Adult Learners’ Perceptions of the Use of Interactive Whiteboards in University Classrooms

Author: Horng-Ji Lai
Institution: National Chi Nan University
Year of publication: 2014
Source: Show
Pages: 55-65
DOI Address:
PDF: tner/201402/tner3604.pdf

The purpose of this study was to investigate adult learners’ perceptions of the use of Interactive Whiteboards (IWBs) in a university classroom in Taiwan. The participants were undergraduate students in a Master’s program. Research data were obtained through students’ interviews, site observations, and students’ reflective journals on the course website. Interviews were conducted with six adult learners who were also working professionals. The research data indicate that adult learners valued the benefits of using IWBs in instruction and workplace learning and pointed out that instructors’ readiness and competence determine the effectiveness of IWB integration in classrooms. Another important finding revealed in this study suggested that instructors need to develop creative IWB lesson plans that fully utilize the advantages of IWBs in order to ensure that IWBs are effectively and continually used in adult education/training settings.


  • Blue, E., & Tirotta, R. (2011). The benefits & drawbacks of integrating cloud computing and interactive whiteboards in teacher preparation. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 55(3), 31 - 39.
  • DeSantis, J. (2012). Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard investment: Three guiding principles for designing effective professional development. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 85(2), 51 - 55.
  • Gregory, S. (2010). Enhancing student learning with interactive whiteboards: Perspective of teachers and students. Australian Educational Computing, 25(2), 31 - 34.
  • Greiffenhagen, C. (2002). Out of the office into the school: Electronic whiteboards for education. Retrieved from
  • Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students’ perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102 - 117.
  • Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning, Media & Technology, 32(3), 283 - 301
  • Hennessy, S., & London, L. (2013). Learning from international experiences with interactive whiteboards: The role of professional development in integrating the technology. (EDU/WKP(2013)4). Organisation For Economic Co-operation and Development Retrieved from
  • Hur, J.W., & Suh, S. (2012). Making learning active with interactive whiteboards, podcasts, and digital storytelling in ell classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 29(4), 320.
  • Illeris, K. (2003). Workplace learning and learning theory. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(4), 167 - 178.
  • Kerawalla, L., Petrou, M., & Scanlon, E. (2013). Talk factory: Supporting “exploratory talk” around an interactive whiteboard in primary school science plenaries. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(1), 89 - 102.
  • Mathews-Aydinli, J., & Elaziz, F. (2010). Turkish students’ and teachers’ attitudes toward the use of interactive whiteboards in eflclassrooms. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 235 - 252.
  • Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Schmid, E. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1553 - 1568.
  • Slay, H., Siebörger, I., & Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just “lipstick”? Computers & Education, 51(3), 1321 - 1341.
  • Turel, Y.K., & Johnson, T.E. (2012). Teachers’ belief and use of interactive whiteboards for teaching and learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 381 - 394.
  • Xu, H.L., & Moloney, R. (2011). Perceptions of interactive whiteboard pedagogy in the teaching of Chinese language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(2), 307 - 325.
  • Yanez, L., & Coyle, Y. (2011). Children’s perceptions of learning with an interactive whiteboard. ELT Journal, 65(4), 446 - 457.

adult learning interactive whiteboards workplace learning adult education

Message to:



© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart