Systematicity in Foreign Language Classroom Communication
- Institution: University of Primorska
- Institution: University of Primorska
- Year of publication: 2018
- Source: Show
- Pages: 71-84
- DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2018.53.3.06
- PDF: tner/201803/tner5306.pdf
The paper discusses the intrinsic potential offered by classroom interaction for language development. The first part examines several theoretical aspects and characteristics of classroom communication. The second part presents the results of a study which investigates different aspects of classroom interaction in foreign language teaching and the strategies used to encourage classroom communication in the target language. The study, which combines quantitative and qualitative research methods, is based on a survey of Slovene teachers teaching English in primary school. Results suggest that while the respondents are well aware of the benefits of using English in classroom communication, they generally use it in an arbitrary and unsystematic fashion. We would like to argue that we can contribute to the effectiveness of the teaching process by approaching classroom communication with a systematic and consistent format.
REFERENCES:
- Behnam, B. & Pouriran Y. (2009). Classroom discourse: Analyzing teacher/learner interactions in Iranian EFL task-based classrooms. Porta Linguarum, 2: 117 – 132.
- Brumen, M., & Fojkar, M.D. (2012). Teacher development in Slovenia for teaching foreign languages at the primary level. CEPS Journal: Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 2(3), 27.
- Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Christie, F. (2005). Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Functional Perspective. London: Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.
- Cullen, R. (2002). Supportive teacher talk: the importance of the F-move. ELT Journal, 56(2), 117– 127.
- Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, MA: Oxford University Press.
- Garton, S. (2012). Speaking out of turn? Taking the initiative in teacher-fronted classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 3(1), 29 – 45.
- Gil, G. (2002). Two complementary modes of foreign language classroom interaction. ELT Journal, 56(3), 273– 279.
- Hughes, G.S. (1981). A Handbook of Classroom English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lightbown, P. and Spada N. (2006). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Mahasneh, A.M. and Musslim, F.Y. & Shammout, N.A. (2016). Student Perceptions of Science Teacher Communication Behavior in Jordan. The New Education Review, 45(3), 210 – 222.
- Pižorn, K., & Fojkar, M.D. (2013). Parents and Educational Change - the Need for Reculturing Parents in Lowering the Starting Age of Foreign Language Learning. The New Education Review, 34(4), 63 – 73.
- Scott, W. A. and Ytreberg, L.H. (1994). Teaching English to Children. New York: Longman Inc.
- Seedhouse, P. (1996). Classroom interaction: possibilities and impossibilities. ELT Journal, 50(1), 16– 24.
- Walsh, S. (2006a). Talking the talk of the TESOL classroom. ELT Journal, 60(2), 133 – 141.
- Walsh, S. (2006b). Investigating Classroom Discourse. London and New York: Routledge.
classroom interaction English as a foreign language primary education routine classroom communication