The Role of Illustration in Interpreting a Multimodal Literary Text

The objective of the study was to establish the impact of illustration on the reading and interpreting of a poem in the case when only one illustration is provided with the text. The research study involved 408 students of the Faculty of Education and Faculty of Arts. The students were divided into two groups, of which one was given the poem Učenjak (Scholar) written by Niko Grafenauer and illustrated by Lidija Osterc, while the other had the same poem illustrated by Marjan Manček. Both groups had to answer a number of questions regarding personal traits of the literary character, his appearance and the environment he lives in. The results showed that the illustrations had a significant impact on the interpretation of the physical features of the literary character and the environment he is set in. This in turn affected the understanding of the message of the poem.

REFERENCES:

• Felten, P. (2008). Visual Literacy. Change – The magazine of Higher Learning, 40(6): 60 – 64. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.40.6.60–64.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistic using IBM SPSS statistics. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage.
• Grafenauer, N. (1969). Pedenjped [Littleman]. Illustrated by Lidija Osterc. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga.
• Grafenauer, N. (1979). Pedenjped [Littleman]. Illustrated by Marjan Manček. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga (Collection Velike slikanice).
• Hosack, J.K. (2014). Using the Visual Arts for Cross-curricular Teaching and Learning: Imaginative ideas for primary school. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor&Francis Group.
• Krasoń, K. (2017). The Educational Significance of Art – a Report from Experimental Research. The New Educational Review, 50: 159 – 168. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/tner.2017.50.4.13
• Mazepa-Domagała, B. (2017). Profile of Illustration in Children’s Literature Books Based on the Image Preferences of the Youngest Readers. The New Educational Review, 49: 223 – 235. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/tner.2017.49.3.18.
• Nikolajeva, M., Scott, C. (2000). The Dynamic s of Picturebook Communication. Children’s Literature in Education, 31 (4), 225 – 239. Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed March 3, 2018).
• Nodelman, P. (1996). The Pleasures of Children’s Literature (Second Edition). Longman Publishers USA.
• Nodelman, P. (1988). Words about pictures. Athens and London: The University of Georgia Press.
• Serafini, F. (2011). Expanding Perspectives for Comprehending Visual Images in Multimodal Texts. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54 (5): 342 – 350. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.54.5.4
• Sipe, L.R. (1998). How Picture Books Work: A Semiotically Framed Theory of Text-Picture Relationships. Children’s Literature in Education, 29 (2): 97 – 108. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022459009182.
• Vasquez, J.A., Troutman, F., Comer, M.W. (2010). Developing Visual Literacy in Science, K-8. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press, National Science Teachers Association. Available at eBook Academic Collection Trail (accessed 8 April 2014).