In Search of Tools for the Valorization of Children’s Artistic Creation in the Field of Imaging and the Results of the Creative Process - A Theoretical and Model Approach

  • Author: Beata Mazepa-Domagała
  • Institution: University of Silesia in Katowice
  • Year of publication: 2020
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 175-189
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.20.59.1.14
  • PDF: tner/202001/tner5914.pdf

The presented text is the result of reflection on the issue of children’s artwork and the procedure of valuing the work of children at a younger school age in the process of art education. The article outlines considerations on creativity and children’s art creation in the context/conceptual context and attempts to present a procedure for the evaluation of children’s art creations in terms of the ways of imaging in the conceptual context. The study is addressed to researchers and teachers of early childhood education, it is also a voice in the discussion on evaluating student achievements and - according to the author - a stimulus for reflective educational activities.

REFERENCES:

  • CraftA. (2002) Creativity and Early Years Education. A lifewide foundation. London and New York: Continuum.
  • Csikszentmihaly M. (2000) Creativity: An Overview. in: A. Kazdin (ed.), Encyclopedia of Psychology, vol. 2. (pp. 337-342). Washington: American Psychological Association.
  • Feldman D.H. (1986) Nature’s gambit: Child prodigies and development of human potential. New York: Basic Book.
  • Kaufman B.J.C. & Sternberg R.J. (2010) The Cambridge Handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mazepa-Domagała B. (2009) Dziecięce spotkania ze sztuką. Strategia projektowania spotkań ze sztuką oparta na rozumieniu , interpretacji i tworzeniu przekazów wizualnych [Children’s meetings with art. A strategy of designing meetings with art based on understanding, interpretation and creating visual messages]. Katowice: “Śląsk” Scientific Publishing House.
  • McNiff, R. (2008) Art-based research, in J.G. Knowles & A.L. Cole (Eds.) Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues (pp. 29-40), Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  • Runco, M.A. (2003) Education for Creative Potential, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, (3), 317-324.
  • Runco, M.A.& Charles R.E. (1997) Developmental Trends in Creative Potential and Creative Performa, (in M.A. Runco, (Ed.) The Creativity, The Creativity Research Handbook, Volume One (pp. 115-152), New Jersey: Hampton Press.
  • Sawyer R.K., Johan-Steiner V., Moran S., Sternberg R.J., Feldman D.H., Nakamura J., & Csikszentmihaly M.(2003) Creativity and development, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (2006) The Nature of Creativity, Creativity Research Journal 18, (1), 87-98
  • Strzałecki, A. (2003) Psychologia twórczości Między tradycją a ponowoczesnością [Psychology of creativity. Between tradition and post-modernity]. Warsaw: Publishing House of Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University.

creativity artistic creativity artistic creation evaluation valorization child at a younger school age

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart