To Think Like a Scientist: an Experience from the Czech Primary School Inquiry-based Learning Programme

  • Author: Jan Cincera
  • Institution: Technical University of Liberec
  • Year of publication: 2014
  • Source: Show
  • Pages: 118-130
  • DOI Address: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.14.36.2.09
  • PDF: tner/201402/tner3609.pdf

The paper presents an evaluation of an inquiry-based learning programme for primary school pupils in the Czech Republic. The programme consisted of two parts: in the first part pupils acquired and practised inquiry skills, in the second they applied them to three independent inquiry-based learning lessons. Both pupils and teachers were highly satisfied with the programme. According to the pre/post non-equivalent experimental/control group designed evaluation research, the pupils who participated in the programme significantly improved their understanding of the research cycle representing the basic logic of scientific work. No such change appeared in the control groups. The programme influenced both boys and girls. Even though no significant gender differences for the groups of the 4th-5th grades and 6th-7th grades were found, the girls from the 8th-9th grade received a better score than the boys in both pre- and post-testing.

REFERENCES:

  • Ashby, J., Hubbert, V., Cotrel-Gibbons, L., Cox, K., Digan, J., Lewis, K. ….Wilson, L. (2006). The enquiry-based learning experience: an evaluation project. Nurse Education in Practice, 6(1), 22 - 30. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2005.05.008
  • Bilek, M., & Schmutzerova, L. (2010). Jak hodnotili cesti patnactileti zaci základnich skol a studenti víceletych gymnazii environmentalni problemy. Envigogika, 5(2). Retrieved from http://envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/54/html_54
  • Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Everett, M. (2005). Measuring environmental education program impacts and learning in the field: Using an action research cycle to develop a tool for use with young students. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 23 - 37.
  • Cronje, R., Rohlinger, S., Crall, A., & Newman, G. (2011). Does participation in citizen science improve scientific literacy? A study to compare assessment methods. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 10(3), 135 - 145. doi: 10.1080/1533015X.2011.603611
  • Cincera, J. (2011). Rozvoj vyzkumnych kompetenci zaku na zakladni skole - zkusenosti z evaluace programu o Jizerskych horach. Envigogika, 6(3). Retrieved from http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/63
  • Cincera, J., & Maskova, V. (2011). GLOBE in the Czech Republic: a program evaluation. Environmental Education Research, 17(4), 499 - 517. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2011.557497
  • Dvorackova, S., & Ryplova, R. (2012). Sonda environmentalni gramotnosti studentu prirodovedne a ekologicky zamerenych oboru na Pedagogicke fakulte JU. Envigogika, 7(3), Retrieved from http://www.envigogika.cuni.cz/index.php/Envigogika/article/view/77
  • Gautreau, B.T., & Binns, I.C. (2012). Investigating student attitudes and achievements in an environmental place-based inquiry in secondary classrooms. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7(2), 167 - 195.
  • Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching: exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. In R. Barnett (Ed.). Reshaping the university: New relationship between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 67 - 78). McGraw Hill / Open University Press.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235 - 266. doi: 1040-726X/04/0900-0235/0
  • Chiappetta, E.L., & Adams, A.D. (2004). Inquiry-based instruction, The Science Teacher, 71(2),46 - 50.
  • Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivists’, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75 - 86.
  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, Inc.
  • Kuech, R. (2004). Collaborative and interactional processes in an inquiry-based, informal learning environment. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 39(1), 30 - 41.
  • Magnussen, L., Ishida, D., & Itano, J. (2000). The impact of the use of inquiry-based learning as a teaching methodology on the development of critical thinking. Journal of Nursing Education, 39(8), 360 - 365.
  • Marcinkowski, T. (1997). Assessment in environmental education. In R.J. Wilke (Ed.). Environmental education. Teacher resource handbook. A practical guide for K-12 environmental education (pp. 143 - 199). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049 - 1079.
  • Paleckova, J. (2007). Hlavni zjisteni vyzkumu PISA 2006. Poradi si zaci s prirodnimi vedami? Praha: Ustav pro informace ve vzdelavani.
  • Papacek, M. (2010a). Badatelsky orientovane prirodovedne vyucovani - cesta pro biologicke vzdelavani generaci Y, Z a alfa? Scientia in educatione, 1(1), 33 - 49.
  • Papacek, M. (2010b). Limity a sance zavadeni badatelsky orientovaneho vyucovani prirodopisu a biologie v Ceske republice. In M. Papacek (Ed.). Didaktika biologie v Ceske republice 2010 a badatelsky orientovane ucení. DiBi 2010. Sbornik prispevku seminare, 25. - 26.3.2010 (pp. 145 - 162). Ceske Budejovice: Jihoceska univerzita.
  • Pastorova, M. (Ed.) (2011). Doporucene ocekavane vystupy. Metodicka podpora pro vyuku prurezovych temat na zakladnich skolach. Praha: Vyzkumny ustav pedagogicky. Retrieved from http://www.vuppraha.cz/nova-publikace-divizevup-%E2%80%93-doporucene-ocekavane-vystupy-pro-zakladni-skoly.
  • Pea, C.H. (2012). Inquiry-based instruction: Does school environmental context matter? Science Educator, 21(1). Retrieved from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-2771193041.html
  • Straits, W.J., & Wilke, R.R. (2002). Practical considerations for assessing inquirybased instruction. Journal of College Science Technology, 31(7), 432 - 435.
  • Stuchlikova, I. (2010). O badatelsky orientovanem vyucovani. In M. Papacek (Ed.). Didaktika biologie v Ceske republice 2010 a badatelsky orientovane uceni. DiBi 2010. Sbornik prispevku seminare, 25. - 26.3.2010 (pp. 129 - 135). Ceske Budejovice: Jihoceska univerzita.
  • Summerlee, A., & Murray, J. (2010). The impact of enquiry-based learning on academic performance and student engagement. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 40(2), 78 - 94.
  • Vanhear, J., & Pace, P.J. (2008). Integrating knowledge, feelings and action: using VEE heuristics and concept mapping in education for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10(1), 42 - 54. doi: 10.2478/v10099-009-0024-3.
  • Wolf, M., & Laferriere, A. (2009). Crawl into inquiry-based learning. Hermit crab experiments. Science activities, 46(3), 32 - 37.

inquiry-based learning programme evaluation Czech Republic research cycle

Message to:

 

 

© 2017 Adam Marszałek Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Projekt i wykonanie Pollyart