Author: Andrés J. Muñoz-Mohedano
Author: Miguel A. Martin-Sanchez
Year of publication: 2016
Source: Show
Pages: 137-145
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2016.43.1.11
PDF: tner/201601/tner20160111.pdf

The paper tries to be a  critical analysis of and a  theoretical reflection on minority students: gifted children in the Spanish education system. To carry out this study and achieve the objectives set up, we took into account a qualitative methodology, framed within the constructivist paradigm in the social sciences. Being a gifted child in Spain is a problem because gifted children are not being adequately addressed, as the Ministry of Education recognizes. An objective analysis of the current situation can become a way of changing it. In addition, we have to pay attention to the principles and rights of the awareness of diversity.

REFERENCES:

  • Arnove, R. (2009). World-systems analysis and comparative education in the age of globalization. International Handbook of Comparative Education. Cowen, R. & Kazamias, A. (ed.). New York: Springer.
  • Cardoso, C. (2000). Introducción al trabajo de la investigación histórica (Introduction to the work of historical research). Barcelona: Crítica.
  • Carnoy, M., & Rhoten, D. (2002). What does globalization mean for educational change? A comparative approach. Comparative education review, 46 (1), 1-9.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
  • De Mirandés I Grabalosa, J. (2008). La educación de los más inteligentes (The education of the smartest) Madrid: Temas de Hoy.
  • Fernández, M. (2006). Características socioemocionales de los adolescentes superdotados (Socio-emotional characteristics of gifted adolescents) PhD thesis, University of Comillas. Spain.
  • Ferraz, M. (2012). From the official pedagogy to the critical pedagogy. A reflexive attempt for redefining the profile of its object of study. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 58 (4).
  • Fuller, B. (2004). Local meanings, global schooling: Anthropology and world culture theory. Comparative Education Review, 48, 337-330
  • García, W. & Martín-Sánchez, M. (2013). Hermeneutics and pedagogy: educational practice in the speech about Education. Pulso. Revista de Educación, 36, 55-78.
  • García, J. (2009). Hacia el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. El reto de la adaptación de la diversidad a Bolonia (Towards the European Higher Education Area. The challenge of adapting to diversity Bologna). Coruña: NETBIBLO.
  • García, M.J. (2012). The postmodern university and the new knowledge production. Educación XX1, 15 (1).
  • Gil, F. (2011). Education with theory. A pedagogical review of the theory-practice relationships in education. Teoría de la Educación, 23 (1), 19-43.
  • Granado M.C. (2005). El niño superdotado. Fundamentos Teóricos y Psicoeducativos (The gifted child. Theoretical and Psycho-educational foundations). Badajoz: Abecedario.
  • Law 14/1970 General Education. Spanish Official State Gazette (BOE) 6/08/1970.
  • Law 10/2002 of Quality of Education. BOE 24/12/2002.
  • Law 2/2006 of Education. BOE 4/05/2006.
  • Law 8/2013 General Education. BOE 10/12/2013.
  • Martín-Sánchez, M. (2014). Teacher training in the postmodern era. Revista de Educación, (7), 75-92.
  • Ministry of Education (MEC). 2012. Education Statistics in Spain 2009-2010. Madrid: Secretaría General Técnica.
  • MEC. 2015. Education Statistics in Spain 2013-2014. Madrid: Secretaría General Técnica.
  • MEC 2012. Report on the status and situation of the education system 2009-2010. Madrid: Secretaría General Técnica.
  • Pallarés, M. (2013). Advertising as a school learning tool. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 61 (1)
  • Pallarés, M. (2014). Paulo Freire’s legacy in today’s school. From the critical literacy to literacy in the media. Teoría de la Educación, 26 (1), 59-76.
  • Peña, J., & Calzadilla, R. (2006). The qualitative thing of the pedagogical speech in the dialecticone. Sapiens. Revista Universitaria de Investigación, 7 (1), 181-202.
  • Pernas, C. (2009). Attention to diversity in schools. Zona Próxima. Revista del Instituto de Estudios en Educación Universidad del Norte, 11, 160-169
  • Romero, J. (2002). Basic education budgets historical research XXI. Revista de Educación (4), 203-216.
  • Ruíz, J. (1976). The historical method in historical research of Education. Revista Española de Pedagogia, 134, 449-475.
  • Salaburu, P. (2011). España y el proceso de Bolonia. Un encuentro imprescindible (Spain and the Bologna process. An essential meeting). Madrid: Academia Europea de Ciencias y Artes.
  • Sánchez, A. & Pulido, R. (2007). El centro educativo: Una organización de y para la diversidad (The school: an organization of and for diversity). Granada: Grupo Editorial Universitario.
  • Sánchez, E. & López, J. (2012). The creative language in the gifted child. Iberoamerican Congress of Languages in Education and Culture. Salamanca, Spain.
  • Spanish Constitution 1978. BOE 29/12/1978.
  • United Nations. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1966. BOE 30/04/1977.
  • Welch, A.R. (2001). Globalisation, post-modernity and the state: Comparative education facing the third millennium. Comparative Education, 37 (4), 475-492.

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart