, Taiwan
  • Year of publication: 2012
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 236-245
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.12.30.4.19
  • PDF: tner/201204/tner3019.pdf

This study attempts to explore the relationships between personality traits, loneliness, and university students’ EFL (English as a foreign language) achievement. A sample consisting of 137 freshman students from two universities participated in this study. Statistical results showed that conscientiousness was positively related to EFL achievement, while neuroticism was negatively related to EFL achievement. Statistical results also revealed that students who achieved poorer EFL results tended to consider themselves to be lonelier. In addition, loneliness was also found to have significant negative relationships with three personality traits including extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. Taken together, this study would help to contribute to the understanding of personality, loneliness, and EFL achievement in university students.

REFERENCES:

  • Anderson, C.M., & Martin, M.M. (1995). The effects of communication motives, interaction involvement, and loneliness on satisfaction: A model of small groups. Small Group Research, 26: 118–137.
  • Apple, M. T. (2011). The Big Five Personality Traits and Foreign Language Speaking Confidence among Japanese EFL Students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Temple University.
  • Bell, B. (1993). Emotional loneliness and the perceived similarity of one’s ideas and interests. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8: 273–280.
  • Burger, J.M. (1995). Individual differences in preference for solitude. Journal of Research in Personality, 29: 85−108.
  • Chiao, C.P. (2002). An empirical study of the influence of group member personality on leader-member exchange level and organizational citizenship behavior in information systems work groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. School of Business and Technology, Webster University.
  • Ehrman, M.E., & Oxford R. (1995). Cognition plus: correlates of language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 74: 311–327.
  • Eysenck, H.J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6): 667–673.
  • Farina, F. (1993). Introversion-extraversion and EFL Proficiency. Unpublished Master’s thesis, T.T.U., Tehran.
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics: Using SPSS for Windows (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
  • Horowitz, L.M., & French, R.D. (1979). Interpersonal problems of people who describe themselves as lonely. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47: 762−764.
  • John, O.P., Donahue, E.M., & Kentle, R.L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
  • Karami, H. (2001). Extraversion-introversion and grammatical knowledge. Unpublished master’s thesis, T.T.U., Tehran.
  • Lawrence, G. (1992). People types and tiger strips. (2ⁿd ed.) Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type, Inc.
  • Moody, R. (1988). Personality preferences and foreign language learner. The Modern Language Journal, 72(4): 389–410.
  • Mullins, L.C., Johnson, D. P., & Andersson, L. (1989). Loneliness of the elderly: The impact of family and friends. In M. Hojat, & R. Crandell (Eds.), Loneliness (pp. 225–238). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Nurmi, J.E., Toivonen, S., Salmela, K., & Eronen, S. (1996). Optimistic, approachedoriented, and avoidance strategies in social situations: Three studies on loneliness and peer relationships. European Journal of Personality, 10: 201–209.
  • Peplau, L.A., & Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 1−18). New York: Wiley.
  • Pervin, L., & John, O. (2001). Personality: Theory and research (8t ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Rastegar, M. (2002). The effect of self-esteem, extraversion and risk-taking on EFL proficiency of TEFL students. Journal of the Faculty of Letters and Humanities, 10, 9–35.
  • Russell, D., Peplau, L.A., & Cutrona, C.E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39: 472–480.
  • Saklofske, D.H. and Yackulic, R.A. (1989). Personality predictors of loneliness. Personality and Individual Differences, 10: 467–472.
  • Segrin, C. (1993). Social skills deficits and psychosocial problems: antecedent, concomitant, or consequent? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12: 336–353.
  • Stokes, J.P. (1985). The relation of social network and individual difference variables to loneliness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48: 981–990.
  • Vaughn, S., Elbaum, B.E., & Schumm, J.S. (1996). The effects of inclusion on the social functioning of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(6): 598–608.
  • Wolfe, R.N., & Johnson, S.D. (1995). Personality as a predictor of college performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55: 177–185.

EFL achievement foreign language education loneliness personality

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart