Institutional forms of support for the intergenerational transmission of traditional skills as an intangible cultural heritage

Intangible cultural heritage includes values and social tradition, customs and practices of human activity. In the context of preserving the intangible cultural heritage, the authors of the article were interested in traditional skills related to woodworking of not only functional but also symbolic importance in different cultures. Due to the risks associated with the disappearance of traditional manufacturing, the authors decided to focus on support programs for local creators and craftsmen. The source of data presented in the article was qualitative research carried out as part of a research and dissemination project implemented under the Science for Society Programme.

REFERENCES:

• Boström, A. & Schmidt-Hertha, B. (2017) Intergenerational Relationships and Lifelong Learning, Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 15(1), 1–3, DOI:10.1080/15 350770.2017.1260408.
• Brockhaus, R. H. (2004). Family business succession: Suggestions for future research. Family Business Review, 17(2), 165–177. Retrieved from https://www. proquest.com/scholarly-journals/family-business-succession-suggestions-future/docview/211110873/se-2.
• Diaz Mendoza, M.A., De La Hoz Franco, E., & Gómez Gómez, J.E., (2023), Technologies for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage—A Systematic Review of the Literature, Sustainability, 15(2), 1059; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021059.
• Holt, R., & Yamauchi, Y. (2023). Ethics, tradition and temporality in craft work: The case of Japanese mingei: JBE. Journal of Business Ethics, 188(4), 827–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05500-2.
• Mandel, B.R., & Lambert, P., D. (2020) International Arts/Cultural Management: Global Perspectives on Strategies, Competencies, and Education. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society. 50(4–)5, 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2020.1771495.
• Pietsch, M., Cramer, C., Brown, C. et al. (2024). Open Innovation in Schools: A New Imperative for Organising Innovation in Education?. Tech Know Learn 29, 1051– 1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09705-2.
• Połeć, W., & Murawska, D. (2021). The Social Constraints on the Preservation and Sustainable Development of Traditional Crafts in a Developed Society. Sustainability, 14(1), 120.
• Rabušicová, M., Kamanová, L. & Pevná, K. (2016). Family Learning Models in Intergenerational Perspective. The New Educational Review, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2016.45.3.05.
• Rojek, M., & Leek, J. (2019). Intergenerational learning in the virtual world. Case of the European community-based educational project. The New Educational Review, 56, 88-100.
• Rondi E., Magrelli V., Debellis F., & De Massis A. (2024). The evolution of craft work in the strategic development of a family enterprise. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1503.
• Schwabsky, N., Erdogan, U., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2020). Predicting school innovation: The role of collective efficacy and academic press mediated by faculty trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(2), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2019-0029.
• Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-000.7
• Smrčka, A. (2022). Wheelwrighting today: transformation and sustainability of the craft in Central Europe (an example of Czechia, Slovakia and Poland). LUD, 106 (1), 233–260.
• Von Suess, R., Grabner, M., Baumann, C., Blasinger, F., Nemestothy, S., Stiefelbauer, C., & Winkler, J. (2020). Woodworking Revisited-Employing State-of-the-Art Video Technologies in Educational Contexts. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 19(2), 52–64.
• Wijaya, P., & Suasih, N. (2023). Determinants of woodcraft family business success. Decision Science Letters, 12(3), 629–638.
• Wilińska, M. (2020). Institutional Life in Making: Methodological Reflections on the Use of Video Recordings in Qualitative Research. Kultura i Edukacja. 2(128), 38–55, DOI: 10.15804/kie.2020.02.03.
• Zbuchea, A. (2022). Traditional Crafts. A Literature Review Focused on Sustainable Development. Culture. Society. Economy. Politics, 2(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.2478/csep-2022-0002.
• Carruthers, M., & Ziolkowski, J.M. (2016), The Medieval Craft of Memory, University Of Pennsylvania Press.
• Nicols, J. (2014), Civic Patronage in the Roman, Brill.
• Perks R., & Thomson A. (2015), The Oral History Reader, Taylor & Francis Ltd.
• Silverman, D. (2015). Interpreting Qualitative Data. SAGE. Publication, London.
• Vincent-Lancrin S., Urgel J., Kar S., & Jacotin G. (2019). Educational Research and Innovation Measuring Innovation in Education 2019 What Has Changed in the Classroom?, OECD Publishing.
• Schulz, R. (1996). Studia z innowatyki pedagogicznej. in Polish (Studies in pedagogical innovation). Wyd. UMK w Toruniu, Toruń.
• Smak, E. (2014). Innowatyka w edukacji. in Polish (Innovation in education), Wyd. Nowik, Opole.