Hybrid Synchronous and Asynchronous Language Learning in Writing Class: The Learners’ Psychosocial Perspectives in Indonesia

  • Author: Tusino
  • Institution: Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo
  • Author: Semi Sukarni
  • Institution: Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo
  • Author: Titi Rokhayati
  • Institution: Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo
  • Year of publication: 2021
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 190-199
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.21.65.3.15
  • PDF: tner/202103/tner6515.pdf

Hybrid synchronous and asynchronous language learning remains under-explored in writing class. The purpose of this study is to describe learners’ perceptions toward hybrid synchronous and asynchronous language learning model in EFL writing. A qualitative case study was employed. The respondents were undergraduate learners in English major. The research instruments were close-response questionnaires and semi-structured interviews in the academic writing course. Findings showed that psychological and social factors were crucial in the learners’ online writing. It revealed that teachers needed to provide comprehensible input, challenging group-work activity, and constructive feedback during online writing. Hybrid synchronous and asynchronous language learning enhanced writing competence, but it encountered a problem with internet connectivity. The study discloses that hybrid synchronous and asynchronous language learning has the potential to teach EFL writing.

REFERENCES:

  • Abbasi Kasani, H., Shams Mourkani, G., Seraji, F., Rezaeizadeh, M., & Abedi, H. (2020). E-Learning Challenges in Iran: A Research Synthesis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(4), 96-116. https://doi.org/10.19173/ irrodl.v21i4.4677
  • Abe, M. (2020). Interactional practices for online collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100752.
  • Amiti, F. (2015). Synchronous and asynchronous learning, European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 5(2), 60-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v5i2.3313
  • Ariyanti, A. (2016). Psychological factors affecting EFL students’ speaking performance. ASIAN TEFL: Journal of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 77-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/asiantefl.v1i1.14
  • Carolan, F., & Kyppö, A. (2015). Teaching process writing in an online environment. In J. Jalkanen, E. Jokinen, & P. Taalas (Eds), Voices of pedagogical development - Expanding, enhancing and exploring higher education language learning (pp. 13-30). Dublin: Research-publishing.net. http://dx.doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2015.000285
  • Ene, E., & Upton, T.A. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.005
  • Habibian, M., Roslan, S., Idris, K., & Othman, J. (2015). The role of psychological factors in the process of reading. Journal of Education and Practice, 6, 114-123. https://www.iiste. org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/26681
  • Hu, R. (2016). The age factors in second language learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(11), 2164-2169. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0611.13
  • Huang, X. & Hsiao, E.L. (2012). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an online environment: Faculty experiences and perceptions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 15-30.
  • Keen, J. (2017). Teaching the writing process, Changing English. 24(4), 372-385, https://doi. org/10.1080/1358684X.2017.1359493
  • Kwak, S. (2017). Approaches Reflected in Academic Writing MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/ irrodl.v18i3.2845
  • Lin, H.S., Hong, Z.R., & Lawrenz, F. (2012). Promoting and scaffolding argumentation through reflective asynchronous discussions. Computers & Education, 59(2), 378-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.019
  • Long J., & Cumming J. (2013). Psychosocial Variables. In M.D. Gellman, & J.R. Turner (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-14419-1005-9_486
  • Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2010). Learning outcomes and students’ perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System, 38, 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.03.006
  • Montore, R.L., Chaves, M.J.Q., & Alvarado, J.S. (2014). Social factors involved in second language learning: A case study from the Pacific Campus, Universidad de Costa Rica. Revista de Lenguas Modernas, 435-451. https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rlm/article/view/15077/14350
  • O’Rourke, B., & Stickler, U. (2017). Synchronous communication technologies for language learning: Promise and challenges in research and pedagogy, Language Learning in Higher Education, 7(1), 1-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2017-0009
  • Omar, H., Embi, M.A., & Yunus, M.M. (2012). ESL learners’ interaction in an online discussion via Facebook. Asian Social Science, 8(11), 67. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n11p67
  • Perveen, A. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous e-language learning: A case study of virtual university of pakistan. Open Praxis, 8(1), 21-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ openpraxis.8.1.212
  • Racheva, V. (2018). Social aspects of synchronous virtual learning environments. AIP Conference Proceedings 2048, 020034, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5082050
  • Rinekso, A.B., & Muslim , A.B. (2020). Synchronous online discussion: teaching English in higher education amidst the covid-19 pandemic. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 5(2), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i2.646
  • Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. Routledge.
  • Shahabadi, M.M., & Uplane, M. (2015). Synchronous and asynchronous e-learning styles and academic performance of e-learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.453
  • Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157-190. https://doi.org/10.28945/3502
  • Wang, Q., Quek, C.L., & Hu, X. (2017). Designing and Improving a Blended Synchronous Learning Environment: An Educational Design Research. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl. v18i3.3034
  • Williams, L., & Lahman, M. (2011). Online discussion, student engagement, and critical thinking. Journal of Political Science Education, 7(2), 143-162.
  • Yamagata-Lynch, L.C. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778

learners’ perspectives writing class synchronous and asynchronous language learning Hybrid learning

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart