The Gender Diverse and the Genderless Conceptions of Marriage and Children’s Right to Develop Their Sexual Identity

The article is a philosophical analysis of the meaning structure of two competing conceptions of marriage with regard to children’s right to develop their sexual identity. These two conceptions of marriage make different metaphysical assumptions about human nature, which lead to different conceptions about the preconditions of children’s sexual development. The gender diverse conception assumes that human beings are born with a biological sex and they can be integrated persons only when living in terms with it. In order to develop their sexual identity they benefit from male-female interaction within the nuclear family. The genderless conception assumes that children are free to construct their sexual identity according to their inner experience and the main precondition for such an authentic development is an environment free of sexual stereotypes.

REFERENCES:

• Allen, Doug (2015) More Heat than Light: A Critical Assessment of the Same-Sex Parent ing Literature, 1995−2013, Marriage & Family Review, 51:2, 154−182.
• Bakhtin, Mikhail (1984). Problems in Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Transl. and ed. by Caryl Emer son. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
• Doherty, William & Craft, Shonda (2013). Single Mothers Raising Children Without Fathers. In W. Bradford Wilcox & Kathleen Kovner Kline (Eds.) Gender and Parenthood: Biological and Social Scientific Perspectives. New York: Columbia University Press, 304-321.
• Gallagher, Maggie (2012). The Case Against Same-Sex Marriage. In John Corvino & Maggie Gallagher: Debating Same-Sex Marriage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Halzman, Scott (2013). The Effect of Gender-Based Parental Influences on Raising Children. In: W. Bradford Wilcox & Kathleen Kovner Kline (Eds.) Gender and Parenthood: Biological and Social Scientific Perspectives. New York: Columbia University Press, 304-321.
• Heinämaa, Sara (1996). Ele, tyyli ja sukupuoli. (Gesture, Style and Gender) Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
• Hite, Share (1994). The Hite Report on the Family: Growing up under Patriarchy. New York: Grove Press.
• Kekäle, Jari (2007), Postmoderni isyys ja uskonnollisuus. (Postmodern Fatherhood and Religiosity). Joensuun Yliopiston teologisia julkaisuja 19.
• Milbank, John (2012). Gay marriage and the future of human sexuality. ABC Religion and Ethics 13 March 2012.
• Palkoviz, Rob (2013). Gendered Parenting’s Implications for Children’s Well-Being. In W. Bradford Wilcox & Kathleen Kovner Kline (Eds.) Gender and Parenthood: Biological and Social Scientific Perspectives. New York: Columbia University Press, 215-248.
• Rosenblum, Darren (2012) “Unsex Mothering: Toward a New Culture of Parenting,” Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 35.
• Sandel, Michael J. (2010) Justice: What’s the Right Thing to do? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Scruton, Roger (2006) Sexual Desire. A Philosophical Investigation. London: Continuum.
• Silverstein, Louise B. & Auerbach, Carl F. (1999). Deconstructing the Essential Father. American Psychologist 54 (6), June 1999, 397−407.
• Stacey, Judith & Biblarz, Timothy (2001). (How) does the sexual orientation of parents matter? American Sociological Review 66, 159−183.
• Witt, Charlotte (2011). The Metaphysics of Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.