Holistic Approach in Education to Promote Critical Thinking and Creativity

This study explores the impact of a holistic education approach on enhancing critical thinking and creativity among undergraduate students. A within-subject repeated-measures design was employed, with 84 firstyear students enrolled in an Educational Psychology course. The study used two primary assessment tools: The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI) and the Composition Creativity Scale. The CCTDI measured dimensions of critical thinking, including truth-seeking, openmind, analyticity, systematic, inquisitiveness, self-confidence, and cognitive maturity, while the Composition Creativity Scale assessed creativity across fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration, and sensitivity. Paired sample t-tests were used to compare pre-test and post-test results, revealing significant improvements in all dimensions of critical thinking and creativity, except for systematic and cognitive maturity, which showed non-significant changes. Large effect sizes were observed in fluency, flexibility, and originality, demonstrating the effectiveness of the holistic approach in fostering critical thinking and creative abilities. The study highlights the importance of integrating cognitive, emotional, and social development in education to prepare students for the challenges of a rapidly evolving, interconnected world. The findings underscore the need for education systems to adopt holistic, student-centered strategies to cultivate well-rounded, adaptable individuals capable of critical analysis, creative problem-solving, and continuous learning.

REFERENCES:

• Alwagait, E., Shahzad, B., Alim, S. (2015) ‘Impact of social media usage on students’ academic performance in Saudi Arabia’, Computers in Human Behavior, 51, pp. 1092–1097. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.028.
• Cananau, I., Edling, S. & Haglund, B. (2024) ‘Critical thinking in preparation for student teachers’ professional practice: A case study of critical thinking conceptions in policy documents framing teaching placement at a Swedish university’, Teaching and Teacher Education, 153, p. 104–816. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104816.
• Cohen, J. (2013) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
• Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B. & Osher, D. (2019) ‘Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development’, Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), pp. 97–140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.
• Hanushek, E. A. & Woessmann, L. (2008) ‘The Role of Cognitive Skills in Economic Development’, Journal of Economic Literature, 46(3), pp. 607–668. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.3.607.
• Hanushek, E. A., Schwerdt, G., Wiederhold, S. & Woessmann, L. (2015) ‘Returns to skills around the world: Evidence from PIAAC’, European Economic Review, 73, pp. 103–130. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.10.006.
• Heckman, J. J. & Kautz, T. (2012) ‘Hard evidence on soft skills’, Labour Economics, 19(4), pp. 451–464. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.014.
• Lazear, E. P. (2003) ‘Teacher incentives’, Swedish Economic Policy Review, 10(2), pp. 179–214.
• Miller, R. (2000) Education and the soul: Toward a spiritual curriculum. State University of New York Press.
• Nasution, B. N. (2019) ‘Effect of case study and concept map on critical thinking skills and dispositions in Indonesian college students’, The New Educational Review, 55, pp. 64–76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2019.55.1.05.
• Ouyang, F., Wu, M., Zheng, L., Zhang, L. & Jiao, P. (2023) ‘Integration of artificial intelligence performance prediction and learning analytics to improve student learning in online engineering course’, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00372-4.
• Ra, S., Shrestha, U., Khatiwada, S., Yoon, S. W. & Kwon, K. (2019) ‘The rise of technology and impact on skills’, International Journal of Training Research, 17(sup1), pp. 26–40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2019.1629727.
• Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., Lim, W. M., Yang, X. & Khan, Q. R. (2024) ‘Artificial intelligence and social media on academic performance and mental well-being: Student perceptions of positive impact in the age of smart learning’, Heliyon, 10(8). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29523.
• Tsai, C. C. (2016) ‘The relationship between writing performance and creative writing in elementary school students’, Gifted Education Quarterly, 139, pp. 23–33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.6218/GEQ.2016.139.23-33.
• Yu, H. & Guo, Y. (2023) ‘Generative artificial intelligence empowers educational reform: Current status, issues, and prospects’, Frontiers in Education, 8(November 2022), pp. 1–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1183162.
• Zamiri, M. & Esmaeili, A. (2023) ‘Methods and technologies for supporting knowledge sharing within learning communities: A systematic literature review’, Administrative Sciences, 14(1), p. 17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14010017.