Adapting an Anthropomorphized Robot for Enhancing EFL Learning Motivation and Performance at an Elementary School in Taiwan

This study introduced an anthropomorphized robot-assisted instructional tool that we developed for English as a foreign language (EFL) learning and assessed the effectiveness of robot-assisted English learning. An experimental design was adopted in this study and a total of 53 Taiwanese students in the third grade of elementary school participated in the experiment, including: one class consisting of 28 students, which was labeled as the experimental group, while another class of 25 students was labeled as the control group. There were two kinds of data collection that were used in this study: two tests (listening-and-acting as well as questioning-and-answering tests) and a questionnaire (learning material motivation scale). On the whole, the experimental group performed better than the control group on the listening-and-acting as well as on the questioning-and-answering tests. Additionally, the experimental group had higher learning material motivation than the control group, inclusive of attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction domains. The overall results suggest a new paradigm about our applications in teaching and learning English for Taiwanese EFL elementary school students.

REFERENCES:

• Benitti, F.B.V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978-988.
• Bers, M.U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E.R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145-157.
• Chan, T.W., & Baskin, A.B. (1988). Studying with the principle: The computer as a learning companion. The Proceedings of the International Conference of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS’88, Montreal, Canada, 194-200.
• Chang, C.W., Lee, J, H., Wang, C.Y., & Chen, G.D. (2010). Improving the authentic learning experience by integrating robots into the mixed-reality environment. Computer & Education, 55(4), 1572-1578.
• Chen, N.S., Quadir, B., & Teng, D.C. (2011). Integrating book, digital content and robot for enhancing elementary school students’ learning of English. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(3), 546-561.
• DeVries, R. (2000). Vygotsky, Piaget, and education: A reciprocal assimilation theories and educational practices. New Ideas in Psychology, 18, 187-213.
• Han, J. (2012). Emerging technologies: Robot assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 1-9.
• Han, J.H., Jo, M.H., Jones, V. & Jo, J.H. (2008). Comparative study on the educational use of home robots for children, Journal of Information Processing Systems, 4(4), 159-168.
• Hong, Z.W., Huang, Y.M., Hsu, M., & Shen, W.W. (2016). Authoring robot-assisted instructional materials for improving learning performance and motivation in EFL Classrooms. Educational Technology & Society 19 (1), 337-349.
• In, J., & Han, J (2015). The prosodic conditions in robot’s TTS for children as beginners in English Learning. Indian Journal of Science and Technology,8 (S5), 48-51.
• Keller, J.M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instruction design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.
• Lee, S., Noh, H., Lee, J., Lee, K., Lee, G.G., Sagong, S., & Kim, M. (2011). On the effectiveness of robot-assisted language learning. ReCALL, 23(01), 25-58.
• Molaee, Z., & Dortaj, F. (2015). Improving L2 learning: An ARCS instructional motivational approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 1214-1222.
• Mubin, O., Shahid, S., & Bartneck, C. (2013). Robot assisted language learning through games: A Comparison of two case studies. Australian Journal of Intelligent Information Processing Systems, 13(3), 9-13.
• Papert, S. (1993). Mindstroms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas (2ⁿd ed.). New York, NY: ACM.
• Slangen, L., Keulen, H.V., & Gravemeijer, K. (2011). What pupils can learn from working with robotic direct manipulation environments. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21, 449-469.
• Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process (M. Cole,V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner and E. Souberman, eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Wang, Y.H., Young, S.S.C., & Jang, J.S.R. (2013). Using tangible companions for enhancing learning English conversation. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 296-309.
• Young, S.S.C., Wang, Y.S., & Jang, J.S.R. (2010). Exploring perceptions of integrating tangible learning companions in learning English conversation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 78-83.