Teachers and their Habitus -a few Reflections on Educational Activity

In the study, the author refers to R. Kwaśnica’s concept of two rationalities and to P. Bourdieu’s constructivist structuralism. She assumes that the teacher’s activity takes place within the limits of two (adaptive and emancipatory) rationalities in a specific “field”, with a particular social, cultural and human capital, and with a developed habitus which determines educational practice. A research report is presented. This is done in the form of a record of the current state and socio-civilizational changes which have influenced teachers working in the southern part of the Polish-Czech borderland. Research results show both the continuity and change of the teacher’s behavior and activity from the perspective of social time and social change. They allow for a closer insight into the structure of pedagogical activities and their effects. The strategy of lon- gitudinal comparisons was applied. Diagnostic polling and the interview were used along with the (repeatable) panel method. The studies were conducted in time spans (1998, 2008, 2016) and they concerned the measurement of the teacher’s perception of the “other” learner in class, self-reflection upon the role applied by the teacher, and the teacher’s competences. The obtained research results allow for discovering the characteristics of the teacher’s habitus, for understanding the mechanisms of its functioning and for the effective design of educational activity.

REFERENCES:

• Bourdieu P. (1977). Outline of a Th eory of Practice. Cambridge: University Press.
• Bourdieu P., Wacquant L.J.D. (1996). Refl eksiv sociologi. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
• Bourdieu P. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris: Seuil.
• Ferguson G.A., Takane Y. (1989). Statistical analysis in psychology and education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Frankfort-Nachmias Ch., Nachmias D. (1996): Research Methods in the Social Sciences. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
• Golka L. (2016). Uwagi o „efekcie” pogranicza. [Remarks on the borderland ”eff ect”]. in: J. Miluska (ed.): Psychologia społeczno-kulturowego pogranicza. Wstęp do koncepcji i badań. [Psychology of the sociocultural borderland] Szczecin: WN Minerwa, p. 15.
• Kwaśnica R. (2007). Dwie racjonalności. Od fi lozofi i sensu ku pedagogice ogólnej. [Two rationalities. From philosophy of sense towards general pedagogy]. Wrocław: WN DSWE TWP we Wrocławiu.
• Lewicka M., Trzebiński J. (eds) (1985). Psychologia spostrzegania społecznego. [Psychology of social perception]. Warszawa: KiW, pp. 107, 108.
• Szczurek-Boruta A. (2014). Intercultural Education in Cieszyn Silesia. ‘American Journal of Educational Research’, Vol. 2, No. 3, 154 – 158. © Science and Education Publishing DOI:10.12691/education-2 – 3-8. ISSN (Online): 2327 – 6150.