Generational Membership and the Intensity of Social Media Use Among Young Adults

Author: Magdalena Sitko-Dominik
Institution: University of Silesia in Katowice
Year of publication: 2019
Source: Show
Pages: 122-132
DOI Address:
PDF: tner/201904/tner5809.pdf

Young adults use social media to realize both social and educational goals. The aim of the study is to investigate whether there are any differences in the intensity of Facebook use between Generation Y and Generation Z. In addition, the size of friend networks has been analyzed.


  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1289-1295.
  • Bergman, S.M., Fearrington, M.E., Davenport, S.W., & Bergman, J.Z. (2011). Millennials, narcissism, and social networking: What narcissists do on social networking sites and why. Personality and Individual Differences, 50 (5), 706-711. Bolton, R.N., Parasuraman, A., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Kabadayi, S., Gruber, T., &
  • Solnet, D. (2013). Understanding Generation Y and their use of social media: a review and research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 24 (3), 245-267.
  • Boyd, D.M., & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13 (1), 210-230.
  • Brzezińska, A.I. (2015) Jak myślimy o rozwoju człowieka? [What do we think about human development?]. In: A.I. Brzezińska (ed.), Psychologiczne portrety człowieka. Praktyczna psychologia rozwojowa [Psychological portraits of a person. Practical psychology of human development]. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
  • Bullen, M., Morgan, T., & Qayyum, A. (2011). Digital learners in higher education: Generation is not the issue. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37 (1), 1-24.
  • Carlson, S. (2005). The net generation goes to college. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 23/02/2019, from
  • Chou, H.T.G., & Edge, N. (2012). They are happier and having better lives than I am: the impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others’ lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15 (2), 117-121.
  • DeBard, R. (2004). Millennials coming to college. New Directions for Student Services, 2004 (106), 33-45.
  • DiLullo, C., McGee, P., & Kriebel, R.M. (2011). Demystifying the Millennial student: A reassessment in measures of character and engagement in professional education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 4 (4), 214-226.
  • Evans, D.C., Robertson, N., Lively, T., Jacobson, L., Llamas-Cendon, M., Isaza, H., Rosenbalm, S., & Voigt, J. (2012). Facebook’s 8 fundamental hooks and 6 basic user types: A psychographic segmentation. The Four Peaks Review, 2, 36-54.
  • Frand, J. (2000). The Information Age Mindset: Changes in Students and Implications for Higher Education. Educause Review, 35 (5), 15-24.
  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81-112.
  • Hoy, W.K., Tarter, C.J., & Hoy, A.W. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43 (3), 425-446.
  • Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Books. JISC (2007) Student expectations study, July 2007. JISC. Retrieved 20/02/2019, from
  • Junco, R. (2011). Too much face and not enough books: the relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 187-198.
  • Juszczyk, S. (2015). Fields of impact of social media on youth-Methodological implications. Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 5 (2), 80-86.
  • Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarno, B., & Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond natives and immigrants: exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26 (5), 332-343.
  • Kirschner, P.A., & Karpinski, A.C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1237-1245.
  • Kuś, J., Szulżycki, M. (2014). Kwestionariusz Intensywności Użytkowania Facebooka (KIUF) - opis procedury konstrukcji oraz przedstawienie wyników badania pilotażowego [The Questionnaire of the Intensity of Facebook Use (KIUF) - construction and results of pilot survey]. In: M. Wysocka-Pleczyk, K. Tucholska (eds.) Człowiek zalogowany 2. Wirtualne społeczności [Human online 2. Virtual community]. Kraków: Biblioteka Jagiellońska.
  • Lancaster, L.C., & Stillman, D. (2002). When generations collide: Who they are, why they clash, how to solve the generational puzzle at work. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Lippincott, J.K. (2005). Net generation students and libraries. Educause Review, 40 (2), 56-66.
  • Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S.G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook?. Personality and Individual Differences, 52 (3), 243-249.
  • Oblinger, D., Oblinger, J.L., & Lippincott, J.K. (2005). Educating the net generation. Boulder: EDUCAUSE.
  • Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books.
  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9 (5), 1-6.
  • Prensky, M., & Berry, B.D. (2001). Do they really think differently. On the Horizon, 9 (6), 1-9.
  • Raport Gemius (2015). Media społecznościowe przez pryzmat wieku użytkowników [Social media in the users age aspect]. Gemius. Retrieved 17/09/2018, from
  • Ryan, T., Reece, J., Chester, A., & Xenos, S. (2016). Who gets hooked on Facebook? An exploratory typology of problematic Facebook users. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 10 (3), 1-25. doi: 10.5817/CP2016-3-4.
  • Sax, L.J. (2003). Our incoming students: What are they like? About Campus, 8 (3), 15-20.
  • Suler, J.R. (1999). To get what you need: healthy and pathological Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2 (5), 385-393.
  • Törőcsik, M., Szűcs, K., & Kehl, D. (2014). How generations think: research on Generation Z. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Communicatio, 1 (2014), 23-45.
  • Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and social interest. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71 (2), 103-113.
  • Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital. San Francisco: McGraw-Hill Companies.
  • Twenge, J.M. (2014). Generation me-revised and updated: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled- and more miserable than ever before. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Twenge, J.M., & Foster, J.D. (2010). Birth cohort increases in narcissistic personality traits among American college students, 1982-2009. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1 (1), 99-106.
  • Twenge, J.M., Campbell, W.K., & Freeman, E.C. (2012). Generational differences in young adults’ life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966-2009. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102 (5), 1045-1062.
  • Valkenburg, P.M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A.P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9 (5), 584-590.
  • Williams, K.C., & Page, R.A. (2011). Marketing to the generations. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 3 (1), 37-53.
  • Wrzus, C., Hänel, M., Wagner, J., & Neyer, F.J. (2013). Social network changes and life events across the life span: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139 (1), 53.
  • Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (2000). Generations at work: managing the clash of veterans, boomers, X’ers, and nexters in your workplace. New York: Performance Research Associate.
  • Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (5), 1816-1836.

generational membership young adulthood Facebook

Message to:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart