Method to Teach Korean History to Migrant Brides in Korea from China, Vietnam, and Japan

  • Author: Hyoung-Jin Moon
  • Institution: DongDuk Women’s University, Seoul
  • Author: Jong-Ho Nam
  • Institution: Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
  • Year of publication: 2020
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 103-114
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.20.62.4.09
  • PDF: tner/202004/tner6209.pdf

To find a more effective teaching method, the acceptance of migrant brides from China, Vietnam, and Japan of Korean history was investigated using the survey method. Four types of teaching methods were investigated. Before participating in the survey, migrant brides from Vietnam preferred the cramming teaching method (CTM), and those from China and Japan favored an audiovisual teaching method (ATM). However, after experiencing four types of teaching methods for a week—the CTM, ATM, comparative-history teaching method (CHTM), and discussion teaching method (DTM)—participants from Vietnam indicated the highest preference for ATM, whereas those from Japan and China preferred CHTM. Ultimately, this study demonstrated that a comparative-history teaching method is most effective for teaching migrant brides from countries with a history of recurrent cultural conflicts with Korea.

REFERENCES:

  • 2020 Annual Report on Korea Immigration Service, Ministry of Justice.
  • Choi, Kap-soon & Moon, Hyong-jin. (2006). Korean modern history in Chinese high school texts (1949-2003). Journal of History and Culture, 24t Edition, 392-399.
  • Ha, Jong-moon. (2005). Japan’s conservative shiftin political situation and problems of rightwing textbooks. Seoul: Koguryo Research Foundation, 259-291.
  • Han, Sang-bok & Gwon, Tae-hwan. (1994). Joseon race in Yanbian, China. Seoul. Seoul National University Press, 25-35.
  • Hwang, Yu-bok. (2002). Shedding light on the society and culture of Joseon Race in China. Liaoning: People’s Publisher, 179-197.
  • Kim, Ji-hoon & Jeong, Young-soon. (2004). Korea and Korean history in recent Chinese history textbooks for middle and high schools. Research on the Modern History of China. 23, 178-179.
  • Kim, Han-jung. (2005). Korea, China and Japan’s recognition of modern history and education. Seoul: Koguryo Research Foundation, 25-60.
  • Lee, Gwang-gyu. (1994). Korean-Chinese people. Seoul: Iljogak, 124-150.
  • Moon, Hyoung-jin, Nam, Jong-ho & Kim, Yongdeog. (2014). New measures for the improvement of history education for Chinese students in South Korea. The New Educational Review, 37(3), 54-55.
  • Moon, Hyoung-jin, Nam, Jong-ho, & Kim, Yongdeog. (2017). New measures to improve Korean culture education for Chinese Students in South Korea: Focusing on racial differences. The New Educational Review, 50(4), 146-158.
  • Moon, Hyoung-jin & Nam, Jong-ho. (2018). Study on the effect of Chinese Confucian ideas on Korean youth education & culture and teaching method - Based on the data of university students. The New Educational Review, 54(4), 51-61.
  • Nam, Jong-ho, Kim, Insik & Kim, Yongdeog. (2016). Social science education offered by Chinese departments in Korean universities. The New Educational Review, 44(2), 17-18.
  • Wang, Hyeon-jong. (2005). The modernization movement of three countries and their mutual recognition: A focus on middle school history textbooks of Korea, China, and Japan. Seoul: Koguryo Research Foundation, 65-110.
  • Yonhap News Agency. (2011). Local government of Hampyeong-gun actively looks for wives for bachelors in rural areas, 2011-10-19. https://www.yna.co.kr/view/ RPR20111019009100353?section=search
  • Yu, Young-tae. (2005). Perception of Korean history and Sino-centrism in Chinese university history textbooks. China’s Northeast Project and the Chinese Nationalism. Seoul: Koguryo Research Foundation.

history education cramming teaching method comparative-history teaching method discussion teaching method audiovisual teaching method

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart