Collective biography writing-theoretical foundations, methods and outline of the research procedure

Author: Zuzanna Zbróg
Year of publication: 2016
Source: Show
Pages: 287-294
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2016.43.1.24
PDF: tner/201601/tner20160124.pdf

The article describes the innovative method of qualitative research, Collective Biography Writing (CBW), which is not well known or not known at all in the pedagogical research of the region of Central and Eastern Europe. This method is especially useful in the re-exploration of issues connected with being, becoming, development, and learning in the context of education and pedagogical research. The article presents the theoretical foundations of the CBW method and its basis in the notions of being as emergent within the encounter, intra-action, entanglement of agencies, and the significance of matter. An outline of the scientific procedure is also presented.

REFERENCES:

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.
  • Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2006a) (eds.) Doing collective biography. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
  • Davies B., Gannon S. (2006b) Constituting the feminist subject in post-structuralist discourse. In: B. Davies, S. Gannon (eds.). Doing collective biography (pp. 167-181). Maidenhead: McGraw Hiil Education, Open University Press, pp. 167-181.
  • Davies, B. & Gannon, S. (2009) (eds.). Pedagogical encounters. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Davies, B. & Gannon, S. (2012). Collective Biography and the Entangled Enlivening of Being, International Review of Qualitative Research, Volume 5, Number 4, pp. 357-376.
  • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Haug, F. et al. (1987). Female sexualization: A collective work of memory. London: Verso Press.
  • Onyx J., Small J. (2001). Memory-Work: The Method, Qualitative Inquiry, Volume 7 Number 6, pp. 773-786.
  • Szahaj A. (1993), Teksty na wolności (strukturalizm-poststrukturalizm-postmodernizm). Kultura Współczesna, no. 2, pp. 5-13.
  • M. Wihlborg (2015), An Awareness of the Feminist Subject: An Example of Collective Biography Writing in Poststructuralist Discourse Practice, In:P. Smeyers, D. Bridges, N.C. Burbules, M. Griffiths (eds.), International Handbook of Interpretation in Educational Research. Springer: Dordrecht-Heidelberg-New York-London, pp. 257-280.
  • Witkowski L. (2007). Edukacja wobec sporów o (po)nowoczesność. Warszawa: IBE.

qualitative research Collective Biography Writing educational research

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart