Motivation for participation in competition and avoidance of competition: the role of the accuracy of comparative self-evaluations of academic performance

  • Author: Damjan Šimek
  • Author: Katja Košir
  • Year of publication: 2015
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 142-152
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2015.39.1.12
  • PDF: tner/201501/tner20150112.pdf

To investigate the role of academic achievement in the reasons for participation in and/or avoidance of competition more clearly, the presented research was aimed at assessing the role of the discrepancy between objective evaluations and subjective self-evaluations of academic performance in secondary school students. The differences between under-raters, accurate raters, and over-raters in their reasons for participation in and/or avoidance of competition were investigated. The study comprised 534 secondary school students. The results do not clearly indicate possible benefits of the positive bias; we found that under-rating may have some advantages in the sense of mastery orientation and self-improvement motives (upward comparison) in competitive situations. Concerning other reasons for participation in competition, as well as reasons for avoiding it, students were found to rely more on teachers’ objective measure of academic performance than on the (in)accurate aspect of social comparison information.

REFERENCES:

  • Blanton, H., Buunk, B.P., Gibbons, F.X., & Kuyper, H. (1999). When better-thanothers compare upward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 420−430.
  • Deutsch, M. (1990). Forms of social organization: Psychological consequences. In: H.T. Himmelweit & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Societal Psychology (pp. 157-176). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Dijkstra, P., Kuyper, H., van der Werf, G., Buunk, A., & van der Zee, I.G. (2008). Social Comparison in the classroom: A review. Review of Educational Research, 78, 828−879.
  • Dupeyrat, C., Escribe, C., Huet, N., & Régner, I. (2011). Positive biases in selfassessment of mathematics competence, achievement goals, and mathematics performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 241-250.
  • Fülöp, M. (1992). Cognitive concepts on competition. International Journal of Psychology, 27, 316-322.
  • Franken, R.E., & Brown, D.J. (1995). Why do people like competition? Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 175-184.
  • Franken, R.E., & Prpich, W. (1996). Dislike of competition and the need to win. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 695-712.
  • Gonida, E.N., & Leondari, A. (2011). Patterns of motivation among adolescents with biased and accurate self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 209−220.
  • Gramzow, R., H., Elliot, A., J., Asher, E., & McGregor, H.A. (2003). Self-evaluation bias and academic performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 41−61.
  • Klassen, R.M. (2007). Using predictions to learn about the self-efficacy of early adolescents with and without learning disabilities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 173-187.
  • Kuyper, H., Dijkstra, P., Buunk, A.P., & van der Werf, M.P.C. (2011). Social comparisons in the classroom. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 25−53.
  • Pintrich, P.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In: V M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 452-502). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Ryckman, R.M., Hammer, M., Kaczor, L.M., & Gold, J.A. (1990). Construction of a hypercompetitive attitude scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 630-639.
  • Ryckman, R.M., Hammer, M., Kaczor, L.M. & Gold, J.A. (1996). Construction of a personal development competitive attitude scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 374-386.
  • Ryckman, R.M., Thornton, B., Gold, J.A., & Collier, S. (2011). Considering Competition avoidant individuals via the Big Five Model. Current Research in Psychology, 2, 108-114.
  • Šimek, D. (2008). The role of the motivation for education and competitiveness in self-handicapping strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University in Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts.
  • Šimek, D., & Kobal Grum, D. (2011). Competitiveness and motivation for education in self-handicapping. Studia Psychologica, 53, 83-96.
  • Thornton, B., Ryckman, R.M. & Gold, J.A. (2011). Competitive orientations and the Type A Behavior Pattern. Psychology, 5, 411-415.

academic achievement comparative self-evaluations competitiveness secondary school students social comparisons

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart