Using Unstructured Cognitive Maps to Analyse the Reflective Thinking of Teachers: Results of Qualitative Research

Author: Kálmán Sántha
Institution: Kodolányi János University
Year of publication: 2020
Source: Show
Pages: 151-164
DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.20.60.2.12
PDF: tner/202002/tner6012.pdf

In recent years, discourse in education sciences has focussed on the study of the reflective thinking of teachers. Researchers, however, do not agree on how the reflective thinking of teachers can be measured. This qualitative study looks for an answer to the question whether a cognitive map is suitable for the discovery of teachers’ reflections. The study analyses the reflections of a secondary school teacher of mathematics using an unstructured cognitive map. The sample was selected on the basis of availability. The analysis of the map was done deductively, in a concept-driven way, on the basis of the number of contacts (edges) and concepts, central, peripheral and isolated concepts and their degrees, and the levels of the map. The teacher involved was recorded commenting on the process of map-making, which was then transferred to writing. The text corpus was then analysed inductively, in a data-driven way. The results show that the teacher interpreted his own activity - which depends on pedagogical knowledge, beliefs and pedagogical situations - in a complex manner. The filter function of beliefs can be observed when the teacher’s activities and thinking did not match because some internal and external factors. The data from the map contributed to analysis of reflections and the analysis of the map added new elements to existing techniques.

REFERENCES:

  • Baumgartner, P., & Welte, H. (2009). Lernen lehren, lehren lernen (Teaching learning, learning teaching). In: Meixner, J., & Müller, K. (Hrsg.), Konstruktivistische Schulpraxis: Beispiele für den Unterricht (Constructivist School Practice: Examples for Practice). (pp. 275-278). Weinheim und Basel: Beltz Verlag.
  • Budiastra, K.A.A., Erlina, N., & Wicaksono, I. (2019). Video-based Interaction through Teacher Working Group Forum to Increase Elementary School Teachers’ Professionalism. The New Educational Review, 57 (3), 187-199.
  • Dammerer, J., & Schwab, K. (2019). Entwicklungsmodelle von beginnenden Lehrpersonen. Eine vergleichende qualitative Untersuchung zum Phasenmodell nach Huberman und Stufenmodell nach Fuller & Brown (Development models of beginning teachers. A comparative qualitative study of the Huberman phase model and the Fuller & Brown model). R&E-SOURCE Online Journal for Research and Education, Retrieved 03/12/2019, from https://journal.ph-noe.ac.at.
  • Dervent, F. (2015). The effect of reflective thinking on the teaching practices of preservice physical education teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 25 (3), 260-257.
  • Dragos, V., & Mih, V. (2015). Scientific literacy in school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20 (9), 167-172.
  • Duşa, A., & Frunzaru, V. (2011). The Visual Analogue Scale. An Alternative to the Likert Type Response Scales. International Review of Social Research, 1 (1), 91-103.
  • Eden, C. (2003). Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 159 (3), 673-686.
  • Etscheidt, S., Curran, C.M., & Sawyer, C.M. (2012). Promoting Reflection in Teacher Preparation Programs: A Multilevel Model. Teacher Education and Special Education, 35 (1), 7-26.
  • Johnson, R.S., Mims-Cox, J.S., & Doyle-Nichols, A. (2006). Developing Portfolios in Education. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Kane, M., & Trochim, W.M. (2007). Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation. Applied Social Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. doi:10.4135/9781412983730.
  • Kember, D., Leung, D., Jones, A., & Loke, A.Y. (2002). Development of a Questionnaire to measure the Level of Reflective Thinking. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25 (4), 382-395.
  • Kuckartz, U. (2019). Qualitative Text Analysis: A Systematic Approach. In: Kaiser, G. & Presmeg, N. (Eds.): Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education. (pp. 181-197). ICME-13 Monographs.
  • Leonhard, T., & Rihm, T. (2011). Erhöhung der Reflexionskompetenz durch Begleitveranstaltungen zum Schulpraktikum? - Konzeption und Ergebnisse eines Pilotprojekts mit Lehramtsstudierenden. (Increase reflection skills through accompanying events for school internship? - Concept and results of a pilot project with student teachers). LehrerInnenbildung auf dem Prüfstand, 4 (2), 240-270.
  • Levin, A., & Meyer-Siever, K. (2018). Entwicklung der reflexionskompetenz im rahmen eines fächerübergreifenden e-portfolios (Improving competences in a cross-curricular e-portfolio). In: Hoffmeinster, T. (Hrsg.), Resonanz. Magazin für lehre und studium an der Universität Bremen (Resonanz. Educational and scientific journal of the University of Bremen). (pp. 24-31). Bremen: Universität Bremen.
  • Maclellan, E. (2008). Pedagogical literacy: What it means and what it allows. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24 (8), 1986-1992.
  • Malterud, K., Siersma, V.D., & Guassora, A.D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26 (13), 1753-1760.
  • Messmer, R. (2015). Stimulated Recall as a Focussed Approach to Action and Thought Processes of Teachers. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research, 16 (1). Retrieved 18/06/2019, from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs150130.
  • Mirzaei, F., Phang, F.A., & Kashefi, H. (2014). Measuring Teachers Reflective Thinking Skills. Procedia- Social ad Behavioral Sciences, 141, 640-647.
  • Morse, J.M. (2000). Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10 (1), 3-5.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Leech, N. (2007). A call for qualitative power analyses. Quality and Quantity, 41 (1), 105-121.
  • Ostorga, A.N. (2006). Developing Teachers Who Are Reflective Practitioners: A Complex Process. Issues in Teacher Education, 15 (2), 5-20.
  • Perkowska-Klejman, A., & Odrowaz-Coates, A. (2019). Measuring the Unmeasurable? Differences in Reflexive Thinking among Polish Students. The New Educational Review, 55 (1), 77-88.
  • Sántha, K. (2017). Network cards as a way of discovering the reflective thinking of teacher trainees: the relevancies of a qualitative analysis. PedActa, 7 (1), 13-18.
  • Sántha, K. (2018). The Development of Reflective Thinking in the First Six Years of Teaching. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 2 (2), 6-18.
  • Sántha, K. (2019). Teacher Trainees’ Beliefs Concerning Efficient Teaching and Learning - Pedagogical Spaces in Focus. The New Educational Review, 55 (1), 17-29.
  • Tynjälä, P. (1998). Writing as a tool for constructive learning: Students‘ learning experiences during an experiment. Higher Education, 36 (2), 209-230.
  • Vassinen, A. (2012). Configurational Explanation of Marketing Outcomes. A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approach. Helsinki: Aalto University. Retrieved 05/05/2014, from www.stratmark.fi/wp-content/uploads/Antti%20Vassinen_CEMO.pdf.
  • Wyss, C. (2013). Unterricht und Reflexion. Eine mehrperspektivische Untersuchung der Unterrichts- und Reflexionskompetenz von Lehrkräften (Instruction and reflection. A multi-perspective study of teaching and reflection skills among teachers). New York: Waxmann. Münster.

qualitative research beliefs unstructured cognitive map reflective thinking

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart