Assessment of LMX as Mediator in Procedural Justice – Organizational Citizenship Behavior Relationship

  • Author: Muhammad Ishtiaq Ishaq
  • Institution: Department of Management Sciences, Global Institute, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Author: Nazia Munazer Hussain
  • Institution: Department of Management Sciences, Global Institute, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Author: Muhammad Musarrat Nawaz
  • Institution: University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Author: Ali Ijaz Asim
  • Institution: Global Institute, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Author: Luqman J. Cheema
  • Institution: Global Institute, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Year of publication: 2012
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 202-211
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.12.29.3.17
  • PDF: tner/201203/tner2917.pdf

Scant literature is available on procedural justice – organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) via mediating role of leader-member exchange (LMX) in higher education context especially in Asian countries like Pakistan. For this purpose, data was collected from 452 permanent and contractual teaching faculty serving in different positions at private and public sector degree awarding institutes / universities accredited by the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan. Mediated regression analysis, as proposed by Baron and Kenny (1986), was employed to address the research hypothesis. Results showed that LMX fully mediates the relationship of procedural justice OCB. Implications for future researchers and academic administrators are presented.

REFERENCES:

  • Alexander, S. and Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1(2):177–198.
  • Ambrose, M.L. 2002. Contemporary justice research: A new look at familiar questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1): 803–812.
  • Ambrose, M.L., and Schminke M. (2003). Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2): 295
  • Ambrose, ML, Arnaud, A., Greenberg, J. and Colquitt, J. (2005). Distributive and procedural justice: Construct distinctiveness, construct interdependence, and overall justice. The handbook of organizational justice: 59–84.
  • Baron, R.M., and Kenny D.A. (1986), The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6): 1173.
  • Begum, N. (2005). The relationship between social power and organizational citizenship behavior: The meditational role of procedural justice, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction in context of a private commercial bank in Bangladesh. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Independent University, Bangladesh.
  • Cohen-Charash, Y., and Spector, P.E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2): 278–321.
  • Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E.,  Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O.L.H. and Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 425.
  • Colquitt, J.A., and Greenberg, J. (2003). Organizational justice: A fair assessment of the state of the literature. Organizational behavior: The state of the science 2: 165–210.
  • Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C.A. and Chen, P.Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group & Organization Management, 27(3): 324–351.
  • DeConinck, J., and Bachmann, D. (2005). An analysis of turnover among retail buyers. Journal of Business Research, 58(7): 874–882.
  • Elovainio, M., Van Den Bos, K., Linna, A., Kivimaki, M., Ala-Mursula, L., Pentti, J.  and Vahtera, J. (2005). Combined effects of uncertainty and organizational justice on employee health: testing the uncertainty management model of fairness judgments among Finnish public sector employees. Social Science & Medicine, 61(12): 2501–2512.
  • Graen, G., and Schiemann, W. (1978). Leader member agreement: A vertical dyad linkage approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(2): 206.
  • Graen, G.B., Liden, R.C. and Hoel W. (1982). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6): 868.
  • Graen, G.B., and Scandura T.A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in organizational behavior.
  • Grant, C., Gardner, K., Kajee, F., Moodley, R. and Somaroo S. (2012). Teacher leadership: a survey analysis of KwaZulu-Natal teachers’ perceptions. South African Journal of Education, 30(3).
  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of management, 16(2): 399–432.
  • Greenberg, J. (2004). Stress Fairness to Fare No Stress: Managing Workplace Stress by Promoting Organizational Justice. Organizational Dynamics; Organizational Dynamics.
  • Harris, A., and Lambert, L. (2003). Building leadership capacity for school improvement: Open Univ Pr.
  • Hofmann, D.A., Morgeson, F.P. and Gerras, S.J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1): 170.
  • Hoy, W.K., and Tarter, C.J. (2004). Organizational justice in schools: no justice without trust. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(4): 250–259.
  • Johnson, D.W., R.T. Johnson, LP Nucci, and D. Narvaez. 2008. Social interdependence, moral character and moral education. Handbook of moral and character education: 204–229.
  • Judge, T.A., and Colquitt, J.A. (2004). Organizational justice and stress: the mediating role of work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology; Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3): 395.
  • Kickul, J., Gundry, L.K., and Posig, M. (2005). Does trust matter? The relationship between equity sensitivity and perceived organizational justice. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(3): 205–218.
  • Konovsky, M.A. 2000. Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of management, 26(3):489–511.
  • Lam, S.S.K., Schaubroeck, J., and Aryee S. (2002). Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: a cross national study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1): 1–18.
  • Lapierre, L.M., and Hackett, R.D. (2007). Trait conscientiousness, leader member exchange, job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviour: A test of an integrative model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 80(3): 539–554.
  • Li, A., and Cropanzano, R. (2009). Fairness at the group level: Justice climate and intraunit justice climate. Journal of management, 35(3): 564–599.
  • Martinez-tur, V., Peiro, J.M., Ramos, J. and Moliner, C. (2006). Justice Perceptions as Predictors of Customer Satisfaction: The Impact of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(1): 100–119.
  • McDowall, A., and Fletcher C. (2004). Employee development: an organizational justice perspective. Personnel Review, 33(1): 8–29.
  • Moorman, R.H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6): 845.
  • Moorman, R.H., and Byrne, Z.S. (2005). How does organizational justice affect organizational citizenship behavior. Handbook of organizational justice 12: 355–380.
  • Niehoff , B.P., and Moorman, R.H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management journal: 527–556.
  • Organ, D.W., Podsakoff , P.M. and MacKenzie, S.B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Sanchez, J.I., and Levine, E.L. (2009). What is (or should be) the difference between competency modeling and traditional job analysis? Human resource management review, 19(2): 53–63.
  • Schriesheim, C.A., and Stogdill, R.M. (1975). Differences in Factor Structure Across Three Versions Of The Ohio State Leadership Scales1. Personnel Psychology 28(2): 189–206.
  • Settoon, R.P., Bennett, N. and Liden, R.C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3): 219.
  • Sinclair, A.L. 2003. The effects of justice and cooperation on team effectiveness. Small group research, 34(1): 74–100.
  • Tansky, J.W. (1993). Justice and organizational citizenship behavior: What is the relationship? Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3): 195–207.
  • Tepper, B.J., and Taylor E.C. (2003). Relationships among Supervisors and Subordinates’ Procedural Justice Perceptions and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Academy of Management journal, 46(1): 97–105.
  • Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis: L. Erlbaum Associates.
  • Thurston, P.W., and McNall, L. (2010). Justice perceptions of performance appraisal practices. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(3): 201–228.
  • Van Dyne, L., Graham, J.W., and Dienesch, R.M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management journal: 765–802.

OCB LMX faculty procedural justice Pakistan universities higher education

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart