Predictors and forms of intervention in peer bullying: pre-service teachers vs. teachers

Research shows that teachers’ perceptions of peer bullying (PB) are an important predictor of their intervention. Therefore, the aims of the study were to find out i) how serious pre-service teachers and teachers find different types of PB, ii) how empathic to the victims and willing to intervene they are, iii) what predicts interventions in both groups and iv) what forms of intervention pre-service teachers and teachers would use regarding victims and perpetrators. Results suggest that teachers perceive all types of PB as more severe than pre-service teachers and are more willing to intervene earlier, but pre-service teachers show more empathy for the victims. The strongest predictor of intervention in both groups is beliefs about the severity of bullying, but their forms of intervention differ significantly. Implications of the study findings are also discussed.

REFERENCES:

• Bauman, S., & Del Rio, A. (2006). Pre-service teachers’ response to bullying scenarios: Comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 219-231.
• Berger, K. (2007). Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten? Developmental Review, 27, 90-126.
• Bradshaw, C., Sawyer, A., & O’Brennan, L. (2007). Bullying and peer victimization at school: perceptual differences between students and school stuff, School Psychology Review, 35, 361-383.
• Chen, L.M., Liu, K.S., & Cheng, Y.Y. (2012). Validation of the perceived school bullying severity scale. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 32(2), 169-182. doi:10.1080/01443410. 2011.633495.
• Craig, K., Bell, D., & Leschied, A. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge and attitudes regarding school-based bullying. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(2), 21-33.
• Doll, B., Song, S., & Siemens, E. (2004). Classroom ecologies that support or discourage bullying. In D.L.  Espelage and S.W.  Swearer (Eds.). Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 161-183). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Ellis, A.A., & Schute, R. (2007).Teacher responses to bullying in relation to moral orientation and seriousness of bullying. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 649-663. doi: 10.1348/000709906X163405.
• Flemming. L.C., & Jacobsen, K.H. (2009). Bullying among middle-school students in low and middle income countries. Health Promotion International, 25(1), 73-84. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap046.
• Holt, M.K., & Keyes, M.A. (2004).Teachers’ attitude towards bullying. In D.L. Espelage and S.M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 121-139). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Kochenderdfer-Ladd, B., & Pelletier, M.E. (2008). Teachers’ view and beliefs about bullying: Influences on classroom management strategies and students’ coping with peer victimization. Journal of School Psychology, 46(4), 431-453. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.07.005.
• Korthagen, F.A.J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 20(1), 77-97. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002.
• Nishina, A., & Juvonen, J. (2005). Daily reports of witnessing and experiencing peer harassment in middle school. Child Development, 76(2), 435-450.
• Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: bullies and whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
• Olweus, D. (1993). Victimization by peers: Antecedents and long-term outcomes. In K.H. Rubin and J.B. Asendorpf (Eds.), Social withdrawal, inhibition, and shyness in childhood (pp. 315-41). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
• Pečjak, S. (2014). Medvrstniško nasilje v šoli [Peer bullying in school]. Ljubljana: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete v Ljubljani.
• Sullivan, K. (2011). The anti-bullying handbook. London: Oxford University Press.
• Troop, W.P., & Ladd, G.W. (2002). Teachers’ beliefs regarding peer victimization and their intervention practices. Poster presented at the Conference on Human Development, Charlotte, NC.
• Vernberg, E.M., & Gamm, B.K. (2003). Resistance to violence prevention interventions in schools: Barriers and solution. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 5(2), 125-138.
• Yoon, J.S. (2004). Predicting teacher interventions in bullying situations. Education and Treatment of Children, 27(12), 37-45.
• Yoon, J.S. & Kerber, K. (2003). Bullying: Elementary teachers’ attitudes and intervention strategies. Research in Education, 69, 27-35.